This is a prospective, randomized controlled trial in a single center to explore the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous disc decompression with coblation nucleoplasty (PDCN) for the treatment of cervicogenic dizziness.
Vertigo ranks among the most common complaints in medicine and have a considerable personal impact, affecting 15-35% of the general population at some point in their lives. The combination of neck disorders with vertigo or dizziness was formally coined "cervical vertigo" by Ryan and Cope in 1955. The precise incidence of cervical vertigo is controversial but it is estimated that 20-58% of patients who sustain closed-head injuries or whiplash experience late onset symptoms of dizziness, vertigo and disequilibrium. The treatment option of cervical vertigo is versatile and challenging. Surgical intervention is recommended when the patient is a good candidate. Plasma-mediated ablation using the Coblation Spine-Wand device has been used for several years to perform spine disc decompression. However, there is no short and long-term report of percutaneous disc decompression with coblation nucleoplasty (PDCN) for treatment of cervical vertigo, and complications observed with this procedure have not been reported yet. In the retrospective observational study (unpublished data), the investigators found that PDCN was effective for reducing cervicogenic dizziness, a disabling and persistent problem, in the long term. A mean effective rate of 94.6% (70 of the 74 patients) one week after surgery and 90.6% (67 of the 74 patients) at the last follow-up (1 year to 8 years and 3 months). Good to excellent results were attained in 85.1% (63 of the 74 patients) of these patients one week after PDCN and achieved in 75.7% (56 of the 74 patients) at the last follow-up (p\<0.0001). Recently, a randomized trial had proven that manual therapy had long-term beneficial effects in the treatment of chronic cervicogenic dizziness. This study aims to conduct a randomized controlled trial to investigate both of its short term and long term effectiveness and safety in prospective fashion comparing with manual therapy. Participants will be randomized and allocated to either PDCN group or manual therapy group with 1:1 ratio. All the patients had recurring symptom of dizziness over three months and conservative treatment applied for at least three weeks and failed.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
70
PDCN was performed using the COBLATION Perc-DC SpineWand surgical device (ArthroCare System 2000, ArthroCare corporation, Heredia, Costa Rica, USA) under local anesthesia. The introducer cannula was then pierced into the target intervertebral disc through an anterior lateral approach. The tip of the cannula stylet was aimed for the center of the nucleus in both the coronal and sagittal planes. The stylet was withdrawn from the introducer cannula and replaced with the Perc-DC SpineWand. The wand was advanced until its tip extended approximately 5 mm beyond the tip of the cannula. A short initial coagulation was performed upon wand insertion to ensure correct placement, if stimulation or movement was detected, the wand was repositioned. As the wand was drawn back out through the disc, ablation energy was set to level three and three ablation cycles of 5-12soconds each were performed, rotating the wand tip 180 degree each time to form three consecutive pockets within the disc.
(1) sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAGs): Use the methods described in Mulligan BR. Manual therapy "NAGS", "SNAGS", "MWMS" etc. 5th ed. Wellington, New Zealand: Plane View Services; 2004. Three sessions per week and for a total of four to six weeks according to the patients' condition, they were asked to continue the self-SNAG once daily until the last follow-up, and recorded in a diary. (2) passive joint mobilisations (PJMs): Use the methods described in Maitland G. Vertebral manipulation. 6th ed. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; 2001. For three repetitions weekly and for a total of four to six weeks according to the patients' condition, then once a day were commenced as a home exercise to be continued until the last follow-up, and recorded in a diary.
the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
RECRUITINGChange of baseline in Dizziness Intensity
Self-reported dizziness on a 100mm visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time frame: Change between Baseline and 1 week- 1 month- 3 months- 6 months- 1 year- 2 years- 3 years- 5 years respectively after treatment
Dizziness frequency (rated between o (none) and 5 (>once/day))
Self-reported dizziness on a scale of 0-10
Time frame: Change between Baseline and 1 week- 1 month- 3 months- 6 months- 1 year- 2 years- 3 years- 5 years respectively after treatment
Change in Dizziness Handicap Index (DHI) Score
Self-reported measure evaluating perceived handicap secondary to dizziness, the DHI has 25 items with 3 response levels, sub-grouped into three domains: functional, emotional, and physical
Time frame: Change between Baseline and 1 week- 1 month- 3 months- 6 months- 1 year- 2 years- 3 years- 5 years respectively after treatment
Change in Numeric Pain Rating Scale Score-Neck pain
Self-report score for headache on a scale of 0-10
Time frame: Change between Baseline and 1 week- 1 month- 3 months- 6 months- 1 year- 2 years- 3 years- 5 years respectively after treatment
Change in SF-36 Health Scale Score
Self-report score for assessing both of physical functioning and bodily pain on a scale of 12 items
Time frame: Change between Baseline and 1 week- 1 month- 3 months- 6 months- 1 year- 2 years- 3 years- 5 years respectively after treatment
Clinical efficacy assessed by 10 point rating scale
0=no benefit, 1=minimal benefit, 2=some benefit, 3=a lot of benefit, 4=great benefit, 5=maximal benefit
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 1 week- 1 month- 3 months- 6 months- 1 year- 2 years- 3 years- 5 years respectively after treatment
Clinical efficacy evaluated by modified MacNab evaluation criteria
excellent (A)=dizziness and associated symptoms disappeared completely, resumed normal work and life; good (B)= improved significantly, could do former work; acceptable (C)=somewhat improved, could only undertake light work; poor (D)=not improved significantly, further treatment was required. Fitness rate=A+B; Effective rate=A+B+C
Time frame: 1 week- 1 month- 3 months- 6 months- 1 year- 2 years- 3 years- 5 years respectively after treatment
Surgical complications
discitis, neurological complications, vascular injuries, dural Injury, CSF Leakage, recrudescence, and other severe adverse effects
Time frame: during operation, up to 1 week and 1 month and 3 months and 6 months respectively after intervention
Image findings evaluated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
changes of intervertebral disc signal and herniation
Time frame: Change between Baseline and 1 week- 1 month- 6 months- 1 year- 2 years- 3 years- 5 years respectively after treatment
Changes of intervertebral disc height assessed by X ray
height of anterior, middle and posterior portion of the targeted disc (disc with intervention)
Time frame: Change between Baseline and 1 week- 1 month- 6 months- 1 year- 2 years- 3 years- 5 years respectively after treatment
Changes of cobb angle assessed by X ray
draw a line either parallel to the inferior endplate of C-2 or extending from the anterior tubercle of C-1 to the posterior margin of the spinous process, and another line parallel to the inferior endplate of C-7. Perpendicular lines are then drawn from each of the 2 lines noted above, and the angle subtended between the crossing of the perpendicular lines is the cervical curvature angle
Time frame: Change between Baseline and 1 week- 1 month- 6 months- 1 year- 2 years- 3 years- 5 years respectively after treatment