Transvaginal Versus Transobturator Paravaginal Repair

N/ACompletedNCT03489902

Ain Shams Maternity Hospital40 enrolled

Overview

Clinical trial comparing the new technique for paravaginal repair versus the traditional technique

trial comparing the transobturator paravaginal repair versus the traditional technique

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

NON_RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Cystocele

Interventions

Transobturator Paravaginal RepairPROCEDURE

Transobturator application of sutures to the white line in cases needing paravaginal repair

traditional transvaginal Paravaginal RepairPROCEDURE

traditional transvaginal application of sutures to the white line

Eligibility

Sex: FEMALEMin age: 20 YearsMax age: 50 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: paravaginal defect cystocele midline and paravaginal defect cystocele Exclusion Criteria: * uterine descent previous cystocele surgery

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Operative data

Operative time

Time frame: 1 day

Secondary Outcomes

Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system

Evaluation of the postoperative degree of anterior vaginal wall descent

Time frame: 3 month

Operative Details

blood loss

Time frame: 1 day

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.