Abdominal Versus Vaginal Hysteropexy

Ain Shams Maternity Hospital53 enrolled

Overview

This study will compare the vaginal versus the abdominal approach for the management of uterine prolapse

this study compares The unilateral sacrospinous hysteropexy with prolene sutures versus the abdominal sacral hysteropexy using Mersilene suture for the management of uterine prolapse

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Uterine Prolapse

Interventions

Sacral HysteropexyPROCEDURE

Abdominal approach for uterine suspension

sacrospinous HysteropexyPROCEDURE

Transvaginal approach for uterine suspension

Eligibility

Sex: FEMALEMin age: 20 YearsMax age: 40 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Uterine Prolapse Exclusion Criteria: * Previous prolapse surgery Hereditary Connective tissue disorders

Locations (1)

Urogynecology Unit

Cairo, Egypt

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system

compare Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system between groups

Time frame: 3 month

Secondary Outcomes

Perioperative data

operative time

Time frame: 1 day

operative details

blood loss

Time frame: 1 day

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.