Preterm Induction of Labor Timing of Amniotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview

Artificial rupture of membranes (amniotomy) is a commonly used technique to safely induce and augment labor. It has been shown to reduce the duration of spontaneous and induced labor in term patients (≥37 weeks' gestation). The utility of amniotomy in preterm patients (\<37 weeks' gestation) undergoing medically-indicated induction of labor is unknown. However, it remains a commonly used strategy. We will conduct a trial comparing early amniotomy versus late amniotomy during medically-indicated induction of labor between 23.0 and 35.6 weeks gestation. Women will be randomized to early or late amniotomy after the obstetrician has decided to induce labor for a medical indication. We hypothesize that more women in the early amniotomy group will require cesarean delivery, and the duration of labor will increase in the early amniotomy group.

The rate of preterm birth in the United States is nearly 10%. Up to one-third of these births are the result of a medically-indicated delivery. While induction of labor in women at term gestation has been extensively studied, the same is not true for preterm gestations. Consequently, the same methods of labor induction are used in term and preterm gestations, although preterm gestations may have different responses to induction agents compared to term gestations. At our institution, a standard induction of labor - for term or preterm women - is performed using a cervical Foley catheter or misoprostol for cervical ripening with the addition of intravenous oxytocin for labor augmentation. As membranes do not typically spontaneously rupture during the induction process, amniotomy is commonly utilized by providers to help augment labor. Amniotomy releases prostaglandin-rich amniotic fluid. These prostaglandins are important mediators of uterine contractility and ultimately active labor. It has been shown to reduce the duration of spontaneous and induced labor in term patients. The timing of amniotomy is left up to the discretion of the treating providers, as there are no randomized controlled trials to support early versus late amniotomy at preterm gestations. However, a retrospective cohort of nulliparous and multiparous women at our institution undergoing induction at 23-34 weeks, and evaluating early amniotomy at \<4cm cervical dilation versus late amniotomy at ≥4cm dilation, showed an increased risk of cesarean delivery and increased time from start of induction to delivery for early amniotomy, although only the cesarean delivery outcome was significant after adjusting for confounders. We will conduct an intention-to-treat randomized controlled trial comparing early amniotomy versus late amniotomy during medically-indicated induction of labor between 23.0 and 35.6 weeks gestation. Women will be randomized to early or late amniotomy after the attending obstetrician has decided to induce labor for a medical indication. Early amniotomy will be performed prior to 4cm cervical dilation being reached. Late amniotomy will be performed at greater than or equal to 4cm cervical dilation. The purpose of this study is to determine whether timing of amniotomy during medically-indicated preterm induction of labor affects labor outcomes. We will specifically be looking at risk of cesarean delivery, duration of labor, maternal morbidity, and neonatal morbidity. We hypothesize that more women in the early amniotomy group will require cesarean delivery and that the duration of labor will increase in the early amniotomy group.