Monitoring SOF/VEL in Treatment Naïve, HCV Participants With Active Infection

Overview

To achieve global hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination by 2030, 80% of the \~71 million people with chronic HCV infection will need to be treated, necessitating simplification of treatment delivery and associated laboratory monitoring without compromising efficacy or safety. The COVID-19 pandemic has further highlighted the need for innovative models of health care delivery that minimize face-to-face patient-provider contact. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a minimal monitoring (MINMON) strategy to deliver interferon- and RBV-free, pan-genotypic DAA therapy to treat active HCV in HCV treatment naïve participants.

This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a minimal monitoring (MINMON) strategy of delivering interferon- and ribavirin (RBV)-free, pan-genotypic direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy to treat active hepatitis C virus (HCV) in HCV treatment naïve participants, with or without HIV-1 co-infection, and with no evidence of decompensated cirrhosis. The MINMON intervention included four components: 1) No pre-treatment HCV genotyping; 2) Entire 12-week treatment course (84 tablets) dispensed to participants at study entry; 3) No scheduled on-treatment laboratory monitoring or clinic visits prior to SVR evaluation scheduled 24 weeks following entry; 4) Remote contact with participants at week 4 for adherence counseling and locator update, and week 22 for scheduling of SVR visit and locator update. At study entry, all participants received a single-tablet, fixed-dose combination (FDC) of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) for 12 weeks. The trial was designed to accrue 400 adult participants who may be co-infected with HIV-1 (limited to no more than 200 participants), and whose liver disease state is either no cirrhosis (defined by Fibrosis-4 score) or compensated cirrhosis (defined by Fibrosis-4 and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) scores, and limited to no more than 80 participants). Accrual from research sites in the United States was limited to no more than 132 participants. The study proceeded in two steps: Step 1: MINMON intervention and Step 2: post-MINMON follow up. During Step 1 (MINMON intervention), participants were contacted remotely at week 4 to inquire about study medication adherence and confirm locator information, and again at week 22 to schedule the sustained virologic response (SVR) evaluation and confirm locator information. Unplanned in-person clinic visits before week 22 were permissible to address common treatment toxicities that could not be managed remotely. The primary efficacy outcome measure, sustained virologic response (SVR), was evaluated starting at the week 24 study visit. Early discontinuation of treatment did not alter the timing of the SVR evaluation. If the week 24 visit was missed, SVR could be evaluated at any time up to 76 weeks following study entry. Following SVR evaluation, participants entered Step 2 for two additional post-SVR evaluation study visits at weeks 48 and 72. Participants were contacted remotely at weeks 42 and 68 to schedule such visits. The schedule of additional post-MINMON evaluation visits were dependent on the week of Step 2 entry. In version 1 of the study, total study duration was up to 76 weeks. Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, the window of the week 72 visit was extended for participants who completed SVR evaluations and registered to Step 2 to October 31, 2020 for US sites and to February 28, 2021 for non-US sites. This extension did not alter the window for SVR evaluation. All scheduled in-clinic study visits included a physical exam, blood collection, and collection of plasma samples. For participants able to become pregnant, pregnancy testing was conducted at screening, entry, and at any in-clinic visit during Step 1 if pregnancy was suspected. Liver Elastography was an optional evaluation.