In this study, the investigators test 2 dose levels of thiotepa (5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg) added to the backbone of targeted reduced dose IV busulfan, fludarabine and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) to determine the minimum effective dose required for reliable engraftment for subjects undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for non-malignant disease.
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only curative choice for a number of inherited bone marrow failure syndromes, hemoglobinopathies, metabolic disorders and primary immune deficiencies. While survival of these patients is typically better than survival of patients with malignancies, toxicities of conditioning regimens and failure of engraftment remain challenges. Most children with non-malignant disorders present with normocellular or even hypercellular bone marrow, posing a barrier to engraftment and requiring intensive conditioning. Commonly used backbone of busulfan and fludarabine, although well tolerated, results in variable engraftment, in particular with mismatched unrelated donors and cord blood recipients. In this study, the investigators test 2 dose levels of thiotepa (5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg) added to the backbone of targeted reduced dose IV busulfan, fludarabine and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) in order to determine the minimum effective dose required for reliable engraftment. Subjects are stratified in groups A and B based the risk of graft failure.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
6
Conditioning regimen for hematopoietic stem-cell transplant. Single daily IV dose of Thiotepa at 5 mg/kg.
Twice daily IV dose of Thiotepa at 5 mg/kg, twelve hours apart, 10mg/kg total.
UF Health Shands Children's Hospital
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Assessment of Minimum Effective Dose (MED) of Thiotepa
Assess the MED of thiotepa in combination with reduced-dose busulfan, fludarabine and rATG required to achieve engraftment in \>90% subjects undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for non-malignant disorders.
Time frame: Day 42
Percentage of Subjects With Graft Rejection/Failure.
Percentage of all subjects who initiated conditioning regimen and have sustained engraftment failure.
Time frame: Day 42; Day 365
Percentage of Subjects Without Disease Recurrence Who Are Alive at 24 Months Post Transplant
Percentage of subjects who initiated conditioning regimen and are without evidence of underlying disease (DFS).
Time frame: Month 24
Percentage of Subjects Alive at 24 Months Post Transplant (OS)
Percentage of subjects who initiated conditioning regimen and are alive at 24 months post transplant (OS).
Time frame: Month 24
Evaluation of Transplant-related Mortality
Percentage of subjects who initiated conditioning regimen and who died due to a cause unrelated to the underlying disease.
Time frame: Month 12
Number of Participants With Grade 2-4 Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVDH)
Graft-versus host disease symptoms measured using Modified Glucksberg Staging Criteria. (Scale 0-4; with 4 being most severe)
Time frame: Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease (cGVHD)
Measures the frequency of chronic graft-vs-host disease in Group A participants
Time frame: Month 24
Percentage of Participants With Transplant-related Complications
Complications gathered via CIBMTR (Center for International Blood \& Marrow Transplant Research) post-transplant form was tabulated and described by treatment received.
Time frame: 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.