The primary objective of the study is to compare the progression-free survival (PFS) of REGN2810 (cemiplimab) plus ipilimumab combination therapy (hereinafter referred to as REGN2810/ipi) and REGN2810 plus 2 cycles only of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy plus ipilimumab combination therapy (hereinafter referred to as "REGN2810/chemo/ipi") with standard-of-care pembrolizumab monotherapy in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced squamous or non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors express programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in ≥50% of tumor cells. The key secondary objectives of the study are to compare the overall survival (OS) of REGN2810/ipi and REGN2810/chemo/ipi with pembrolizumab monotherapy in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced squamous or non-squamous NSCLC whose tumors express PD-L1 in ≥50% of tumor cells and to compare the overall response rate (ORR) of REGN2810/ipi and REGN2810/chemo/ipi with pembrolizumab monotherapy in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced squamous or non-squamous NSCLC whose tumors express PD-L1 in ≥50% of tumor cells.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
5
REGN2810 plus ipilimumab
REGN2810 plus chemotherapy plus Ipilimumab
Reference drug administered IV infusion
Regeneron Research Site
St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Cremona, Italy
Regeneron Research Site
Vilnius, Lithuania
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by a Blinded Independent Review Committee (IRC) Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) Assessments
Per protocol, the final analysis of PFS was to be performed after observing 142 PFS events in the pembrolizumab treatment arm. PFS was not assessed due to insufficient data collected.
Time frame: Up to 32 months
Overall Survival (OS)
Per protocol, if the final analysis of PFS was statistically significant for both cemiplimab combination therapy versus pembrolizumab treatment, the analysis of OS for cemiplimab combinations-versus-pembrolizumab comparison was to be performed at the time of PFS analysis, 12 months, and 18 months after analysis of PFS using the same method as used in the analysis of PFS.
Time frame: Up to 32 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Per protocol, the ORR for each cemiplimab combination-versus-pembrolizumab comparison was to be analyzed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by histological status (non-squamous versus squamous).
Time frame: Up to 32 months
Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: Up to 32 months
Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Time frame: Up to 32 months
Number of Participants With Any Serious TEAEs
Time frame: Up to 32 months
Number of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Death
Time frame: Up to 32 months
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities
Time frame: Up to 32 months
Overall Survival (OS) at 12 Months
Per protocol, if the final analysis of PFS was statistically significant for both cemiplimab combination therapy versus pembrolizumab treatment, the analysis of OS for cemiplimab combinations-versus-pembrolizumab comparison was to be performed at the time of PFS analysis, 12 months, and 18 months after analysis of PFS using the same method as used in the analysis of PFS.
Time frame: At 12 months
Overall Survival (OS) at 18 Months
Per protocol, if the final analysis of PFS was statistically significant for both cemiplimab combination therapy versus pembrolizumab treatment, the analysis of OS for cemiplimab combinations-versus-pembrolizumab comparison was to be performed at the time of PFS analysis, 12 months, and 18 months after analysis of PFS using the same method as used in the analysis of PFS.
Time frame: At 18 months
Quality of Life (Core 30 Questionnaire)
Quality of Life (QoL) as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) four-point scale, with 1 as "not at all" and 4 as "very much." Per protocol, the change in EORTC QLQ-C30 scores from the first assessment to the end of the study were to be summarized descriptively at each post-baseline time point and compared using a mixed effects model, if appropriate.
Time frame: Up to 32 months
Quality of Life (Lung Cancer 13 Questionnaire)
QoL as measured by the Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer 13 (EORTC QLQ-LC13) to assess lung cancer-associated symptoms and treatment-related side effects among lung cancer patients. The scale for EORTC-QLQ-LC13 is 1-4 for most outcome measures of systems, with 1 rated as "not at all" and 4 rated as "very much." Per protocol, the change in EORTC QLQ-LC13 scores from the first assessment to the end of the study were to be summarized descriptively at each post-baseline time point and compared using a mixed effects model, if appropriate.
Time frame: Up to 32 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.