This study is a multicentric, comparative, randomized, investigator-blinded, in parallel groups study to demonstrate the non-inferiority of DM05 in comparison with Optive™, in terms of cornea and conjunctiva staining (Oxford score) on patients with moderate to severe ocular dryness, after 35 days of treatment.
Evaluation of the non-inferiority of DM05 in comparison with OptiveTM, in terms of cornea and conjunctiva staining (Oxford score), on worse eye, between D0 and D35. * Comparison of D35 versus D0 and D84 versus D0 for each product and comparison between products for the following parameters: * Evolution of cornea and conjunctiva staining (Oxford score) on worse eye. * Evolution of OSDI score (Ocular Surface Disease Index). * Evolution of Van Bijsterveld score (Lissamine green staining) in worse eye. * Evolution of Schirmer test result in worse eye. * Evolution of Tear film Break-Up Time (TBUT) in worse eye. * Evolution of ocular dryness severity by evaluation of each main symptom by the patient and total score of all symptoms * Evaluation of treatment performance by the investigator and the patient. * Evaluation of the average frequency of use during 84 days for DM05 and OptiveTM. Selection visit: D-14 to D-7 Wash-out period: 1 to 2 weeks with preservative-free 0.9% NaCl at 3 drops per day (Hydrabak®): D0 : inclusion visit Follow-up visits: D35, D84
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
80
Ophthalmic use. One to two drops instilled in each eye from 4 to 6 times per day during 84 days of treatment.
Ophthalmic use. One to two drops instilled in each eye from 4 to 6 times per day during 84 days of treatment.
Demonstrate the non-inferiority of DM05 in comparison with OptiveTM, in terms of cornea and conjunctiva staining (Oxford score) on patients with moderate to severe ocular dryness, after 35 days of treatment.
Assess the ocular surface fluorescein staining score- mean change from Baseline in the study at D35 in ocular surface fluorescein stainig score according to a scale from zero to 15
Time frame: 35 days
To assess the total ocular surface fluorescein staining score at D84
Mean change from Baseline (D0) in the study eye and D84 in the total ocular surface fluoresceine staining score
Time frame: 0 and 84 days
Evolution of DEQ-5 score
Evolution from Baseline of DEQ-5 questionnaire scores at day 35
Time frame: 35 days
Evolution of DEQ-5 score
Evolution from Baseline of DEQ-5 questionnaire scores at day 84
Time frame: 84 days
Evolution of Van Bijterveld score ( lissamine green staining)
Mean change from Baseline ( D0) and D 35 in the total Van Bijterveld score
Time frame: 35 Days
Evolution of Van Bijterveld score ( lissamine green staining)
Mean change from Baseline ( D0) and D 84 in the total Van Bijterveld score
Time frame: 84 days
Volume tear fluid secretion as assessed by schirmer test
Mean change from Baseline ( D0) in Volume tear fluid secretion as assessed by schirmer test, at day 35
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 35 days
Volume tear fluid secretion as assessed by schirmer test
Mean change from Baseline ( D0) in Volume tear fluid secretion as assessed by schirmer test, at day 84
Time frame: 84 days
Evolution of Tear film Break-Up Time
Mean change from Baseline (D0) in the study eye in TFBUT at Day 35
Time frame: 35 days
Evolution of Tear film Break-Up Time
Mean change from Baseline (D0) in the study eye in TFBUT at Day 84
Time frame: 84 days
Global sum score of dry eye symptoms at visit 3 - mean change from Baseline at visit 3 ( D35)
Mean change from Baseline in the global sum score of dry eye symptoms at D35 : discomfort,burning, stinging,eye dryness sensation, itching,foreign body sensation,photophobia, blurred vision.Each graded from 0 to 10
Time frame: 35 days
Global sum score of dry eye symptoms at visit 4 - mean change from Baseline at visit 3 ( D84)
Mean change from Baseline in the global sum score of dry eye symptoms at D84 : discomfort,burning, stinging,eye dryness sensation, itching,foreign body sensation,photophobia, blurred vision.Each graded from 0 to 10
Time frame: 84 days
Global treatment performance score assessed by the investigator at visit 3
Total Treatment performance score graded from 0 to 4
Time frame: 35 days
Global treatment performance score assessed by the investigator at visit 4
Total Treatment performance score graded from 0 to 4
Time frame: 84 days
Global treatment performance score assessed by the patient at visit 3
Total Treatment performance score graded from 0 to 4
Time frame: 35 days
Global treatment performance score assessed by the patient at visit 4
Total Treatment performance score graded from 0 to 4
Time frame: 84 days