Mouth Guard Use in the Second Stage of Labor

Overview

Shortening the second stage of labor, the time spent pushing the baby out, is important for positive mother and infant's outcomes. Lack of progress of labor for any reason is the most common reason for cesarean section in women having their first baby and the second most common reason for cesarean section in women who have already had a baby. In 2014, a large study done across the United States showed increases in complications in both mother and infant when pushing was prolonged, including uterine infection, postpartum hemorrhage, more extensive vaginal tearing, shoulder dystocia, 5 minute Apgar score less than 4, infant admission to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and neonatal infections. Therefore, the challenge is to consider alternative practices in order to maximize a mother's chance of a vaginal delivery and minimize these associated risks to both mother and baby. Mouth guards are used primarily in contact sports, and have been demonstrated to reduce or prevent injury to the teeth. Additionally, it has been proposed that wearing a mouth guard increases the strength of different muscle groups. A recent randomized controlled pilot study including women with their first pregnancy using a dental support device (DSD) during the second stage of labor evaluated the length of the second stage and outcomes. They found a significant decrease of 38% in the length of pushing time in the group that used a DSD. Additionally, there was a decreased rate of cesarean section in this group, however a p-value was not reported. This study only included 64 patients. A second, larger trial did not find a significant difference in pushing time, however the rate of interventions such as a vacuum or forceps-assisted vaginal delivery and cesarean section were much higher in the control group due to prolonged pushing. The results of the second study are contradictory in nature, yet the researchers do not provide hypotheses into why this may be. It is clear from the previously mentioned studies that further research is needed. Our hypothesis is that using such a device would help women to push more effectively during the second stage of labor thus shortening the time needed to push the baby out and increasing the rate of vaginal delivery. The purpose of this study is to determine whether wearing a mouth guard in the second stage of labor affects the length of the second stage of labor and improves mother \& infant outcomes.

Optimizing the second stage of labor is important for positive maternal and neonatal outcomes. Dystocia of labor refers to a lack of progress of labor for any reason, and it is the most common indication for cesarean delivery in nulliparous women and the second most common indication for cesarean delivery in multiparous women. In 2014, a large US multicenter cohort study showed increases in maternal and neonatal morbidities when the second stage was prolonged, including chorioamnionitis, postpartum hemorrhage, 3rd and 4th degree perineal laceration, shoulder dystocia, 5 minute Apgar score less than 4, neonatal admission to NICU and neonatal sepsis. Therefore, clinicians are challenged to consider alternative practices in order to maximize a mother's chance of a normal delivery and minimize these associated risks to both mother and baby. Mouth guards are used primarily in contact sports, and have been demonstrated to reduce or prevent injury to the teeth. Most commonly made of synthetic polymers, mouth guards function as a shock-absorber. Even among sports medicine literature, there is a call for more research into use and education about protective gear. Previous studies have shown that wearing a mouth guard increases the isometric strength of different muscle groups. Recent studies have begun to explore whether wearing a similar style mouth guard will shorten the duration of the second stage of labor. A recent randomized controlled pilot study including nulliparous women using a dental support device (DSD) during the second stage evaluated the length of the second stage and outcome thereof. They defined the second stage of labor as the time between complete cervical dilation and fetal expulsion. They found a significant decrease of 38% in the length of the second stage in the group that used a DSD. Additionally, there was a decreased rate of cesarean section in this group, however a p-value was not reported. This study only included 64 patients. A second, larger trial also looking at nulliparous women did not find a significant difference in length of second stage of labor however the rate of obstetrical interventions such as operative vaginal delivery and cesarean section were much higher in the control group due to prolonged second stage of labor. Though the results of the second study are contradictory in nature, the researchers do not provide hypotheses into why this may be. Our hypothesis is that using such a device would help women to push more effectively during the second stage of labor thus shortening the second stage and increasing the rate of spontaneous vaginal deliveries that do not require operative intervention. Developing a way to shorten the second stage of labor and reduce the number of cesarean sections or instrumental deliveries could reduce the morbidity of mothers and their infants and decrease health care spending.