The aim of this study is to evaluate the technical feasibility of the new tube placement technology in healthy volunteers and, if proven feasible, in critically ill patients requiring placement of a feeding tube.
Enteral feeding is the preferred route of nutrient delivery in hospitalized patients who cannot eat sufficiently. Placement of enteral feeding tubes carries a risk of misplacement especially in patients who are unable to fully collaborate during the tube placement due to neurological impairment and/or the presence of an artificial airway. The misplacement of a feeding tube in the airways has a high risk of severe complications, including pneumonia, mechanical damage of airways and the lung, and death. The verification of correct tube placement can be done using radiography, or interventions aimed at confirming the location of the tube tip by aspiration of gastric contents, and by auscultation during injection of air. Approximately 20-25 % of patients treated in intensive care units are likely to need placement of a feeding tube, while undergoing mechanical ventilation and having an artificial airway. This high risk patient group would benefit from technologies allowing direct visualization of tube placement. It is also expected that direct visualization of tube placement will allow confirmation of tube placement and therefore eliminate the need of radiography (radiation).
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
12
Placement of enteral feeding tubes
Universitätsklinik für Intensivmedizin
Bern, Switzerland
Success rate of postpyloric placement, time to reach intragastric and postpyloric position, ease of insertion, handling and image quality.
using a visual analog scale of 1-10, with 1 indicating the best value
Time frame: During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
In healthy volunteers, time required to reach gastric and postpyloric placement
Questionnaire with various positions and the time to reach the position
Time frame: During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
In healthy volunteers, ease of insertion, handling, and image quality assessed
Using a visual analog scale of 1-10, with 1 indicating the best value
Time frame: During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
In healthy volunteers, Usability of specific features - tip steerability, lens rinsing and flushing, air insufflation and fluid extraction
Using a visual analog scale of 1-10, with 1 indicating the best value.
Time frame: During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
In patients: Necessity of use of additional sedation/analgesia for the procedure in addition to already established sedation in the context of mechanical ventilation.
Questionnaire Yes/No and a visual analog scale of 1-10, with 1 indicating the best value
Time frame: During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
In patients: Ease of insertion, handling, and image quality assessed using a visual analog scale of 1-10, with 1 indicating the best value.
using a visual analog scale of 1-10, with 1 indicating the best value
Time frame: During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
In patients: Usability of specific features - tip steerability, lens rinsing and flushing, air insufflation and fluid extraction.
using a visual analog scale of 1-10, with 1 indicating the best value
Time frame: During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
In patients: Subjective global assessment of the intensivist on whether or not the technique is suitable for clinical use in patients.
using a visual analog scale of 1-10, with 1 indicating the best value
Time frame: During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
In patients: Time required to reach gastric and postpyloric placement
Questionnaire
Time frame: During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
In patients: Feasibility of the feeding through Veritract tube.
using a visual analog scale of 1-10, with 1 indicating the best value
Time frame: During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
Bleeding and infection related to tube placement
AE/SAE Questionnaire Yes/No
Time frame: During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
Erroneous placement in larynx and trachea and associated complications (pneumothorax).
Outcome mesured with a questionnaire Yes/No
Time frame: During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
Injuries of the oesophagus, stomach or small intestine related to tube placement.
Outcome mesured with a questionnaire Yes/No
Time frame: During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
Reflux of stomach contents during tube placement
AE/SAE Questionnaire Yes/No
Time frame: During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours