The investigators propose a home hospital model of care that substitutes for treatment in an acute care hospital. Limited studies of the home hospital model have demonstrated that a sizeable proportion of acute care can be delivered in the home with equal quality and safety, reduced cost, and improved patient experience.
Hospitals are the standard of care for acute illness in the United States, but hospital care is expensive and often unsafe, especially for older individuals. While admitted, 20% suffer delirium, over 5% contract hospital-acquired infections, and most lose functional status that is never regained. Timely access to inpatient care is poor: many hospital wards are typically over 100% capacity, and emergency department waits can be protracted. Moreover, hospital care is increasingly costly: many internal medicine admissions have a negative margin (i.e., expenditures exceed hospital revenues) and incur patient debt. The investigators propose a home hospital model of care that substitutes for treatment in an acute care hospital. Studies of the home hospital model have demonstrated that a sizeable proportion of acute care can be delivered in the home with equal quality and safety, 20% reduced cost, and 20% improved patient experience. While this is the standard of care in several developed countries, only 2 non-randomized demonstration projects have been conducted in the United States, each with highly local needs. Taken together, home hospital evidence is promising but falls short due to non-robust experimental design, failure to implement modern medical technology, and poor enlistment of community support. The home hospital module offers most of the same medical components that are standard of care in an acute care hospital. The typical staff (medical doctor \[MD\], registered nurse \[RN\], case manager), diagnostics (blood tests, vital signs, telemetry, x-ray, and ultrasound), intravenous therapy, and oxygen/nebulizer therapy will all be available for home hospital. Optional deployment of food services, home health aide, physical therapist, occupational therapist, and social worker will be tailored to patient need. Home hospital improves upon the components of a typical ward's standard of care in several ways: Point of care blood diagnostics (results at the bedside in \<5 minutes); Minimally invasive continuous vital signs, telemetry, activity tracking, and sleep tracking; On-demand 24/7 clinician video visits; 4 to 1 patient to MD ratio, compared to typical 16 to 1; Ambulatory/portable infusion pumps that can be worn on the hip; Optional access to a personal home health aide Should a matter be emergent (that is, requiring in-person assistance in less than 20 minutes), then 9-1-1 will be called and the patient will be returned to the hospital immediately. In previous iterations of home hospital this happens in about 2% of patients. Clinical parameters measured will be at the discretion of the physician and nurse, who treat the participant following evidence-based practice guidelines, just as in the usual care setting. In addition, the investigators will be tracking a wide variety of measures of quality and safety, including some measures tailored to each primary diagnosis.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
3,000
See above
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
RECRUITINGBrigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
RECRUITINGTotal direct cost of hospitalization, $
Time frame: From date of admission to date of discharge, an expected average of 4 days
Direct margin, $
Direct margin from total cost of hospitalization
Time frame: From date of admission to date of discharge, an expected average of 4 days
Direct margin, modeled with backfill
Backfill uses a model that estimates the cost of patients who take the place of home hospital patients
Time frame: From date of admission to date of discharge, an expected average of 4 days
Total cost, 30-day post discharge
Time frame: Day of admission to 30-days post-discharge
Length of stay, days
Time frame: From date of admission to date of discharge, an expected average of 4 days
Imaging, #
Count of any diagnostic imaging (for example, x-ray, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, and nuclear imaging) that occurred through the course of the hospitalization.
Time frame: From date of admission to date of discharge, an expected average of 4 days
Lab orders, #
Count of any lab order (for example, basic metabolic panel, complete blood count, hepatic function panel) that occurred through the course of the hospitalization.
Time frame: From date of admission to date of discharge, an expected average of 4 days
All-cause readmission(s) after index, #
Time frame: Day of discharge to 30 days later
All-cause readmission(s) after index, y/n
Time frame: Day of discharge to 30 days later
Unplanned readmission(s) after index, #
Time frame: Day of discharge to 30 days later
Unplanned readmission(s) after index, y/n
Time frame: Day of discharge to 30 days later
Emergency Department observation stay(s) after index hospitalization, #
Time frame: Day of discharge to 30 days later
Emergency Department observation stay(s) after index hospitalization, y/n
Time frame: Day of discharge to 30 days later
Emergency Department visit(s) after index hospitalization, #
Time frame: Day of discharge to 30 days later
Emergency Department visit(s) after index hospitalization, y/n
Time frame: Day of discharge to 30 days later
Delirium, y/n
Time frame: From date of admission to date of discharge, an expected average of 4 days
Transfer back to hospital, y/n
Time frame: From date of admission to date of discharge, an expected average of 4 days
Hours of sleep per day, #
Time frame: From date of admission to date of discharge, an expected average of 4 days
Hours of activity per day, #
Time frame: From date of admission to date of discharge, an expected average of 4 days
Hours of sitting upright per day, #
Time frame: From date of admission to date of discharge, an expected average of 4 days
Steps per day, #
Time frame: From date of admission to date of discharge, an expected average of 4 days
EuroQol-5D-5L, composite score
Time frame: At admission, at discharge (the day the patient leaves the hospital environment), and at 30 days after discharge
Short Form 1
1-5 Likert scale: Excellent, very good, good, fair poor
Time frame: 30 days prior to admission (asked on day of admission), at admission, at discharge (the day the patient leaves the hospital environment), and at 30 days after discharge
Activities of daily living, score
Time frame: 30 days prior to admission (asked on day of admission), at admission, at discharge (the day the patient leaves the hospital environment), and at 30 days after discharge
Instrumental activities of daily living, score
Time frame: 30 days prior to admission (asked on day of admission), at admission, at discharge (the day the patient leaves the hospital environment), and at 30 days after discharge
3-item Care Transition Measure, score
Time frame: 30 days after discharge
Picker Experience Questionnaire, score
Time frame: 30 days after discharge
Global satisfaction with care, score
Time frame: 30 days after discharge
Qualitative interview
Time frame: 30 days after discharge
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.