This is a randomized, open-label, multi-center, global, phase III study to determine the efficacy and safety of Durvalumab + BCG combination therapy in the treatment of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer
Patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive treatment with Durvalumab + BCG combination therapies, or Standard of Care (SoC) therapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
1,018
Investigational product
Standard of care
The efficacy of Durvalumab + BCG (induction plus maintenance) combination therapy compared to SoC in terms of Disease free survival (DFS) in patients with NMIBC
Disease-free survival using Investigator disease assessments.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
To assess the efficacy of durvalumab + BCG (induction and maintenance) combination therapy compared to BCG (induction and maintenance) alone in terms of DFS 24 months
Proportion of patients alive and disease free at 24 months using Investigator disease assessments. DFS24 is defined as the proportion of patients alive and disease-free at 24 months after randomization, per Investigator disease assessment.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
To assess the efficacy of durvalumab + BCG (induction and maintenance) combination therapy compared to BCG (induction and maintenance) alone in terms of OS5
Overall survival at 5 years. Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy or receives another anti-cancer therapy (i.e. date of death or censoring - date of randomization +1). Any patient not known to have died at the time of analysis will be censored based on the last recorded date on which the patient was known to be alive
Time frame: Up to 7 years
To assess the efficacy of durvalumab + BCG (induction and maintenance) combination therapy compared to BCG (induction and maintenance) alone in terms of any disease-free survival
Any disease-free survival using Investigator disease assessments. Any disease-free survival (aDFS) is defined similarly as DFS, except that aDFS includes recurrence of low/medium risk NMIBC. This will be based on Investigator disease assessments.
Time frame: Up to 7 years
To assess the efficacy of durvalumab + BCG (induction and maintenance) combination therapy compared to BCG (induction and maintenance) alone in terms of Time to MIBC and/or Metastatic Disease
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Research Site
Auchenflower, Australia
Research Site
Box Hill, Australia
Research Site
Brisbane, Australia
Research Site
Kogarah, Australia
Research Site
Orange, Australia
Research Site
Parkville, Australia
Research Site
Westmead, Australia
Research Site
Wollongong, Australia
Research Site
Graz, Austria
Research Site
Innsbruck, Austria
...and 110 more locations
Time to MIBC and/or metastatic disease using Investigator disease assessments. Time to MIBC and/or metastatic disease is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of first documented MIBC and/or metastatic disease as assessed by Investigator. Time to MIBC and/or metastatic disease does not include deaths. If patients died without MIBC and/or metastatic disease, they will be censored at the time of death. All other censoring rules per DFS analysis will be applied including censoring patients with an event after 2 missed visits and patients with no evaluable disease assessments or no baseline data.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
To assess the efficacy of durvalumab + BCG (induction and maintenance) combination therapy compared to BCG (induction and maintenance) alone with respect to time to cystectomy
Time to cystectomy using Investigator disease assessments. Time to cystectomy is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of cystectomy as reported by Investigator. Patients who died prior to cystectomy will be censored at the time of death. Patients who have not had a cystectomy at the time of analysis will be censored at the last recorded date on which the patient was known to be alive. No other censoring rules per the DFS analysis will be applied.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
To assess the efficacy of durvalumab + BCG (induction and maintenance) combination therapy compared to BCG (induction and maintenance) alone in terms of time to development of upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Time to development of upper tract urothelial carcinoma using Investigator disease assessments. Time to development of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (TTUTUC) is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of development of upper tract urothelial carcinoma as assessed by Investigator using CT urography or ureteroscopy (less common). TTUTUC does not include deaths. Patients who died without upper tract urothelial carcinoma will be censored at the time of death. Other censoring rules per DFS analysis will be applied, including censoring patients with no baseline data but excluding censoring patients with an event after 2 missed visits as evaluation of the upper urinary tract is not part of regular disease assessment and is performed as clinically indicated.
Time frame: Up to 7 years
To assess the efficacy of durvalumab + BCG (induction only) combination therapy compared to BCG (induction and maintenance) alone in terms of Disease-free survival
Any disease-free survival (aDFS) is defined similarly as DFS, except that aDFS includes recurrence of low/medium risk NMIBC. This will be based on Investigator disease assessments.
Time frame: Up to 7 years
To assess the efficacy of durvalumab + BCG (induction only) combination therapy compared to BCG (induction and maintenance) alone in terms of patients alive and disease free at 24 months
Proportion of patients alive and disease free at 24 months using Investigator disease assessments. DFS24 is defined as the proportion of patients alive and disease-free at 24 months after randomization, per Investigator disease assessment
Time frame: Up to 24 months
To assess the efficacy of durvalumab + BCG (induction only) combination therapy compared to BCG (induction and maintenance) alone in terms of OS5
Overall survival at 5 years. Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy or receives another anti-cancer therapy (i.e. date of death or censoring - date of randomization +1).
Time frame: up to 5 years
To assess the efficacy of durvalumab + BCG (induction only) combination therapy compared to BCG (induction and maintenance) alone in terms of any disease-free survival
Any disease-free survival using Investigator disease assessments. Any disease-free survival (aDFS) is defined similarly as DFS, except that aDFS includes recurrence of low/medium risk NMIBC. This will be based on Investigator disease assessments.
Time frame: Up to 7 years
To assess the efficacy of durvalumab + BCG (induction only) combination therapy compared to BCG (induction and maintenance) alone in terms of Time to MIBC and/or metastatic disease
Time to MIBC and/or metastatic disease using Investigator disease assessments. Time to MIBC and/or metastatic disease is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of first documented MIBC and/or metastatic disease as assessed by Investigator. Time to MIBC and/or metastatic disease does not include deaths. If patients died without MIBC and/or metastatic disease, they will be censored at the time of death. All other censoring rules per DFS analysis will be applied including censoring patients with an event after 2 missed visits and patients with no evaluable disease assessments or no baseline data.
Time frame: Up to 7 years
To assess the efficacy of durvalumab + BCG (induction only) combination therapy compared to BCG (induction and maintenance) alone in terms of time to cystectomy
Time to cystectomy using Investigator disease assessments. Time to cystectomy is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of cystectomy as reported by Investigator. Patients who died prior to cystectomy will be censored at the time of death. Patients who have not had a cystectomy at the time of analysis will be censored at the last recorded date on which the patient was known to be alive. No other censoring rules per the DFS analysis will be applied.
Time frame: Up to 7 years
To assess the efficacy of durvalumab + BCG (induction only) combination therapy compared to BCG (induction and maintenance) alone time to development of upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Time to development of upper tract urothelial carcinoma using Investigator disease assessments. Time to development of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (TTUTUC) is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of development of upper tract urothelial carcinoma as assessed by Investigator using CT urography or ureteroscopy (less common). TTUTUC does not include deaths. Patients who died without upper tract urothelial carcinoma will be censored at the time of death. Other censoring rules per DFS analysis will be applied, including censoring patients with no baseline data but excluding censoring patients with an event after 2 missed visits as evaluation of the upper urinary tract is not part of regular disease assessment and is performed as clinically indicated.
Time frame: Up to 7 years
To assess the efficacy of durvalumab + BCG (induction and maintenance) combination therapy compared to durvalumab + BCG (induction only) in terms of Disease-free survival
Disease-free survival using Investigator disease assessments.Any disease-free survival (aDFS) is defined similarly as DFS, except that aDFS includes recurrence of low/medium risk NMIBC. This will be based on Investigator disease assessments.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
To assess the efficacy of durvalumab + BCG (induction and maintenance) combination therapy compared to durvalumab + BCG (induction only) in terms of Proportion of patients alive and disease free at 24 months
Proportion of patients alive and disease free at 24 months using Investigator disease assessments. DFS24 is defined as the proportion of patients alive and disease-free at 24 months after randomization, per Investigator disease assessment.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
To assess the efficacy of durvalumab + BCG (induction and maintenance) combination therapy compared to durvalumab + BCG (induction only) in terms of Overall survival at 5 years
Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy or receives another anti-cancer therapy (i.e. date of death or censoring - date of randomization +1). The proportion of patients alive at 5 years (OS5)
Time frame: Up to 7 years
To assess the efficacy of durvalumab + BCG (induction and maintenance) combination therapy compared to durvalumab + BCG (induction only) in terms of any disease-free survival
Any disease-free survival using Investigator disease assessments. Any disease-free survival (aDFS) is defined similarly as DFS, except that aDFS includes recurrence of low/medium risk NMIBC. This will be based on Investigator disease assessments.
Time frame: up to 5 years
To assess the efficacy of durvalumab + BCG (induction and maintenance) combination therapy compared to durvalumab + BCG (induction only) in terms of time to MIBC and/or metastatic disease
Time to MIBC and/or metastatic disease using Investigator disease assessments. Time to MIBC and/or metastatic disease is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of first documented MIBC and/or metastatic disease as assessed by Investigator. Time to MIBC and/or metastatic disease does not include deaths. If patients died without MIBC and/or metastatic disease, they will be censored at the time of death. All other censoring rules per DFS analysis will be applied including censoring patients with an event after 2 missed visits and patients with no evaluable disease assessments or no baseline data.
Time frame: up to 5 yeas
To assess the efficacy of durvalumab + BCG (induction and maintenance) combination therapy compared to durvalumab + BCG (induction only) in terms of time to cystectomy
Time to cystectomy using Investigator disease assessments. Time to cystectomy is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of cystectomy as reported by Investigator. Patients who died prior to cystectomy will be censored at the time of death. Patients who have not had a cystectomy at the time of analysis will be censored at the last recorded date on which the patient was known to be alive. No other censoring rules per the DFS analysis will be applied.
Time frame: up to 5 years
To assess the efficacy of durvalumab + BCG (induction and maintenance) combination therapy compared to durvalumab + BCG (induction only) in terms of Time to development of upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Time to development of upper tract urothelial carcinoma using Investigator disease assessments. Time to development of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (TTUTUC) is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of development of upper tract urothelial carcinoma as assessed by Investigator using CT urography or ureteroscopy (less common). TTUTUC does not include deaths. Patients who died without upper tract urothelial carcinoma will be censored at the time of death. Other censoring rules per DFS analysis will be applied, including censoring patients with no baseline data but excluding censoring patients with an event after 2 missed visits as evaluation of the upper urinary tract is not part of regular disease assessment and is performed as clinically indicated.
Time frame: up to 5 years
Complete response rate (CRR) at 6 months using Investigator disease assessments
To assess the efficacy of durvalumab + BCG combination therapy compared to BCG (induction and maintenance) for patients with CIS prior to study entry or at baseline cystoscopy.
Time frame: up to 6 months
EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-NMIBC24
To assess disease-related symptoms and HRQoL in patients with NMIBC treated with durvalumab + BCG (induction and maintenance) combination therapy and durvalumab + BCG (induction only) combination therapy compared to BCG (induction and maintenance) alone and compared to each other using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and the EORTC QLQ-NMIBC24 questionnaire
Time frame: up to 5 years
PRO version of the CTCAE with approximately 19 items (PRO-CTCAE) symptoms in countries where language is available
To assess patient-reported treatment tolerability directly using specific PRO-CTCAE symptoms
Time frame: up to 5 years
PK serum concentration of durvalumab
To assess the PK of durvalumab when used in combination with BCG treatment
Time frame: up to 5 years
Presence of ADAs for durvalumab
To investigate the immunogenicity of durvalumab when used in combination with BCG treatment
Time frame: up to 5 years