This is a randomized, open-label, multi-center, global, phase III study to determine the efficacy and safety of Durvalumab + BCG combination therapy in the treatment of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer
Patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive treatment with Durvalumab + BCG combination therapies, or Standard of Care (SoC) therapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
1,018
Investigational product
Standard of care
The efficacy of Durvalumab + BCG (induction plus maintenance) combination therapy compared to SoC in terms of Disease free survival (DFS) in patients with NMIBC
Time frame: Up to 4 years
The efficacy of Durvalumab + BCG (induction plus maintenance) therapy compare to SoC in terms of DFS after 24 months of last subject's last dose of IP
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Disease-related symptoms and HRQoL in patients with NMIBC treated with Durvalumab + BCG combination therapies compared to SoC and compared to each other using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire
EORTC QLQ-C30 measures cancer patients' functioning (HRQoL) and symptoms for all cancer types and consists of functional, symptom and a global measure of health status scales
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Patient-reported treatment tolerability using specific PRO CTCAE symptoms
Time frame: Up to 4 years
The serum concentration of Durvalumab plus BCG combination therapies
Time frame: Up to 4 years
The immunogenicity of Durvalumab when used in combination with BCG treatment assessed by descriptive summary of presence of ADAs
Serum will be tested for the presence of anti-drug antibodies.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
The efficacy of Durvalumab + BCG (induction plus maintenance) therapy compare to SoC in terms of OS
Time frame: Up to 7 years
The efficacy of Durvalumab + BCG (induction plus maintenance) combination therapy compared to SoC in terms of time to muscle invasive bladder cancer and/or metastatic disease
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Research Site
Auchenflower, Australia
Research Site
Box Hill, Australia
Research Site
Brisbane, Australia
Research Site
Kogarah, Australia
Research Site
Orange, Australia
Research Site
Parkville, Australia
Research Site
Westmead, Australia
Research Site
Wollongong, Australia
Research Site
Graz, Austria
Research Site
Innsbruck, Austria
...and 110 more locations
Time frame: Up to 7 years
The efficacy of Durvalumab + BCG (induction only) combination therapy compared to SoC in terms of DFS after 24 months of last subject's last dose of IP
Time frame: Up to 4 years
The efficacy of Durvalumab + BCG combination therapies compared to each other in terms of DFS after 24 months of last subject's last dose of IP
Time frame: Up to 4 years
The efficacy of Durvalumab + BCG (induction only) combination therapy compared to SoC in terms of OS
Time frame: Up to 7 years
The efficacy of Durvalumab + BCG combination therapies compared to each other in terms of OS
Time frame: Up to 7 years
The efficacy of Durvalumab + BCG (induction only) combination therapy compared to SoC in terms of time to muscle invasive bladder cancer and/or metastatic disease
Time frame: Up to 7 years
The efficacy of Durvalumab + BCG combination therapies compared to each other in terms of time to muscle invasive bladder cancer and/or metastatic disease
Time frame: Up to 7 years
Disease-related symptoms and HRQoL in patients with NMIBC treated with Durvalumab + BCG combination therapies compared to SoC and compared to each other using the the EORTC QLQ NMIBC24 questionnaire
EORTC QLQ-NMIBC24 assesses disease-specific symptoms of patients with intermediate to high-risk NMIBC.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
The efficacy of durvalumab + BCG combination therapy compared to SoC in terms of CRR for patients with CIS prior to study entry or at baseline cystoscopy
CRR at 6 months in patients with CIS prior to the study entry or at baseline cystoscopy
Time frame: Up to 4 years