The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate superiority of the Absorb scaffold compared to the Sequent Please Drug Coated Balloon when treating patients with In-Stent-Restenosis (ISR).
Absorb ISR is randomized-controlled trial of Absorb scaffold vs. Sequent Please drug coated balloon in an all-comers population with in-stent-restenosis. The patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion and the investigators intend to include 150 patients. Repeat coronary angiography will be performed 9 months post intervention in all subjects. Optical coherence tomography will be performed at baseline and at 9 months in both groups. All patients presenting with ISR and requiring percutaneous coronary intervention will be eligible to be included in this study. This will include patients with stable angina and those presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
53
PCI procedure for treatment of ISR with DEB - Sequent Please - inflation
PCI procedure for treatment of ISR with Absorb BVS implantation
Angiographic late lumen loss at 9 months
Late lumen loss will be calculated based on index and control coronary angiography.
Time frame: 9 months
- Incidence of periprocedural complications: unplanned use of GP IIb/IIIa (Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa) inhibitors, vessel rupture, side branch occlusion, peri-procedural myocardial infarction
Periprocedural complications will be analyzed as combined endpoint and separately for all defined complication.
Time frame: 9 months
- Comparison of rate of restenosis between both groups and in specific populations (patients with acute coronary syndromes, patients with diabetes, patients with long lesions (> 25 mm))
The angiographic parameter will be compared separately in all defined subgroups.
Time frame: 9 months
- Comparison of minimal luminal diameter between both groups and in specific populations (patients with acute coronary syndromes, patients with diabetes, patients with long lesions (> 25 mm))
The angiographic parameter will be compared separately in all defined subgroups.
Time frame: 9 months
- Comparison of diameter stenosis between both groups and in specific populations (patients with acute coronary syndromes, patients with diabetes, patients with long lesions (> 25 mm))
The angiographic parameter will be compared separately in all defined subgroups.
Time frame: 9 months
- Incidence of in-stent-restenosis, target lesion failure, target vessel revascularisation, stent thrombosis in in-hospital and long-term observation
Four clinical complications will be compared separately between study groups.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 9 months
- Early, late and very late probable or definite stent thrombosis
Detailed description of all events of stent thrombosis will be presented.
Time frame: 9 months
- Cardiac and non-cardiac death in both groups
The frequency of deaths in both study group will be presented with differentiation according to the primary cause of the event.
Time frame: 9 months
- Assessment of possibility vessel measurement and stent diameter/length choice based on this measurement performed in OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography)
The usefulness of OCT for stent choice will be analyzed. The frequency of procedures, when stent choice was done based on OCT measurements will be presented.
Time frame: During index procedure.
- Result of index procedure assessment in OCT post procedure - lumen area.
The OCT parameter describing of stent implantation result during index procedure will be compared between study groups.
Time frame: During index procedure.
- Result of index procedure assessment in OCT post procedure - stent area.
The OCT parameter describing of stent implantation result during index procedure will be compared between study groups.
Time frame: During index procedure.
- Result of index procedure assessment in OCT post procedure - struts apposition assessment.
The OCT parameter - frequency of strut malapposition - describing of stent implantation result during index procedure will be compared between study groups.
Time frame: During index procedure.
- Result of index procedure assessment in OCT post procedure - dissections.
The OCT parameter describing of stent implantation result during index procedure will be compared between study groups.
Time frame: During index procedure.
- Result of index procedure assessment in OCT post procedure - stent expansion index.
The OCT parameter describing of stent implantation result during index procedure will be compared between study groups.
Time frame: During index procedure.
- OCT assessment of long-term study results - lumen area.
The OCT parameter describing of stent implantation result in long term FU (follow-up) will be compared between study groups.
Time frame: 9 months
- OCT assessment of long-term study results - stent area.
The OCT parameter describing of stent implantation result in long term FU (follow-up) will be compared between study groups.
Time frame: 9 months
- OCT assessment of long-term study results - struts apposition assessment.
The OCT parameter describing of stent implantation result in long term FU (follow-up) will be compared between study groups.
Time frame: 9 months
- OCT assessment of long-term study results - neointimal volume.
The OCT parameter describing of stent implantation result in long term FU (follow-up) will be compared between study groups.
Time frame: 9 months
- OCT assessment of long-term study results - lumen volume.
The OCT parameter describing of stent implantation result in long term FU (follow-up) will be compared between study groups.
Time frame: 9 months
- Lumen volume change between index and 9M (nine months) FU in OCT.
The change of OCT parameter describing of stent implantation result will be compared between index procedure and in long term FU for both study groups.
Time frame: 9 months
- Minimal lumen area change between index and 9M (nine months) FU in OCT.
The OCT parameter describing of stent implantation result will be compared between index procedure and in long term FU for both study groups.
Time frame: 9 months