This is a single-center pilot study to be conducted at Massachusetts General Hospital. The purpose of this study is to examine the non-pharmacological impact of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) on gastroparesis symptoms and other clinical co-comorbidities such as pain, depression, anxiety, and catastrophizing. CBT trial patients will undergo careful phenotyping pre- and post- intervention with brain MRI, autonomic function test (AFT), gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES), and nutrient drink test (NDT) to determine the impact of CBT on these metrics in patients with gastroparesis. Characterization of these relationships or lack thereof can help guide future development of more targeted approaches and optimize treatment strategies for gastroparesis.
This randomized, controlled trial will examine the effects of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) on gastroparesis symptoms (including pain related brain circuitry). CBT reduces pain intensity, negative affect, and disability among patients with chronic pain, though there is a good deal of individual variability in treatment effects. Treatment gains following CBT are maintained or enhanced at 6 to 12-month follow-up. This study will examine the brain circuitry underlying these effects. In addition, as measures of gastroparesis symptoms and pain are correlated with other, more general, measures of negative affect (e.g., depression, anxiety), we will evaluate the specificity of the hypothesized effects by running the proposed statistical models both with and without inclusion of these conceptually overlapping factors. Based on pervious findings and published data, we expect that treatment-associated changes in pain and depression will likely share 10-20% of their variance. Treatment sessions will use active, structured techniques to alter distorted thoughts, with a focus on acquiring and practicing cognitive and emotional modulatory skills. CBT is based on a pain self-management paradigm, and involves the identification and reduction of maladaptive pain-related cognitions (i.e., catastrophizing) using techniques such as relaxation, thought-stopping, distraction, etc. CBT prominently emphasizes in-vivo practice during each session, and features home practice using written exercises. In particular, cognitive restructuring is used to help patients recognize the relationships between thoughts, feelings and behaviors. Patients learn to identify, evaluate, and challenge negative thoughts. In our protocol, each of the 8 weekly sessions will last for approximately 90 minutes and will be conducted or supervised by a trained psychologist. Following CBT, negative emotions are no longer closely linked to pain, suggesting that CBT provides patients with the skills to modulate and buffer their negative emotions such as catastrophizing. Subjects will undergo pre- and post-treatment testing through a variety of methods including brain MRI with associated physiological data, autonomic function test (AFT), gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES), and nutrient drink test (NDT) to determine the impact of CBT on these metrics in patients with gastroparesis. Characterization of these relationships or lack thereof can help guide future development of more targeted approaches and optimize treatment strategies for gastroparesis.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
29
Treatment sessions will use active, structured techniques to alter distorted thoughts, with a focus on acquiring and practicing cognitive and emotional modulatory skills. In particular, cognitive restructuring is used to help patients recognize the relationships between thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. Patients learn to identify, evaluate, and challenge negative thoughts. Patients will also learn behavioral strategies to decrease avoidance behavior and increase toleration of physical sensations.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
RECRUITINGPatient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM)
One of the primary endpoints will be change in gastroparesis symptom severity by the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Inventory (GCSI). The GCSI is comprised of three subscales: post-prandial fullness/early satiety, nausea/vomiting, and bloating. A one-point decrease in the GCSI has been validated to indicate clinically significant improvement.
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Gastrointestinal symptom assessment via Short Form 36 Health Survey
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Gastrointestinal symptom assessment via Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders - Quality of Life
Another primary endpoint will be a change in gastroparesis-related quality of life, as assessed by the Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms - Quality of Life (PAGI-QOL).
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Gastrointestinal symptom assessment via Rome III Diagnostic Questionnaire for Adult Functional GI Disorders
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Gastrointestinal symptom assessment via Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
The HADS contains subscales for anxiety and depression (7 items each, scored 0-3) and will be used to explored as a potential moderator of treatment outcome.
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Gastrointestinal symptom assessment via Patient Health Questionnaire
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Gastrointestinal symptom assessment via PainDETECT
The questionnaire is scored on a scale of 0-38. Scores of 0-12 indicate that a neuropathic pain component is unlikely (\>15%), scores of 13-18 are ambiguous, however a neuropathic pain component can be present, and scores of 18-36 indicate that a neuropathic pain component is likely (\>90%). We will use the PainDETECT to explore neuropathic pain severity as a potential moderator of treatment outcome
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Gastrointestinal symptom assessment via Pain Catastrophizing Scale
This questionnaire assesses a patient's level of pain-related worry across three areas: rumination, helplessness, and magnification. The questionnaire lists 12 reactions to pain and asks subjects to identify how often they have these reactions on a scale of 0-4, for a maximum possible total score of 56. We will use the Pain Catastrophizing Scale to explore pain-related worry as a potential mechanism of change in CBT.
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Gastrointestinal symptom assessment via Neuropathy Total Symptoms Score
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Gastrointestinal symptom assessment via PTSD Questionnaire - PCL-5
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Gastrointestinal symptom assessment via Brief Pain Inventory
This questionnaire assesses pain in gastroparesis patients
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Gastrointestinal symptom assessment via Early Life Trauma Inventory Self Report - Short Form
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Gastrointestinal symptom assessment via Coping Strategies Questionnaire
This questionnaire assess an array of pain coping methods such as distraction
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Gastrointestinal symptom assessment via Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire
This questionnaire measures perceived self-efficacy for managing various aspects of pain.
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Gastrointestinal symptom assessment via Eysenck Personality Inventory
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Gastrointestinal symptom assessment via Perceived Stress Scale
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Structural fMRI, resting fMRI, fMRI during catastrophizing test
Time frame: Baseline, and up to 2 hours post-intervention
Multivoxel 3D Proton Resonance Spectroscopy
Time frame: Baseline, and up to 2 hours post-intervention
Autonomic Function Testing (AFT)
We will use an autonomic functioning test (AFT) using the ANX 3,0 autonomic monitoring system. Autonomic parameters computed by the ANX 3.0 system included the following parameters: sympathetic activity (LFa), parasympathetic activity (RFa), and sympathovagal balance (LFa/RFa). We will use the AFT to explore autonomic function as a potential mechanism of change in CBT.
Time frame: Baseline, and up to 1 hour post-intervention
Abdominal Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)
The QST assesses subject response to sharp prick and pressure sensations on the arm, finger, and abdomen. We will examine temporal summation from the abdominal QST as a potential mechanism of change in CBT.
Time frame: Baseline, and up to 1 hour post-intervention
Electrogastrogram acquired during MRI scans
Time frame: Baseline, and up to 2 hour post-intervention
Electrocardiogram acquired during MRI scans
Time frame: Baseline, and up to 2 hour post-intervention
Respiration during MRI scans
Time frame: Baseline, and up to 2 hour post-intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.