Insomnia is a common and distressing symptom for patients on hemodialysis (HD), and there is evidence for a much larger impact on the health of patients. Chronic insomnia is disrupted sleep that occurs at least three nights per week and lasts at least three months. The SLEEP-HD study is a randomized open-label clinical trial to compare two types of treatment for insomnia in participants who have end-stage renal disease on HD, and who have been diagnosed with chronic insomnia. The two types of treatment involved in the study are Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) or treatment with a drug (trazodone vs placebo). 126 participants will be enrolled who are undergoing HD in two study locations (Seattle, Washington and Albuquerque, New Mexico).
Most HD patients have significant impairments in quality of life, largely from the high frequency of disabling symptoms. Insomnia is one of the most frequently reported symptoms and studies of HD patients and/or other populations suggest that it is a significant contributor to other common symptoms and poor health outcomes. There are unique contributors to chronic insomnia in HD patients and these include the biologic effects of residual uremia after partial correction as is achieved with current dialysis technology, maladaptation to treatment schedules, and patients' napping during treatments. There is a compelling need to identify effective treatments for insomnia in HD patients and the interventions being studied in this clinical trial, telehealth cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) and trazodone, have a strong scientific premise. If telehealth (web-based) CBT-I is effective for insomnia in HD patients, it will make a treatment that is presently inaccessible available to patients. Trazodone is widely used but the data on efficacy for insomnia are limited; no such data exist for HD patients. SLEEP-HD is a parallel group randomized controlled trial wherein 125 HD patients with chronic insomnia, treated in community-based dialysis facilities in Seattle and Albuquerque, will be randomized 1:1:1 over 31 months to 6-week treatment with telehealth CBT-I, trazodone, or medication placebo.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
126
Once weekly treatment sessions for 6 weeks. The content of each of these sessions will be adapted to include changes in behavior during HD treatments (such as napping) and to help patients better adjust to treatment schedules. The CBT-I sessions will be delivered by a therapist face-to-face with the patient via a fully interactive video telehealth platform.
trazodone tablet
Inactive pill manufactured to mimic trazodone tablets.
Northwest Kidney Centers
Seattle, Washington, United States
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) Short-term
summary score obtained from the ISI, measuring insomnia, range from 0 to 28. Higher score indicates greater insomnia, at Week 7 describing the short-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 7
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) Long-term
summary score obtained from the ISI, measuring insomnia, range from 0 to 28. Higher score indicates greater insomnia, at Week 25 describing the long-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 25
Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) - Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index - Short-term
Score from Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, measuring sleep quality, range 0 to 21. Higher scores indicates worse sleep quality: at Week 7 describing the short-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 7
Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) - Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index - Long-term
Score from Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, measuring sleep quality, range 0 to 21. Higher scores indicates worse sleep quality: at Week 25 describing the long-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 25
Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) - Epworth Sleepiness Scale - Short-term
Score from Epworth Sleepiness Scale, measuring sleepiness, range 0 to 24. Higher scores indicates greater sleepiness: at Week 7 describing the short-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 7
Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) - Epworth Sleepiness Scale - Long-term
Score from Epworth Sleepiness Scale, measuring sleepiness, range 0 to 24. Higher scores indicates greater sleepiness: at Week 25 describing the long-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 25
Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) - FACIT Fatigue Scale- Short-term
Score from FACIT Fatigue Scale, measuring fatigue, range 0 to 52. Higher scores indicates greater fatigue: at Week 7 describing the short-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 7
Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) - FACIT Fatigue Scale- Long-term
Score from FACIT Fatigue Scale, measuring fatigue, range 0 to 52. Higher scores indicates greater fatigue: at Week 25 describing the long-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 25
Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) - Graded Chronic Pain Scale - Short-term
Score from first item Graded Chronic Pain scale, measuring pain, range 0 to 10. Higher scores indicates greater pain: at Week 7 describing the short-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 7
Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) - Graded Chronic Pain Scale - Long-term
Score from first item Graded Chronic Pain scale, measuring pain, range 0 to 10. Higher scores indicates greater pain: at Week 25 describing the long-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 25
Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) - Graded Chronic Pain Scale - Interference - Short-term
Score from Second Item Graded Chronic Pain scale, measuring pain interference, range 0 to 10. Higher scores indicates greater interference from pain: at Week 7 describing the short-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 7
Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) - Graded Chronic Pain Scale - Interference - Long-term
Score from Second Item Graded Chronic Pain scale, measuring pain interference, range 0 to 10. Higher scores indicates greater interference from pain: at Week 25 describing the long-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 25
Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) - Patient Health Questionnaire 9 - Short-term
Score from Patient Health Questionnaire 9, measuring depression, range 0 to 27. Higher scores indicates greater depression: at Week 7 describing the short-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 7
Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) - Patient Health Questionnaire 9 - Long-term
Score from Patient Health Questionnaire 9, measuring depression, range 0 to 27. Higher scores indicates greater depression: at Week 25 describing the long-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 25
Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) - Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 Scale - Short-term
Score from Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 Scale, measuring anxiety, range 0 to 21. Higher scores indicates greater anxiety: at Week 7 describing the short-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 7
Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) - Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 Scale - Long-term
Score from Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 Scale, measuring anxiety, range 0 to 21. Higher scores indicates greater anxiety: at Week 25 describing the long-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 25
Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) - Quality of Life Short Form 12 Scale - Physical Component Score - Short-term
Score from Quality of Life Short Form 12 scale - Physical Component Score, measuring quality of life, range 0 to 100. Higher scores indicates better quality of life: at Week 7 describing the short-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 7
Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) - Quality of Life Short Form 12 Scale - Physical Component Score - Long-term
Score from Quality of Life Short Form 12 scale - Physical Component Score, measuring quality of life, range 0 to 100. Higher scores indicates better quality of life: at Week 25 describing the long-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 25
Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) - Quality of Life Short Form 12 Scale - Mental Component Score - Short-term
Score from Quality of Life Short Form 12 scale - Mental Component Score, measuring quality of life, range 0 to 100. Higher scores indicates better quality of life: at Week 7 describing the short-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 7
Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) - Quality of Life Short Form 12 Scale - Mental Component Score - Long-term
Score from Quality of Life Short Form 12 scale - Mental Component Score, measuring quality of life, range 0 to 100. Higher scores indicates better quality of life: at Week 25 describing the long-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 25
Cumulative Weekly Use of Sedatives/Hypnotics - Short-term
This will be defined, as the number of days that the patient took a drug to help sleep, range from 0 to 7: at Week 7 describing the short-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 7
Cumulative Weekly Use of Sedatives/Hypnotics - Long-term
This will be defined, as the number of days that the patient took a drug to help sleep, range from 0 to 7: at Week 25 describing the long-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 25
Objective Measure of Sleep - Short-term
Actigraphy measurement of average nighttime sleep efficiency (percent time asleep of time in bed): at Week 7 describing the short-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 7
Objective Measure of Sleep - Long-term
Actigraphy measurement of average nighttime sleep efficiency (percent time asleep of time in bed): at Week 25 describing the long-term effect of the intervention
Time frame: Week 25
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.