A phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, biological activity, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ND-L02-s0201 for Injection in subjects with IPF.
All subjects were treated with ND-L02-s0201 or placebo for 24 weeks (a total of 12 doses). Subject's participation in the study was approximately 40 weeks including a Screening and Baseline period of up to 6 weeks, a treatment period of 24 weeks (including the 2 weeks after the last study treatment), and a follow-up period of 10 weeks after End-of-Treatment (EOT).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
123
Intravenous administration every 2 weeks
Intravenous administration every 2 weeks
Saline
Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to TEAEs
The number of participants with TEAEs leading to discontinuation from the study treatment. The Safety Population (including all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment) is presented. TEAE = treatment-emergent adverse event
Time frame: Change in the incidence and severity of adverse events related to study treatment from baseline to 24 weeks
Rate of Decline in FVC From Baseline to Week 24
Slope in FVC from Baseline to Week 24 (measured in L/week). The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. Slope and standard error are presented. The slope is approximated as least square mean/24 weeks. FVC = forced vital capacity
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Rate of Decline in ppFVC From Baseline to Week 24
Slope in ppFVC from Baseline to Week 24 (measured in %/week). The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. Slope and standard error are presented. The slope is approximated as least square mean/24 weeks. ppFVC = percent predicted forced vital capacity
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Absolute and Relative Change in FVC (L) From Baseline to Week 24
Absolute and Relative Change in FVC (L) from Baseline to Week 24. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. FVC = forced vital capacity
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Percent Change in FVC From Baseline to Week 24
Percent Change in FVC from Baseline to Week 24. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. FVC = forced vital capacity
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Banner-University Medical Center Tucson Campus
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Amicis Research Center
Northridge, California, United States
University of California, San Francisco, Medical Center at Parnassus
San Francisco, California, United States
Mayo Clinic Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Central Florida Pulmonary Group, PA
Orlando, Florida, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, United States
OSF HealthCare Saint Francis Medical Center
Peoria, Illinois, United States
Norton Clinical Research Group
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
...and 23 more locations
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Absolute and Relative Change in ppFVC (%) From Baseline to Week 24
Absolute and Relative Change in ppFVC (%) from Baseline to Week 24. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. ppFVC = percent predicted forced vital capacity
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Percent Change in ppFVC From Baseline to Week 24
Percent Change in ppFVC from Baseline to Week 24. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. ppFVC = percent predicted forced vital capacity
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Summary of Study Treatment Response of FVC
Proportion of participants with an FVC response defined as either having improvement or a decline by 0 to less than or equal to 5%, more than 5% to less than or equal to 10%, and more than 10% at Visit 14 (Day 169). Participants with an FVC response were defined as improvement in FVC (ie, FVC value higher than baseline) or a decline of less than or equal to 10% from baseline. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. FVC = forced vital capacity
Time frame: Baseline to Visit 14 (Day 169)
Summary of Study Treatment Response of ppFVC
Proportion of participants with an ppFVC response defined as either having improvement or a decline by 0 to less than or equal to 5%, greater than 5% to less than or equal to 10%, and greater than 10% at Visit 14 (Day 169). Participants with an ppFVC response were defined as improvement in ppFVC (ie, ppFVC value higher than baseline) or a decline of less than or equal to 10% from baseline. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. ppFVC = percent predicted forced vital capacity
Time frame: Baseline to Visit 14 (Day 169)
Change in DLCO and DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24
Change in diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and DLCO corrected for hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg) from Baseline to Week 24. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Quantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCT
Changes of interstitial lung abnormalities as measured by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT; ie, change in parenchymal feature \[Baseline to Week 24\]), as determined by qualitative assessment (central radiologist) and quantitative analysis (Quantitative Lung Fibrosis - QLF analysis). Quantitative HRCT parameters included the following: * Quantitative Lung Fibrosis (QLF) score (% of whole lung field volume) * Ground glass opacity (GGO) (% of whole lung field volume) * Reticulation (% of whole lung field volume) * Honeycombing (% of whole lung field volume) * Normal lung (% of whole lung field volume) * Emphysema (low attenuation area \[LAA\]; % of whole lung field volume) The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Qualitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCT
Changes of interstitial lung abnormalities as measured by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT; ie, change in parenchymal feature \[Baseline to Visit 14 (Day 169)\]), as determined by qualitative assessment (central radiologist). The Likert scale values are included in the descriptions presented. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) with HRCT assessment at Visit 14/Early Termination is presented.
Time frame: Baseline to Visit 14 (Day 169)
Events of IPF Exacerbation or Death and Rate of First IPF Exacerbation
Total number of events of participants who experienced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) exacerbation (ie, an unexplained worsening of dyspnea, evidence of hypoxemia as defined by worsened or severely impaired gas exchange, new radiographic alveolar infiltrates, and an absence of an alternative explanation such as infection, pulmonary embolism, pneumothorax, or heart failure) or death (weeks).
Time frame: Baseline to study completion, up to Day 239
Events of Hospitalization for Respiratory Ailments or Death
Events (participants who experienced hospitalization for respiratory ailments or died) for respiratory ailments are presented. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented.
Time frame: up to 12 weeks after the end of study treatment
Total Events of Death Due to All Causes
Rate of mortality due to all causes is presented. Overall survival was defined as the time from start of study treatment to death due to any cause.
Time frame: up to 12 weeks after the end of study treatment
Events of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in Lung Transplantation or Death and Rate of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in Lung Transplantation
Events of deterioration of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) resulting in lung transplantation (LP; up to 12 weeks after the end of study treatment) or death (weeks) and rate of deterioration of IPF resulting in lung transplantation (up to 12 weeks after the end of study treatment) are presented. Total events = Participants who experience deterioration of IPF resulting in LP (or died). Rate of Deterioration = Rate of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in LP.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks after end of study treatment