Comparison of the astigmatism reducing effect of a toric IOL with a non toric IOL in eyes with low corneal astigmatism.
With increasing demands of patients concerning refractive outcome after cataract surgery, toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) that correct corneal astigmatism have been introduced more widely to cataract surgery. Originally, toric IOLs were used mainly for patients with high degrees of astigmatism. Since a couple of years, toric IOLs are available from numerous manufacturers to correct moderate amounts of astigmatism which are much more prevalent with about 8% having a corneal astigmatism of 2.0D or more in the cataract population. 5Using toric IOLs for these eyes results in less spectacle dependence of patients due to the astigmatic correction. Other astigmatism reducing techniques, such as peripheral corneal relaxing incisions and opposite clear corneal incisions were shown to be less predictable. Although the use of toric IOLs became the gold standard to correct corneal astigmatism during cataract surgery , there is still uncertainty, if low astigmatism should be corrected. Visser et al. showed that moderate astigmatism of than 1.5D should be corrected for monofocal IOLs and Hayashi showed that remaining astigmatism of 1.0D already decreases visual quality in eyes with multifocal IOLs. Although correction of low corneal astigmatism appears to be beneficial, some hurdles have to be taken into account. In eyes with low corneal astigmatism the accuracy of measuring the astigmatism meridian is relatively low. Furthermore, different corneal measurement techniques are not always comparable and it is difficult to know, which device shows the correct amount of astigmatism. Additionally, the correction of the spherical equivalent is of high importance, as a refractive surprise will also attenuate the astigmatism reducing effect of the toric IOL. Aim of this study is to assess, if toric IOLs are useful in patients with low amounts of corneal astigmatism and to quantify the sources of error in toric IOL power calculation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
25
cataract surgery with implantation of an toric intraocular lens
cataract surgery with implantation of a non toric intraocular lens
Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS)
Vienna, Austria
RECRUITINGSubjective refraction to detect remaining astigmatism (in Diopters) between both groups
Time frame: 12 months
Biometrical measurement of axial length (in mm), anterior chamber depth (in mm), corneal astigmatism (radii and axial degrees)
Time frame: 12 months
Purkinjemeter measurement of Tilt (in degrees) and Decentration (in degrees) of the intraocular lens
Time frame: 12 months
Wavefront analysis of high order aberrations (root mean square, in microns)
Time frame: 12 months
Questionnaire to asses patients subjective satisfaction with visual outcome
In the questionnaire the patient has to choose if different tasks (e.g. reading, driving, watching TV) are easier for him/ her with the right eye, the left eye, or if there is no difference between both eyes
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.