Comparison of time to ventilation based on the chest rising of the Airway Simulator between the iLTS-D and LMA Fastrach
Prior to the study every participant obtained a standardized instruction of each device. In the proposed clinical trial the primary study objective will be to determine whether there is a difference in time to ventilation via endotracheal tube (seconds) for the novel iLTS-D compared to the LMA Fastrach. Time to Ventilation will be defined from when the tip of the extraglottic airway device passed the incisors to the point until confirmation the first chest rise of the high fidelity simulator (Laerdal SimMan). Additionally, two time points before final tracheal placement will evaluated: time to place the EGA and time to ventilate with the EGA after introducing the device into the oral cavity.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
160
Time to ventilation (ET) based of insert the iLTS until the chest rise of the simulator in seconds
Time to ventilation (ET) based of insert the Fastrach until the chest rise of the simulator in seconds
Department of Anesthesiology,Prof. C. Werner, Universitätsmedizin of the JG University
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
Time to ventilation via endotracheal tube
time to ventilation will defined from when the Endotracheal tube insert into the extraglottic airway device until the first chest rise
Time frame: 0 to 300 seconds
Time to ventilation via extraglottic airway device
time to ventilation will defined from when the device tip passed the incisors to the point until the first chest rise
Time frame: 0 to 300 seconds
Intubation attempts
Numbers of successful intubation attempts (1-5 attempts)
Time frame: 0 to 300 seconds
Ease of Insertion
Subjective Grading of the insertion process (Lickert Scale from 1 very easy to 5 very difficult)
Time frame: 0 to 420 seconds
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.