This study will evaluate the efficacy of an alpha/delta ratio (ADR) neurofeedback training protocol on tinnitus distress. 1/3 of the participants in the study will undergo ADR neurofeedback training, 1/3 an active comparator, beta/theta ratio (BTR) neurofeedback training, whilst the final 1/3 of participants will fill in daily diaries of tinnitus complaints and symptoms for two weeks.
Tinnitus is hypothesized to originate as a result of a disturbance in the balance of excitatory and inhibitory neurons in central auditory structures. More specifically, inhibitory neurons hyperpolarize, by which their functional role is weakened . Consequently, this allows auditory neurons, deprived of input from a lesioned auditory system, to spontaneously synchronize their activity, resulting in the tinnitus percept. In the normal functioning auditory system, neurons firing synchronously in the alpha frequency region (8 - 12 Hz) have a gating function of inhibiting task-irrelevant regions in the brain. In people with chronic tinnitus, it has been observed, that alpha activity over temporal regions is weakened, thus leading to the spontaneous activity characterizing the condition. By upregulating alpha activity with neurofeedback training, it is hypothesized that the excitatory/inhibitory balance in temporal regions can be restored, thus minimizing the tinnitus percept. The coupling or exchange of information of distinct brain regions, leading to an integrated conscious perception, is assumed to be mediated by delta oscillations. In tinnitus, the distress associated with the condition arises as a consequence of coupling prefrontal areas, responsible for allocation of attentional resources with limbic (arousal) and temporal (auditory processing) regions. In neurofeedback, the downregulation of delta activity is hypothesized to lead to a de-coupling of the communication between the areas associated with the distress. No studies to date have tested the specific role of alpha and delta in the origin and perpetuation of tinnitus distress and intrusiveness. The present study seeks to compensate for this, by comparing an alpha and delta neurofeedback ratio training protocol with one assumed to have no direct association with the pathophysiology of tinnitus. In addition to the ten neurofeedback training sessions, all participants undergo diagnostic assessments at three time points throughout the trial (pre-neurofeedback training, post-neurofeedback training and at three months follow-up). For the first 40 participants, electroencephalographic (EEG) activity is recorded and cognitive capacity assessed with two attention tests, the Attention Network Test and Sustained Attention Response Task, respectively at all three time points. For the remaining 80 participants, the EEG recording is abandoned, and only cognitive capacity assessed in the pre- post, and follow-up phase of the study. EEG recording and attention processes is similarly measured in a control group (n=40) at the pre-neurofeedback training stage. The group is comprised of healthy, age and gender matched participants. Their inclusion serve the purpose of comparing the brain activity, both at rest and during cognitive activity between people with- and people without tinnitus.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
90
neurofeedback training protocol seeking to decrease the alpha/delta ratio, by simultaneous rewarding alpha and inhibiting delta activity.
neurofeedback training protocol seeking to decrease the beta/theta ratio, by simultaneous rewarding beta and inhibiting theta activity.
completion of diary relating to participants' experience of tinnitus intensity, interference, coping, harm and disability. Rated three times daily on numerical scale (0 - 10) for two weeks.
Philipps University Marburg, Dept. of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy
Marburg, Hesse, Germany
Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI; Newman, Sandridge, & Jacobson, 1998)
Self-report measure of tinnitus handicap assessed pre-intervention, mid-treatment (five sessions), post-intervention and at three month follow-up. The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory is a 25 item questionnaire. Each item is scored 0 - 4 (0 = No, 2 = Sometimes, 4 = Yes), yielding a total between 0 (no handicap) - 100 (catastrophic impact).
Time frame: 16 weeks
Tinnitus Magnitude Index (TMI; Schmidt, Kerns, Griest, Theodoroff, Pietrzak, & Henry, 2014).
TMI measures tinnitus intensity, three-item scale assessing self-reported severity, loudness and awareness. \- Visual analogue scale ranges from 0-10 or 0-100, respectively: item 1 (loudness): Range 0 (not at all strong or loud) to 10 (extremely strong or loud) item 2 (awareness): 0 to 100 in increments of 10, with verbal anchors of 0="never aware" and 100="always aware" item 3 (severity): 0-100 with verbal anchors of 0="no tinnitus present" to 100="the worst tinnitus you can imagine" * for all items higher values indicate higher tinnitus magnitude * values of the three items can be summed up to a total score. For standardisation, items are converted from 0-100 to 0-10.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI; Brüggemann, Szczepek, Kleinjung, Ojo, & Mazurek, 2017)
The Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) is a self-report measure of both perceived severity and negative impact of tinnitus. It covers multiple severity domains including but not exclusively quality of sleep, relaxation, sense of control. The TFI questionnaire consists of 25 items, predominantly scored between 0 - 10 bar item 1 and 3, which are expressed as percentages from 0 - 100%.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ; Broadbent, Petrie, Main, & Weinman, 2006)
The B-IPQ is a nine item self-report measure of individual cognitive and emotional representations of illness. It includes the following domains: consequences of the illness; perception of duration of illness; control over illness; treatment control; symptoms; understanding of illness; emotional response and causes.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI; Bastien, Vallières, & Morin, 2001)
A brief scanning measure of insomnia. It consists of 7 items assessing insomnia severity, interference in daily functioning, noticeability of impairment and distress/concern about sleep problems.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ; Devilly & Borkovec, 2000)
a quick and easy-to-administer scale for measuring treatment expectancy and rationale credibility for use in clinical outcome studies
Time frame: 4 weeks
Sustained Attention Response Task (SART; Robertson, Manly, Andrade, Baddeley, & Yiend, 1997)
measures the ability to sustain attention
Time frame: 16 weeks
Attention Network Test (ANT; Fan, McCandliss, Sommer, Raz, & Posner, 2002)
assesses orienting, alerting and executive attention processing respectively
Time frame: 16 weeks
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; Gräfe, Zipfel, Herzog, & Löwe, 2004)
Assessment of depressive symptoms
Time frame: 16 weeks