Mepolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, has been developed as an add-on treatment for subjects with severe asthma with eosinophilic inflammation. Current asthma treatment guidelines offer minimal options for the severe asthmatic subjects on intensive therapy with frequent exacerbations. There is a significant unmet medical need to provide better treatment options for this segment of the asthma population. Thus, this study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab in Chinese severe asthmatic subjects with eosinophilic inflammation. A total number of 300 subjects will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive either mepolizumab or placebo along with existing standard of care therapy. The maximum study duration will be 56 weeks.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
300
Mepolizumab will be given as a lyophilized cake in sterile vials for individual use. The vial will be reconstituted with Sterile Water for Injection, just prior to use.
Placebo will be given as 0.9 percent sodium chloride solution.
Salbutamol MDI will be given as a rescue medication to be used on an as needed basis in this study.
GSK Investigational Site
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
GSK Investigational Site
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
GSK Investigational Site
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
GSK Investigational Site
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
GSK Investigational Site
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
GSK Investigational Site
Rate of Clinically Significant Exacerbations of Asthma
Clinically significant exacerbation is defined as worsening of asthma which requires use of systemic corticosteroids and/or hospitalizations and/or Emergency Department (ED) visits. Analysis of the number of exacerbations was performed using a negative binomial model with covariates of treatment group, baseline maintenance Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) therapy (OCS vs. no OCS), region, exacerbations in the year prior to the study (as an ordinal variable) and baseline % predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1), and with logarithm of time on treatment as an offset variable.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percent Probability of First Clinically Significant Exacerbations at Week 16, Week 32, and Week 52
Clinically significant exacerbation is defined as worsening of asthma which requires use of systemic corticosteroids and/or hospitalizations and/or Emergency Department (ED) visits. Analysis of the number of exacerbations was performed using a negative binomial model with covariates of treatment group, baseline maintenance Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) therapy (OCS vs. no OCS), region, exacerbations in the year prior to the study (as an ordinal variable) and baseline % predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1), and with logarithm of time on treatment as an offset variable. Time to first clinically significant exacerbation was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and expressed in terms of probability.
Time frame: Week 16, 32 and 52
Mean Change From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) at Week 52
The SGRQ Questionnaire is a well-established, self-completed tool, with 50 questions comprising three domains: Symptoms, Activity, and Impacts scores (each ranging from 0 to 100; where higher score indicates worst outcome). SGRQ total score was calculated by summing weights from all positive items, divided by sum of weights for all items in SGRQ questionnaire and multiplying by 100. The SGRQ total score ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 implying the best possible health status and 100 implying worst possible health status. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures with covariates of baseline, baseline maintenance OCS therapy (OCS vs. no OCS), exacerbations in the year prior to the study (as an ordinal variable), baseline % predicted FEV1, treatment and visit, plus interaction terms for visit by baseline and visit by treatment group.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Exacerbations Requiring Hospitalization (Including Intubation and Admittance to an Intensive Care Unit [ICU]) or Emergency Department (ED) Visits
An exacerbation is defined as worsening of asthma requiring the use of systemic corticosteroids and/or emergency department visit, or hospitalization. The number of exacerbations requiring hospitalization including incubation and admittance to an Intensive care unit (ICU) or ED visits were evaluated. Analysis of number of exacerbations was performed using a negative binomial model with covariates of treatment group, baseline maintenance OCS therapy (OCS vs. no OCS), exacerbations in the year prior to the study (as an ordinal variable) and baseline % predicted FEV1, and with logarithm of time on treatment as an offset variable. The data for participants with 0, 1, 2 and 3 exacerbations requiring hospitalization (including intubation and admittance to an ICU) or ED visits are summarized.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Exacerbations Requiring Hospitalization
An exacerbation is defined as worsening of asthma requiring the use of systemic corticosteroids and/or emergency department visit, or hospitalization. Analysis of number of exacerbations was performed using a negative binomial model with covariates of treatment group, baseline maintenance OCS therapy (OCS vs. no OCS), exacerbations in the year prior to the study (as an ordinal variable) and baseline % predicted FEV1, and with logarithm of time on treatment as an offset variable. The summary data for participants with 0, 1, 2 and 3 exacerbations requiring hospitalization are summarized.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinic Prebronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 52
FEV1 is the volume of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. Prebronchodilator FEV1 were measured via spirometer at Baseline and Week 52. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures with covariates of baseline, baseline maintenance OCS therapy (OCS vs. no OCS), exacerbations in the year prior to the study (as an ordinal variable), treatment and visit, plus interaction terms for visit by baseline and visit by treatment group.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Including Systemic (i.e., Allergic [Type I Hypersensitivity] and Other Systemic) and Injection Site Reactions
AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Systemic reactions and local injection site reactions are adverse events of special interest (AESIs).
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Platelets Count
Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in hematology parameter Platelets count. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes Count
Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in hematology parameter Erythrocytes count. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit
Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in hematology parameter Hematocrit. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean White Blood Cell (WBC) Count With Differential (Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes. Eosinophils and Basophils)
Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in WBC) count with differential (neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes. eosinophils and basophils). Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase
Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in clinical parameter Alkaline Phosphatase. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase and Aspartate Aminotransferase
Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in clinical parameter Alanine Aminotransferase, Aspartate Aminotransferase. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Albumin and Total Protein
Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in clinical parameter albumin, total protein. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters
Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in clinical parameter including total and direct bilirubin, creatinine, glucose, calcium, sodium, potassium, urea. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP and DBP were measured in a sitting position after 5 minutes rest. The normal range for SBP is 90-140 mmHg and DBP is 60-90 millimeters of mercury (mmHg).
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Mean Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate
Pulse rate measurement were measured in a sitting position after 5 minutes rest.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
12-Lead electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements were obtained after the participants had rested in the supine position for 5 minutes. Clinically significant abnormal findings are based on the judgement of the investigator.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Mepolizumab Antibody
Blood samples were collected for detection of binding and neutralizing anti-mepolizumab antibodies. Samples with a positive screening result continued for confirmation analysis. Samples with a positive confirmation analysis were considered positive for mepolizumab Anti-drug antibody (ADA).
Time frame: Up to Week 52
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
GSK Investigational Site
Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China
GSK Investigational Site
Guiyang, Guizhou, China
GSK Investigational Site
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
GSK Investigational Site
Zhengzhou, Henan, China
...and 32 more locations