Local anesthesia is an integral part of clinical pediatric dental practice, but it has challenges. It can be uncomfortable for children, and the risk of adverse events limits how much is used. Some evidence suggests benefits of buffering local anesthetics including equal effect with less pain on injection. These findings have not been replicated and validated among pediatric populations, creating a gap in the knowledge base. To address this knowledge gap and contribute to the evidence base on safety and efficacy of local anesthesia in pediatric dentistry, this investigation proposes to compare the anesthetic effects of buffered 1% lidocaine with those of unbuffered 2%, among children. The specific aims of this investigation are to determine differences between buffered 1% and unbuffered 2% lidocaine (both with 1:100,000 epinephrine) used for inferior alveolar nerve block (IAN) anesthesia, in the following domains: 1. Pain experience on injection, time to onset following the administration, and time to recovery \[subjective\] 2. Blood lidocaine levels 15 minutes following the administration and duration of pulpal anesthesia \[objective\] Null Hypotheses: 1. No difference exists in anesthetic effectiveness for pulpal anesthesia after intraoral IAN block between buffered 1% Lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine as compared to unbuffered 2% Lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. 2. No differences exist in peak blood lidocaine levels, pain on injection, time to lip numbness, and duration of anesthesia between the two drug formulations. Randomized subjects will be injected orally for bottom jaw anesthesia, with 3cc of buffered 1% lidocaine (30mg) 1:100,000 epinephrine or 3cc unbuffered of 2% lidocaine (60mg) 1:100,000 epinephrine. The injectable volume of the buffered formulation will include 0.3cc of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. One faculty member in the Department of Pediatric Dentistry at the University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Dentistry will administer the drugs in the Pediatric Dentistry clinic. The same clinician will administer injection to the same subjects at both visits. Clinicians and subjects will not know which drug formulation is given at which appointment. A clinician will measure the level of discomfort on injection, how long it takes for the lip to be numb, how long it takes for the first molar tooth in that area to be numb, how long it takes the local anesthetic to wear off, and how much of the anesthetic is in the blood.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
26
A single IAN block with 3cc 1% Buffered Lidocaine (30mg) 1:100,000 Epinephrine using the Halstead technique.
A single IAN block with 3cc 2% Unbuffered Lidocaine (60mg) 1:100,000 Epinephrine using the Halstead technique.
UNC School of Dentistry
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Mean Pain Scores Following Injection
Perceived pain on injection, self-reported verbally using a Likert scale from 1-10, with lower numbers corresponding to less pain (1 = "no pain," 10 = "worst pain imaginable"). Lower scores reflect a lesser degree of pain.
Time frame: Within 10 minutes of injection
Mean Time to Lower Lip Numbness Following Injection
Time in minutes beginning immediately following injection to patient-reported lip numbness
Time frame: Up to 30 minutes following injection
Average Serum Lidocaine Concentration at 15 Minutes Post Injection
Blood Lidocaine Level (mcg/mL) as measured in 10cc venous blood, taken 15 minutes following injection. Blood assayed for serum lidocaine levels with a Sciex TripleTOF liquid chromatography- mass spectrometry (LC-MS) equipped with a C18 Hypersil (10mm x 2.1mm, 3.0μm).
Time frame: One blood draw taken 15 minutes following injection
Mean Time to Baseline Lip Sensation
Response in minutes from injection to when lip is no longer numb, as self reported by patient.
Time frame: Within 24 hours following injection
Number of Participants Who Respond to Cold Stimulus (Positive/Negative) Prior to Injection
Response to experiencing sensation to cold stimulus on permanent molar tooth prior to injection
Time frame: 5 minutes prior to injection
Number of Participants Who Respond to Cold Stimulus (Positive/Negative) 30 Minutes Following Injection
Response to experiencing sensation to cold stimulus on permanent molar tooth 30 minutes following injection
Time frame: 30 minutes following injection
Number of Participants Who Respond to Cold Stimulus (Positive/Negative) 60 Minutes Following Injection
Response to experiencing sensation to cold stimulus on permanent molar tooth 60 minutes following injection
Time frame: 60 minutes following injection
Number of Participants Who Respond to Cold Stimulus (Positive/Negative) 90 Minutes Following Injection
Response to experiencing sensation to cold stimulus on permanent molar tooth 90 minutes following injection
Time frame: 90 minutes following injection
Number of Participants Who Respond to Cold Stimulus (Positive/Negative) 120 Minutes Following Injection
Response to experiencing sensation to cold stimulus on permanent molar tooth 120 minutes following injection
Time frame: 120 minutes following injection
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.