Rationale: The appearance of tastants in the small intestine following food ingestion results in the onset of digestion and absorption but can also result in the activation of a negative feedback mechanism from different parts of the intestine to the stomach, the small intestine and to the central nervous system. These processes inhibit food processing, appetite sensations and food intake, and furthermore they increase feelings of satiety and satiation. In this study, we aim to investigate the effects of oral sham feeding and intragastric delivery of a bitter tastant (quinine) on ad libitum food intake, satiation, gastrointestinal symptoms, and heart rate variability. Objective: To investigate the effect of oral sham feeding and intragastric delivery of a bitter tastant on food intake. Secondary Objective(s): 1. To compare the effect of oral sham feeding and intragastric delivery of a bitter tastant on satiation. 2. To assess the effect of oral sham feeding and intragastric delivery of a bitter tastant on gastrointestinal symptoms/complaints. 3. To assess the effect of oral sham feeding and intragastric delivery of a bitter tastant on heart rate variability.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
42
Oral sham feeding with quinine
A gastric capsule containing quinine
Oral sham feeding with placebo (tap water)
A gastric capsule containing placebo (cellulose)
Maastricht University
Venlo, Limburg, Netherlands
Ad libitum food intake
Difference in ad libitum meal intake (as measured during ad libitum pasta meal)
Time frame: on each test day at T= 50, 50 minutes after ingestion of the capsule and sham-feeding
Satiation/satiety
Difference in satiation/satiety (as measured by VAS 0-100mm). VAS scores for satiety feelings (e.g., satiety, fullness, hunger, prospective feeding, desire to eat, desire to snack) will be measured using Visual Analogue Scales (VAS, 0 to 100 mm) anchored at the low end with the most negative or lowest intensity feelings (e.g., extremely unpleasant, not at all), and with opposing terms at the high end (e.g., extremely pleasant, very high, extreme). Volunteers will be asked to indicate on a line which place on the scale best reflects their feeling at that moment. The scoring forms will be collected immediately so that they cannot be used as a reference for later scorings.
Time frame: At T= -20 mins, T= -10 mins, T=0 mins, T= 10 mins, T= 20 mins, T= 30 mins, T= 40 mins, T=50 and T= end, where T= 0 is ingestion of capsule and sham-feeding and T= end is whenever the participant finishes the test meal given at T= 50 mins.
GI-symptoms
Difference in gastro-intestinal symptoms (as measured by VAS 0-100mm). VAS scores for gastrointestinal symptoms (burning, bloating, belching, cramps, colics, warm sensation, sensation of abdominal fullness, nausea, pain and relaxation/tensness) will be measured using Visual Analogue Scales (VAS, 0 to 100 mm) anchored at the low end with the most negative or lowest intensity feelings (e.g., extremely unpleasant, not at all), and with opposing terms at the high end (e.g., extremely pleasant, very high, extreme). Volunteers will be asked to indicate on a line which place on the scale best reflects their feeling at that moment. The scoring forms will be collected immediately so that they cannot be used as a reference for later scorings.
Time frame: At T= -20 mins, T= -10 mins, T=0 mins, T= 10 mins, T= 20 mins, T= 30 mins, T= 40 mins, T=50 and T= end, where T= 0 is ingestion of capsule and sham-feeding and T= end is whenever the participant finishes the test meal given at T= 50 mins.
Heart rate variability
Difference in heartrate variability
Time frame: At T= -150 mins, T= -15 mins, T= 5 mins, and T= 35 mins, where T= -150 is 150 minutes before ingestion of standardized breakfast meal, T= 0 mins is ingestion of capsule and sham-feeding.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.