Specific Aims for this Project Are: 1. To evaluate the ability of two forms of mindfulness training, relative to a control intervention, to engage specific "triple-vulnerability" mechanistic targets that characterize low SES smokers. 1. The investigators hypothesize that both versions of the mindfulness training will show greater target engagement than the control treatment for mechanistic targets assessed under standard smoking conditions. 2. The investigators hypothesize that the enhanced mindfulness training, Mindfulness+IE, will show greater target engagement than the other two conditions for mechanistic targets assessed during the nicotine deprivation window. 2. To show that the hypothesized differential target engagement results in differential smoking self-control as evaluated by greater time to lapse, fewer cigarettes smoked, and different smoking topography in the McKee Lapse protocol. 3. To expand and refine the list of SOBC targets by showing the specific relationship between currently identified assays and empirically-validated alternative targets, with attention to showing which of the targeted mechanisms in which contexts are most linked to clinically-relevant outcomes assessed in the McKee protocol, and which offer redundant or non-significant prediction.
This study is designed to evaluate the success of mechanistic target engagement in two specific contexts: under standard smoking conditions and under nicotine deprivation (stress) conditions. After screening, consent, and baseline assessment, participants selected on the basis of inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized to one of three intervention conditions: (1) a health-education control condition (CC), (2) a mindfulness training condition (MT), or (3) a mindfulness training condition combined with training applying mindfulness skills in the context of interoceptive exposure (Mindfulness+IE). Following 6 sessions of these interventions, delivered over 3 weeks, participants will then undergo the standard smoking assessment of mechanistic targets. Two days later (and matching the progression to quit-attempt challenges following treatment), participants will undergo the deprivation window assessment (14 hours of smoking abstinence) of these same mechanistic targets, followed by evaluation of lapse behavior and smoking topography in the McKee paradigm to yield: (1) latency to initiate smoking during a monetarily reinforced delay period, (2) the number of cigarettes smoked during a subsequent 60-minute self-administration period, and (3) exploratory analysis of smoking topography: puff volume, puff duration, and inter-puff interval. Participants will be recruited to Boston University through study advertisements targeted to low SES neighborhoods, with attention to health service centers and religious institutions serving low SES individuals. Following telephone screening for basic eligibility, participants will be scheduled for an informed consent interview and subsequent baseline assessment session. Interventions are to be completed over the subsequent 3 weeks, and post-treatment assessments of the mechanistic targets are scheduled for one-week (standard smoking assessment) and one week + 2 days (deprivation-window assessment) from the last intervention session. For the standard smoking window assessments, participants are asked to smoke .5 hour before the scheduled assessment session. The deprivation-window assessment is scheduled two days later, (for example, scheduled for 12:00 noon, with smoking to cease at 10PM the night before). Upon arrival to the lab, nicotine abstinence will be verified by expired CO levels, as determined by a cut-off of half of the participant's screening session CO concentration or \<10 PPM (those failing will be rescheduled). After verification of abstinence, participants will complete assessment of the triple-risk mechanistic target variables. These assessments will be followed by the McKee Lapse protocol: participants will be instructed that over the next 50 min, they will have the option to initiate a cigarette self-administration (smoking) session at any point or to delay initiation in exchange for monetary reinforcement. If participants choose to delay, they will be awarded funds for each 5-minute increment they are able to resist smoking. Once participants choose to end the delay period in order to smoke (or resist smoking for the entire 50 minute delay period), they will then participate in a 60-minute cigarette self-administration session, in which they will be given the choice to either smoke their preferred brand of cigarettes or receive monetary reinforcement for cigarettes not smoked. Participants will be given funds at the beginning of the self-administration session and will lose a portion of the funds for each cigarette smoked. When participants smoke in this protocol, we will use the Clinical Research Support System (CReSS) to measure smoking topography. The reliability and acceptability of use of the portable CReSS device is well documented,88,94 and is recommended over direct observation. Topography data will include puff CO volume, puff duration, and inter-puff interval. Puff level data will be averaged to compute mean topography variables for each participant.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
As per arm of the same name
As per arm of the same name
As per arm of the same name
Boston University
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Negative Affect
PANAS-State Negative was used to assess the mechanistic outcome of Negative Affectivity/Stress. Items from the negative subscale are summed to create a total score. Scores can range from 10-50, with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect.
Time frame: 1-week Post-Intervention Smoking Context
Negative Affect/Withdrawal
Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale (WSWS) was used to assess withdrawal symptoms. Some items are reversed scored and the average of all items is calculated. Scores range between 0 and 4, with higher scores indicating stronger withdrawal symptoms.
Time frame: 1-week Post-Intervention Smoking Context
N-Back Task
Adaptive N-Back task is a continuous performance task that was administered on the computer. It was used to assess working memory capacity. The participant is present with a series of stimuli and asked to identify when the current stimulus matches the one from n back steps prior. For the current task, n was equal to 2. As such, the score reported is the total number of correct trials form the 2-back condition of the computer task. Higher scores indicate better working memory capacity. Participant completed 20 trials. The task was administered online and can be found at: https://measures.scienceofbehaviorchange.org/measuredetails/d4a117c9-e5d8-41a0-8227-ac570a60f89f.
Time frame: 1-week Post-Intervention Smoking Context
Spatial Span
The mechanistic outcome of working memory was assessed by summing the number of correct trials on the backwards spatial span task. The spatial span task was administered via computer. On each trial, participants see an array of geometric shapes (white squares) on the screen. The squares change from white to a different color in a sequence with variable orders and colors. At the end of the list sequences, the participants attempt to recall the squares in the reverse order that they changed color. The difficulty on each trial is increased by varying the number of boxes from two (easiest) to nine (hardest). The maximum number of boxes correctly recalled is the outcome measure. Higher numbers of boxes recalled indicates increased working memory capacity. The task was administered online from the SOBC Repository and is available at: https://scienceofbehaviorchange.org/measures/spatial-span-task/.
Time frame: 1-week Post-Intervention Smoking Context
Digit Span
The mechanistic outcome of working memory was assessed by taking the longest span of correct answers on the backwards digit span task. The digit span task was administered via computer. On each trial, participants are presented with lists of digits 1 at a time on the screen. At the end of each list, participants attempt to recall the digits in reverse ordered they appeared by typing them in. After each successfully completed trial, the number of digits in the list is increased by 1 for the next trial. After a failed trial, the number of digits remains the same for the next trial. The task ends when the participant makes errors for two trails in a row for a given digit span. The maximum number of digits correctly recalled is the outcome measure. Higher numbers (more digits) indicated increased working memory capacity. The task was administered online from the SOBC Repository and is available at: https://scienceofbehaviorchange.org/measures/digit-span-task/.
Time frame: 1-week Post-Intervention Smoking Context
Anxiety Sensitivity
The mechanistic outcome of distress tolerance was assessed with the Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI 3). Items on this scale are summed, with scores ranging from 0-72. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Time frame: 1-week Post-Intervention Smoking Context
Mirror-Tracing Persistence Task
The mechanistic outcome of behavioral distress tolerance was assessed with the mirror-tracing persistence task. The task measures how long the participant persists in completing the tracing tasks. Longer times are indicative of better behavioral stress tolerance capacity.
Time frame: 1-week Post-Intervention Smoking Context
Negative Affect
PANAS-State Negative was used to assess the mechanistic outcome of Negative Affectivity/Stress. Items from the negative subscale are summed to create a total score. Scores can range from 10-50, with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect.
Time frame: 1week+2days Post-Intervention Deprivation Context
Negative Affect/Withdrawal
Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale (WSWS) was used to assess withdrawal symptoms. Some items are reversed scored and the average of all items is calculated. Scores range between 0 and 4, with higher scores indicating stronger withdrawal symptoms.
Time frame: 1week+2days Post-Intervention Deprivation Context
N-Back Task
Adaptive N-Back task is a continuous performance task that was administered on the computer. It was used to assess working memory capacity. The participant is present with a series of stimuli and asked to identify when the current stimulus matches the one from n back steps prior. For the current task, n was equal to 2. As such, the score reported is the total number of correct trials form the 2-back condition of the computer task. Higher scores indicate better working memory capacity. Participant completed 20 trials. The task was administered online and can be found at: https://measures.scienceofbehaviorchange.org/measuredetails/d4a117c9-e5d8-41a0-8227-ac570a60f89f.
Time frame: 1week+2days Post-Intervention Deprivation Contex
Spatial Span
The mechanistic outcome of working memory was assessed by summing the number of correct trials on the backwards spatial span task. The spatial span task was administered via computer. On each trial, participants see an array of geometric shapes (white squares) on the screen. The squares change from white to a different color in a sequence with variable orders and colors. At the end of the list sequences, the participants attempt to recall the squares in the reverse order that they changed color. The difficulty on each trial is increased by varying the number of boxes from two (easiest) to nine (hardest). The maximum number of boxes correctly recalled is the outcome measure. Higher numbers of boxes recalled indicates increased working memory capacity. The task was administered online from the SOBC Repository and is available at: https://scienceofbehaviorchange.org/measures/spatial-span-task/.
Time frame: 1week+2days Post-Intervention Deprivation Contex
Digit Span
The mechanistic outcome of working memory was assessed by taking the longest span of correct answers on the backwards digit span task. The digit span task was administered via computer. On each trial, participants are presented with lists of digits 1 at a time on the screen. At the end of each list, participants attempt to recall the digits in reverse ordered they appeared by typing them in. After each successfully completed trial, the number of digits in the list is increased by 1 for the next trial. After a failed trial, the number of digits remains the same for the next trial. The task ends when the participant makes errors for two trails in a row for a given digit span. The maximum number of digits correctly recalled is the outcome measure. Higher numbers (more digits) indicated increased working memory capacity. The task was administered online from the SOBC Repository and is available at: https://scienceofbehaviorchange.org/measures/digit-span-task/.
Time frame: 1week+2days Post-Intervention Deprivation Context
Anxiety Sensitivity
The mechanistic outcome of distress tolerance was assessed with the Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI 3). Items on this scale are summed, with scores ranging from 0-72. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Time frame: 1week+2days Post-Intervention Deprivation Contex
Mirror-Tracing Persistence Task
The mechanistic outcome of behavioral distress tolerance was assessed with the mirror-tracing persistence task. The task measures how long the participant persists in completing the tracing tasks. Longer times are indicative of better behavioral stress tolerance capacity.
Time frame: 1week+2days Post-Intervention Deprivation Context
McKee Protocol Delay Until Smoking
Degree of delay (in minutes) until smoking in the McKee protocol. The number of minutes the participant went during the delay period without smoking is reported. If the participant did not smoke at all during the delay period, the value is 50.
Time frame: 1week+2days Post-Intervention Deprivation Context
McKee Protocol Number of Cigarettes Smoked
Number of cigarettes smoked in the 60 minute self-administration session. No value is entered if the participant did not smoke a cigarette during the session at all. Otherwise, the number reported is the number of cigarettes the participant smoked during the session.
Time frame: 1week+2days Post-Intervention Deprivation Context
Smoking Topography-1
Puff CO volume. During administration of this assessment, there was equipment failure. For this reason, no participants had valid data collected or analyzed for this measure.
Time frame: 1week+2days Post-Intervention Deprivation Context
Smoking Topography-2
Puff CO volume. During administration of this assessment, there was equipment failure. For this reason, no participants had valid data collected or analyzed for this measure.
Time frame: 1week+2days Post-Intervention Deprivation Context
Smoking Topography-3
Inter-puff interval. During administration of this assessment, there was equipment failure. For this reason, no participants had valid data collected or analyzed for this measure.
Time frame: 1week+2days Post-Intervention Deprivation Context
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.