Current guidelines in non-small cell lung cancer recommend genomic assessment for mutations in EGFR and BRAF, gene rearrangements in ALK and ROS1, and resistance mutations such as T790M upon progression during EGFR inhibitor therapy. However, obtaining sufficient tumour tissue to test for these molecular alterations, as well as those with emerging targeted therapies, is challenging in lung cancer. A promising method to improve molecular diagnostic testing in lung and other cancers is the use of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) obtained from blood samples or liquid biopsies. This multi-centre prospective study will compare blood-based profiling (using the GUARDANT360 assay) to standard of care tissue-based profiling within the Canadian system.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
207
GUARDANT360 is a validated cfDNA next-generation sequencing assay that identifies variants in 73 genes associated with several cancers.
Tom Baker Cancer Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
BC Cancer Agency
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Juravinski Cancer Centre
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Ottawa Hospital Regional Cancer Centre
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Response rate to first-line therapy
Measure best response to first-line therapy using investigator-assessed RECIST 1.1, including progression free survival and time to treatment failure, in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma using the cfDNA GUARDANT360 assay versus standard of care tissue genotyping.
Time frame: Up to 18 Months
Proportion of patients receiving targeted therapy
Compare the proportion of patients receiving targeted therapy using the cfDNA GUARDANT360 assay versus standard of care tissue genotyping.
Time frame: Up to 18 Months
Time to Treatment Initiation
The time to treatment initiation using both genotyping methods, will be calculated as the number of days from the date of pathologic or clinical stage IV NSCLC diagnosis until initiation of systemic treatment. This will be compared to the turnaround time for GUARDANT360 results.
Time frame: Up to 18 Months
Incremental number of actionable genomic alterations
Count the number of actionable genomic alterations identified in cfDNA that were not identified in tumour tissue standard of care testing.
Time frame: Up to 18 Months
Turnaround time of cfDNA vs. tissue results
Calculate the time (in days) from the date of request for testing to the report date for both genotyping methods.
Time frame: Up to 18 Months
Costs of cfDNA vs. tissue testing
Cost consequence analysis to examine incremental mean direct and indirect costs in Canadian dollars between the two approaches (cfDNA testing vs tumour tissue genotyping).
Time frame: Up to 18 Months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.