Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease. Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is a relentlessly progressing rare neurodegenerative disease of unknown etiology. In early stages of the disease, PD and MSA symptoms are very similar, particularly MSA-P where Parkinsonism predominates. The differential diagnosis between MSA-P and PD can be very challenging in early disease stages, while early diagnostic certitude is important for the patient because of the diverging prognosis. Voice disorders are a common early symptom in both diseases and of different origin. The ambition and the originality of this project are to develop a digital voice-based tool for objective discrimination between PD and MSA-P.
Given the clinical similarity between PD and MSA-P in early disease stages and the severity of the prognosis of MSA-P, it would be very useful to have objective tools to assist in the differential diagnosis between both disorders. Since dysarthria is a common early symptom in both diseases and of different origin, the innovative goal of this project is to use dysarthria, through a digital processing of voice recordings of patients, as a vehicle to distinguish between PD and MSA-P in early disease stages. The team will build a corpus of voice samples of patients with both diseases and a recent diagnosis (less than 4 years) and controls. This corpus will consist in sustained vowels, utterances of a standard text and spontaneous speech. The recordings will be performed using a high quality digital recorder (H4n) and the DIANA and EVA-2 workstations. DIANA is a state-of-the-art system dedicated to pathological voice recording and analysis. An electroglottograph (EGG), a non-invasive device, will be also used in conjunction with the recordings to provide the ground truth of glottal opening and closure instants during utterances. The use of an EGG can be very useful given that OGI and GCI provide valuable information about the voice short-time dynamics.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
68
A digital processing of voice recordings (from 30 to 45 minutes) will be performed for each participant, using a high quality digital recorder: the DIANA (computerized device of acoustic analysis) and the EVA-2 workstations (assisted Evaluation system Voice).
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse
Toulouse, France
Differences between groups in Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI).
DSI will be calculated with the SESANE software (http://www.sqlab.fr/) and with algorithms developed by GeoStat at Inria. Evaluation of the rhythm voice 1. Vowels: mean frequency (Hz), variation coefficient (%), jitter factor (%), mean intensity (dB), shimmer factor (%), and noise to harmony ratio (dB). 2. Speech prosody: mean frequency (Hz), variation coefficient (%), minimal frequency (Hz), maximal frequency (Hz), dynamic (Hz), mean duration of speech between two pauses (seconds), total amount of syllables (syllables/s), total amount of pure speech (syllables/s), articulation rate (syllables/s), percentage of pauses (%), percentage of pauses within words (%), time between pauses (s), SPIR index of rhythmicity (words/min), fragmentation of vowels (%), voice onset time (s), stop-consonant spirantization (%). Aerodynamic voice parameters will be assessed with the DIANA system (http://www.sqlab.fr/) and algorithms specifically developed by GeoStat at Inria.
Time frame: Day 1
Differences between groups in Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI)
AVQI will be calculated with the SESANE software (http://www.sqlab.fr/) and with algorithms developed by GeoStat at Inria. Objective measurement of overall voice quality consisted of determining the acoustic parameters for calculating AVQI: smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPs) with the computer program "SpeechTool" (James Hillenbrand, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) and harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR), shimmer local, shimmer local dB, general slope of the spectrum (slope) and tilt of the regression line through the spectrum (tilt) with Praat. Te Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) was calculated according to the regression formula: 2.571 \[3.295 - 0.111 (CPPs) - 0.073 (HNR) - 0.213 (shimmer local) + 2.789 (shimmer local dB) - 0.032 (slope) + 0.077 (tilt)\].
Time frame: Day 1
Differences between groups in oral airflow (dm3/s).
This parameter will be evaluated with the EVA2 system (http://www.sqlab.fr/).
Time frame: Day 1
Differences between groups in glottal leakage (cc/s/dB)
This parameter will be evaluated with the EVA2 system (http://www.sqlab.fr/).
Time frame: Day 1
Differences between groups in intra-oral pressure (hPa).
This parameter will be evaluated with the EVA2 system (http://www.sqlab.fr/).
Time frame: Day 1
Differences between groups in perceptive analysis of dysphonia based on total GRBAS-I scale scores (range 0-18)
The GRBAS-I scale evaluates six items, i.e. G (Grade), R (Roughness), B (Breathiness), A (Asthenicity), S (Strained) and I (Instability)
Time frame: Day 1
Differences between groups in perceptive analysis of dysarthria based on French Clinical Dysarthria Battery scores
Sum of all 12 prosody item scores and all 6 phonetic performance item scores; range 0-84.
Time frame: Day 1
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.