Cognitive impairment is present in about 30-50% of the patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Suitable screening tools are available, but none of these are evaluated in a Norwegian population.
Screening of cognitive and behavioral impairment is a distinct recommendation in ALS-specific health-care. Thus, a rapid screening tool valid for use in Norway is urgent. However, cognitive assessment for patients with ALS can be difficult due to the complexity of cognitive impairment, as well as motor challenges with writing, drawing and speaking. Therefore, only ALS-specific, multi domain screening instruments with integrated behavioral sections should be used. Internationally, the Edinburgh cognitive and behavioral amyotrophic lateral sclerosis screen (ECAS), is recommended for the purpose. Besides being quick and easy to administer, the ECAS is shown to be sensitive and have high specificity to ALS-specific dysfunction and behavioral changes. The introduction of ECAS has probably contributed to a more nuanced picture of cognitive impairment in ALS than previously assumed. Therefore the ECAS has been translated and culturally adapted into Norwegian (ECAS-N). Based on scores from healthy people, Norwegian age- and educational-adjusted norms for verbal fluency (n=277) and cut-off-scores (n=85) for abnormal findings are established. However, further investigation of psychometric properties of the ECAS-N is needed. The objectives of the study are: 1. To investigate if the ECAS-N reflect cognitive impairment (internal consistency), and is robust to measurement errors due to different times of testing (test-retest reliability) and different raters (interrater reliability) 2. To investigate if the ECAS-N can be used to distinguish between people with ALS-specific cognitive impairment, and those who do not have cognitive impairment, and those who have cognitive impairment due to other disorders (construct validity).
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
31
Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen, Norway
Edinburgh cognitive and behavioural amyotrophic lateral sclerosis screen - Norwegian Version (ECAS-N)
We will use the ALS-specific sub-score (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 100), the ALS non-specific sub-score (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 36), a summed total ECAS-N score (minimum score =0, maximum score =136), the sub score of behavioural changes (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 10) and the sub score of psychotic change (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 3). A dichotomized cut-off scores for normality will also be used for the ALS-specific cut-off score of 65 or over, the non ALS-specific cut-off score of 24 or over and the total ECAS-N cut-off score of 92 or over. For the ALS-specific scores, non ALS-specific scores and total ECAS-N scores, high scores indicate less problems than low scores. For the sub score of behavioural change and the sub score of psychotic change, high scores indicate more problems than low scores.
Time frame: 4 months
Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) - Norwegian version
We will use the total MoCA score (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 30) and a dichotomized cut-off score for normality of 26 or over. High scores indicate less problems than low scores
Time frame: 4 months
Change from 4 months Edinburgh cognitive and behavioural amyotrophic lateral sclerosis screen - Norwegian Version (ECAS-N) at 8 months
We will use the changed ALS-specific sub-score (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 100), the changed ALS non-specific sub-score (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 36), a changed summed total ECAS-N score (minimum score =0, maximum score =136), the changed sub score of behavioural changes (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 10) and the changed sub score of psychotic change (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 3). A changed dichotomized cut-off scores for normality will also be used for the ALS-specific cut-off score of 65 or over, the non ALS-specific cut-off score of 24 or over and the total ECAS-N cut-off score of 92 or over. For the ALS-specific scores, non ALS-specific scores and total ECAS-N scores, high scores indicate less problems than low scores. For the sub score of behavioural change and the sub score of psychotic change, high scores indicate more problems than low scores.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 8 months