Phase 3 study to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of aztreonam- avibactam (ATM- AVI) versus best available therapy (BAT) in the treatment of hospitalized adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), nosocomial pneumonia (NP) including hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), or bloodstream infections (BSI) due to metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)- producing Gram-negative bacteria.
This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, parallel group, comparative study to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of aztreonam- avibactam (ATM- AVI) versus best available therapy (BAT) in the treatment of hospitalized adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), nosocomial pneumonia (NP) including hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), or bloodstream infections (BSI) due to metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)- producing Gram-negative bacteria. The study will randomize approximately 60 subjects in a 2:1 randomization scheme (ATM-AVI: BAT) with infections due to MBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria. Molecular testing at the central microbiology laboratory will be performed to confirm the MBL status of the organism upon study completion or at pre-designated intervals. The study will consist of a Screening Visit (Visit 1), a Baseline visit (Visit 2) on Day 1 of the study treatment, ongoing treatment visits (Visits 3 to 15) from Day 2 to Day 14, an End of Treatment (EOT) visit (Visit 16) within 24 hours after the last infusion, a Test of Cure (TOC) visit (Visit 17) on Day 28 (±3 days) and a Late Follow Up (LFU) visit (Visit 18) on Day 45 (±3 days). Subjects will be stratified at randomization based on infection type (cIAI, HAP/VAP, cUTI or BSI). The number of subjects with cUTI will be no more than approximately 75% of the study population. After obtaining written informed consent and confirming eligibility, subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to the ATM AVI treatment arm or the BAT treatment arm according to a central randomization schedule (approximately 40 (ATM AVI) and approximately 20 (BAT) subjects per group). The duration of treatment is 5 to 14 days for cIAI, cUTI and BSI and 7 to 14 days for HAP/VAP. Each subject is expected to complete the study, including the LFU visit. The precise duration of treatment will be determined by the investigator based on the subject's severity of infection and subsequent response to treatment. For subjects randomized to ATM AVI treatment arm, sparse blood samples will be collected for population pharmacokinetic (PK) assessments and PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) relationships will be evaluated in subjects where plasma samples and microbiological response data have been collected.
ATM-AVI doses (loading, extended loading and maintenance) and the dosing frequency of the maintenance dose are dependent on renal function. Subjects will be given a loading dose of 500 mg ATM plus 167 mg AVI or 675 mg ATM plus 225 mg AVI over a period of 30 minutes. This treatment will immediately be followed by an extended loading dose of 1500 mg ATM plus 500 mg AVI or 675 mg ATM plus 225 mg AVI over a period of 3 hours. Then there will be a 3 hour or 5 hour gap. Subjects will receive a maintenance dose of 1500 mg ATM plus 500 mg AVI every 6 hours or 750 mg ATM plus 250 mg AVI every 6 hours, or 675 mg ATM plus 225 mg AVI every 8 hours. Subjects with cIAI will also receive Metronidazole (MTZ) 500 mg IV q8h over 60 minutes. The first dose of MTZ will be started immediately after the extended loading dose of ATM-AVI has completed and treatment will be continued until the end of the treatment period.
The comparator treatment in this study is best available therapy (BAT) based upon site practice and local epidemiology. The choice of BAT (monotherapy or combination) for each subject must be recorded prior to randomization. If the chosen BAT does not provide adequate anaerobic coverage for cIAI subjects MTZ is to be administered as a co therapy. BAT dose, frequency, dose adjustments with renal impairment will be based on per local package inserts.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit -Microbiological Intent to Treat (Micro-ITT) Analysis Set
Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response assessment was determined by a blinded independent adjudication committee. 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Time frame: Day 28
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the TOC Visit-Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set
Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response assessment was determined by a blinded independent adjudication committee. 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Time frame: Day 28
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit- Micro-ITT Analysis Set
Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response assessment was determined by a blinded independent adjudication committee. 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Time frame: Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the EOT Visit- ME Analysis Set
Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response assessment was determined by a blinded independent adjudication committee. 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
15
Banner University Medical Center Tucson
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Hospital San Roque
Córdoba, Argentina
The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College
Shantou, Guangdong, China
Hunan Province People's Hospital
Changsha, Hunan, China
Baotou Central Hospital
Baotou, Inner Mongolia, China
Huashan Hospital Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
The First Hospital of Kunming
Kunming, Yunnan, China
The First Hospital of Kunming
Kunming, China
General Hospital of Athens "Evangelismos"
Athens, Greece
General and Chest Diseases Hospital "Sotiria"
Athens, Greece
...and 32 more locations
Time frame: Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14
Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 colony forming units per milliliter \[CFU/mL\] for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants).
Time frame: Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14
Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 colony forming units per milliliter \[CFU/mL\] for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants).
Time frame: Day 28
Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit-ME Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants).
Time frame: Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14
Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit-ME Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants).
Time frame: Day 28
Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants).
Time frame: Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14
Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the TOC Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants).
Time frame: Day 28
Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit-ME Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). ME analysis set comprised of participants from micro-ITT who received at least 48 hours or \<48 hours of study therapy before discontinuation due to AE, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline MBL positive pathogens between 1st dose and TOC (excluding those with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms confirmed by central microbiological testing (except when locally confirmed); no indeterminate clinical outcomes at TOC.
Time frame: Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14
Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the TOC Visit-ME Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). ME analysis set comprised of participants from micro-ITT who received at least 48 hours or \<48 hours of study therapy before discontinuation due to AE, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline MBL positive pathogens between 1st dose and TOC (excluding those with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms confirmed by central microbiological testing (except when locally confirmed); no indeterminate clinical outcomes at TOC.
Time frame: Day 28
Percentage of Participants Who Died Within 28 Days From Randomization-ITT Analysis Set
Percentage of participants who died due to any cause on or before 28 days after randomization were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From randomization up to Day 28
Percentage of Participants Who Died Within 28 Days From Randomization- Micro ITT Analysis Set
Percentage of participants who died due to any cause on or before 28 days after randomization were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From randomization up to Day 28
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death; was life-threatening (immediate risk of death); required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/ incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect; considered an important medical event. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was any AE that started after the study medication start date and time.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until late follow-up visit (Up to Day 45)
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities
Vital signs included blood pressure and heart rate and were measured in a supine position after at least 10 minutes of rest for the participants. Criteria for vital sign abnormalities included: systolic blood pressure (SBP): value \>150 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and increase from baseline \>=30 mmHg and value \<90 and decrease from baseline ≥30. Diastolic BP (mm Hg) Value \>100 and increase from baseline \>= 20 and Value \<50 and decrease from baseline \>=20. Heart Rate (beats per minute \[BPM\]): Value \<40 or \>120.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 28)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings
Physical examination included assessment of the following: abdomen, cardiovascular, ears, eyes, general appearance, head, lungs, lymph nodes, musculoskeletal, neurological, nose, skin and throat. Number of participants with abnormal physical examination findings for each body system is reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Baseline (last non-missing value observed before start of treatment on Day 1), EOT (Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14), TOC (Day 28)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments
Potential clinically significant criteria included: Hematocrit \<0.7\*lower limit of normal (LLN) and \>30% Decrease from Baseline or \>1.3\*upper limit of normal (ULN) and \>30% Increase from Baseline; Hemoglobin: \<0.7\*LLN and \>30% Decrease from Baseline and\>1.3\*ULN and \>30% Increase from Baseline;;Erythrocytes: \<0.7\*LLN and \>30% Decrease from Baseline or \>1.3\*ULN and \>30% Increase from Baseline; Leukocytes: \<0.65\*LLN and \>60% Decrease from Baseline or \>1.5\*ULN and \>100% Increase from Baseline; Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes and Monocytes/Leukocytes: \>4.0\*ULN and\>300% Increase from Baseline; Lymphocytes/Leukocytes \<0.25\*LLN and \>75% Decrease from Baseline and \>1.5\* ULN and \>100% Increase from Baseline; Neutrophils/Leukocytes: \<0.65\*LLN and \>75% Decrease from Baseline or \>1.6\*ULN and \>100% Increase from Baseline; Platelets\<0.65\*LLN and \>50% Decrease from Baseline or \>1.5\*ULN and \>100% Increase from Baseline.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 28)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments
Criteria for potential clinically significant results were: Aspartate Aminotransferase and Alanine Aminotransferase: \>3.0\* ULN and \>100% increase from baseline (IFB); Bilirubin: \>1.5\* ULN and \>100% IFB; Direct Bilirubin: \>2.0\* ULN and \>150% IFB; Alkaline Phosphatase: 80% decrease from baseline (DFB) and \>3.0\* ULN and \>100% IFB; Urea Nitrogen:100% DFB and \>3.0\* ULN and \>200% IFB; Creatinine \>2.0\* ULN and \>100% IFB; Sodium :10% DFB or \>1.1\* ULN and \>10% IFB; Potassium: 20% DFB or \>1.2\* ULN and \>20% IFB; Chloride: 20% DFB or \>1.2\*ULN and \>20% IFB; Bicarbonate: 40% DFB or \>1.3\* ULN and \>40% IFB; Calcium: 30% DFB or \>1.3\* ULN and \>30% IFB; Albumin: 50% DFB or \>1.5\* ULN and \>50% IFB; Glucose: 40% DFB or \>3.0\*ULN and \>200% IFB.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 28)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG)
A standard 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a supine position after at least 10 minutes of rest. The following ECG parameters were recorded: heart rate, PR-interval, QRS-duration, QT-interval, QTc-interval, RR interval. Clinical significance of ECG abnormalities was judged by Investigator.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 28)