In this study workers are trying to test the correlation between Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination and MRI brain/cranial ultrasound with early prediction of neurological developmental outcome of preterm neonates. This study is prospective cross-sectional collecting the data of patients according to daily standard medical practice
The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the neurobehavioural performance of infants born preterm using the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) in standard medical practice and compare it with the gold standard MRI and ultrasound imagings. It would be possible to check do we need to use all the 3 examinations or Hammersmith examination would be enough reliable predictor. Secondary aim is to explore the relationships between MRI brain /cranial us abnormalities and HINE at term-equivalent age in infants born preterm in prediction of neurological outcome at 1 year of chronological age. This study will be only single arm/single group. This group would receive the regular practice of MRI, Ultrasound (US) and Hammersmith assessments. The 3 assessments would be compared in relationships with the neonatal developmental outcomes (developmental milestones).
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
50
No medical intervention would be done. The single arm would receive regular practice of Hammersmith Assessment and MRI / Ultrasound
Abha Private Hospital
Abhā, Saudi Arabia
Non inferiority of MRI to Hammersmith assessments in developmental outcomes
Hammersmith assessment will be tested for non-inferiority to gold standard assessment method by MRI in terms of sensitivity for early prediction of delayed neurological syndrome (DNS)
Time frame: 12 month
Superiority testing for Hammersmith assessment to gold standard MRI
Testing the superiority of Hammersmith assessment versus gold standard MRI in terms sensitivity for early prediction of DNS
Time frame: 12 month
Comparing the correlations of MRI and US scans with early prediction of DNS
Comparing the correlations of MRI and US scans with the early prediction of DNS
Time frame: 12 month
Comparing the correlations of US scan and Hammersmith assessment
Comparing the correlations of US scan and Hammersmith assessment with the early prediction of DNS
Time frame: 12 month
Hammersmith health economic analyses if primary endpoint is achieved
Both cost minimization analyses and cost effective analyses would be applied
Time frame: 12 month
Specificity and sensitivity for all techniques MRI, US and Hammersmith
Calculations for specificity and sensitivity would be applied for MRI, US and Hammersmith
Time frame: 12 month
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.