Comparison of the clinical healing of simultaneous vs. delayed grafting for dental implant placement.
The primary aims of this study are to compare the clinical and histologic results of a traditional ridge preservation with implant placement at 16 weeks (control group) with early implant placement (8 weeks) with simultaneous contour augmentation as described by Buser (test group).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
7
8 weeks post-extraction 15 test patients will receive implant placement plus osseous grafting.
At the time of extraction osseous graft will be placed in the socket and implant placed 4 months later.
Graduate Periodontics, UofL School of Dentistry
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Final ridge width for simultaneous and delayed grafting treatment.
Measure final ridge width to determine if adequate bone is available.
Time frame: 16 to 20 weeks
Soft tissue thickness
Facial and occlusal
Time frame: 16 to 20 weeks
Histology
Histologic composition for control group only
Time frame: 16 weeks
Implant dehiscence
Implant dehiscence
Time frame: 20 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.