Cement retention has been widely used for implant-supported fixed partial dentures in daily dental practice. The cementation approach indeed offers straightforward clinical application protocol which is basically conceptualized for tooth/teeth supported fixed restorations. However, removal of excess cement around implant restorations presents specific difficulties. More importantly, there are certain biological consequences due to residual cement leftover in peri-implant sulcus. There is no evidence based guidance with regards to cementation techniques applied for implant supported fixed restorations due to limited clinical studies. Therefore the aim of this clinical trial is to compare three different cementation technique with regards to removal of excess cement and other clinical subsidiaries (abutment margin, crown surface and contour) involving indirectly as well.
Single-tooth implant crowns to replace missing molar tooth were addressed to qualify and quantify residual cement on implant-abutment complex and peri-implant soft tissue following cementation. Thirty bone-level dental implants of one kind enrolled in the study. Prior to delivery of screw-retained crowns completed for usual treatment, implants were allocated randomly to a trial comparison group. Three different cement loading approach, ten in each group, was applied using cement-retained trial crowns on prefabricated metal abutments. Following completion of the assigned cementation technique, the trial crown was removed with its abutment accessing from the occlusal hole prepared after removal of excess cement. Then, the presence of residual cement on implant-abutment complex and implant soft tissue in accordance with axial and proximal surfaces was qualified. To quantify the amount of residual cement in accordance with location and distribution, the crown-abutment complex was digitized three-dimensionally using an intra-oral scanner. The output of surface data was evaluated in virtual 3-D image for cement excess, when detected location in the abutment-crown complex is recorded, area and distribution was calculated using a software. The frequency of occurrence and quantity of residual cement of 3-different cementation techniques was statistically evaluated using logistic and linear regression model separately considering abutment margin, crown surface and contour.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
10
intraoral cementation of single-tooth implant crowns with three different technique, intraoral removal of cement excess upon setting
Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
visual assessment of residual cement on crown-abutment complex
removal of cemented crown-abutment complex to detect excess cement on the mesial, distal, buccal and lingual surfaces of crown and abutment separately scoring: presence or absence
Time frame: 15 minutes
measurement of residual cement area and distribution
digitalization of the removed crown-abutment complexes those scored with cement presence, then using a software, virtual selection of existing cement to calculate the area in millimeter square and to define the direction and the extension in millimeters on the mesial, distal, buccal and lingual surfaces of crown and abutment separately
Time frame: 30 minutes
visual assessment of residual cement around the peri-implant soft tissue
removal of cemented crown-abutment complex to detect excess cement on the peri-implant soft tissue contacting the mesial, distal, buccal and lingual surfaces of crown-implant complex scoring: presence or absence
Time frame: 15 minutes
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.