This randomized controlled study is designed to test absorbable suture compared to non absorbable suture in laparoscopic sacral colpopexy in terms of anatomical correction of the prolapse, post-operative and long term morbidity, rate of recurrence, subjective satisfaction of the patient and rate of mesh erosion.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
150
laparoscopic sacral colpopexy to correct pelvic organ prolapse with anterior and posterior meshes with absorbable suture
laparoscopic sacral colpopexy to correct pelvic organ prolapse with anterior and posterior meshes with non absorbable suture
ospedale regionale Miulli
Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
Number of patients with anatomical correction of the prolapse
Anatomical correction of the prolapse evaluated by gynecological visit
Time frame: 1 year
rate mesh erosion
Time frame: 1 year
long term outcomes
development of nicturia, dysuria, obstructed defecation , urinary incontinence
Time frame: 1 year
Rate of recurrence
de novo anterior or central or posterior compartment prolapse
Time frame: 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.