This study is conducted to evaluate the performance of a rapid, point-of-care in vitro diagnostic device (Sinu-Test®) for the qualitative detection of the three most common pathogens responsible for causing bacterial sinusitis.
Mucous specimens will be collected from patients displaying symptoms of acute bacterial sinusitis enrolled by primary care and/or otolaryngology clinics in the United States. Health care professionals not having endoscopy certification will collect specimens using the Entvantage sample collection device. Health care professionals with nasal endoscopy certification or specialty training will collect comparator specimens using an endoscope. Untrained operators with a range of education and training (primary care physician, otolaryngologist, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, registered nurse or other healthcare professional), will perform the Sinu-Test® lateral flow assay in an outpatient setting. Mucous samples will be tested for the presence of 3 bacterial pathogens responsible for sinusitis using the Sinu-Test® in the clinic and by a composite comparator method comprised of standard quantitative bacterial culture with identification (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-Time of Flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry instrument) and semiquantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (real-time PCR) of the residual culture sample and the Sinu-Test® residual swab performed by a central laboratory.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
800
IVD for qualitative detection of 3 bacterial pathogens (Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae)
Quantitative bacterial culture assay with isolate identification by MALDI-TOF.
Semiquantitative real-time PCR assay
Northern California Research
Sacramento, California, United States
Hillcrest Medical Research
DeLand, Florida, United States
ENT Allergy & Associates of South Florida
Port Saint Lucie, Florida, United States
Tandem Clinical Research
Marrero, Louisiana, United States
Sensitivity (positive predictive agreement) and specificity (negative predictive agreement) of the diagnostic device
Assessment of the true positive and true negative rate of the point-of-care test device relative to the composite reference standard for each of the 3 bacterial microorganisms.
Time frame: Cumulation of one-time subject sample results obtained in 20-30 minutes for point-of-care test and 3-5 days for lab results
Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV)
Positive predictive value is the probability that subjects with a positive point-of-care test truly have the bacteria present. Negative predictive value is the probability that subjects with a negative point-of-care test truly do not have the bacteria present.
Time frame: Cumulation of one-time subject sample results obtained in 20-30 minutes for point-of-care test and 3-5 days for lab results
Positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-)
LR+ is equivalent to the probability of a true positive result divided by the probability of a false positive result. LR- is equivalent to the probability of a false negative result divided by the probability of a true negative result.
Time frame: Cumulation of one-time subject sample results obtained in 20-30 minutes for point-of-care test and 3-5 days for lab results
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Northwell Health
New Hyde Park, New York, United States
Optimed Research/Ohio Sinus Institute
Dublin, Ohio, United States
Kelsey-Seybold Clinic
Houston, Texas, United States