Accuracy of 3DPrinted Windowed Bracket- Positioning Guide Compared To Thermoformed Indirect Bonding Tray

Cairo University132 enrolled

Overview

this study was aimed to evaluate of accuracy of 3DPrinted windowed Bracket- Positioning Guide in compare to Thermoformed Transfer Tray For Orthodontic Indirect Bonding

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

OTHER

Masking

SINGLE

Enrollment

132

Conditions

Inaccurate Transfer and Bond Failure of Conventional Indirect Bonding Tray Accuracy of Bracket Transfer and Bond Failure Rate of Digitally Printed Transfer Tray With Windows and Conventional Thermoformed Transfer Tray

Interventions

3DPrinted Windowed Bracket- Positioning trayDEVICE

3 D printed tray with windows for accurate positioning of brackets

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 13 YearsMax age: 25 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age: above 13 years. 2. Complete set of permanent teeth including second molar. 3. No sex predilection. 4. Class I Mild to moderate crowding (4-6 mm). Exclusion Criteria: 1. Surface enamel defect that compromise bonding 2. No or poor patient's compliance. 3. Psychological problems. 4. Pathology at the site of intervention. 5. Insufficient crown height that contradicts bonding of brackets. 6. Labial and buccal Restorations. 7. Poor oral hygiene. 8. Severely rotated teeth

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

accuracy of 3D printed transfer tray with windows& conventional thermoformed transfer tray

using digital measurements on 3 shape software in mm degrees

Time frame: immediate

Secondary Outcomes

chairside time

digital stopwatch in seconds

Time frame: immediate

immediate bond failure

counting after bonding number of brackets or tubes failed immediately

Time frame: immediate

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.