The main goal of this study is to improve the outcome of children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia with high risk first relapse by optimization of treatment strategies within a large international trial and the integration of new agents.
Though survival of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has considerably improved over the past few decades, relapsed ALL remains a leading cause of mortality in children with cancer. Risk has been defined by the International (I) Berlin, Frankfurt, Münster (BFM) Study Group (SG) based on duration of first remission, immunophenotype of malignant clone, and site of relapse. Patients classified as high risk (HR) by these criteria have poor response rates to standard induction therapy, high rates of subsequent relapse and require an allogeneic hematopoetic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for consolidation of 2nd remission. Over the last decade members of the I-BFM-SG have investigated the use of different combinations of conventional cytotoxic agents. Even with allo-HSCT, none of these approaches have improved outcome above 40%. Therefore, for HR patients there is a need to investigate the curative potential of new agents combined with systemic therapy. The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib has shown synergistic activity with acceptable toxicity when combined with corticosteroids, anthracyclines and alkylating agents in adult patients with cancer as well as with dexamethasone, doxorubicin, vincristine and polyethylene glycol (PEG) asparaginase in children with refractory or relapsed ALL. In the I-BFM-SG International Study for Treatment of High Risk Childhood Relapsed ALL (IntReALL) HR 2010 study, the potential of Bortezomib combined with a modified ALL relapse protocol 3 (R3) backbone as induction regimen for HR patients to improve complete 2nd remission (CR2) rates will be investigated in a randomized phase II design. Induction is followed by conventional intensive consolidation. After termination of the trial patients may be subjected to an investigational window, before all of them receive allo-HSCT.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
250
Patients randomised to the HR-B arm receive induction, consolidation with the modified ALL R3 protocol. In this arm, patients are randomized to receive Bortezomib together with the ALL R3 protocol during induction. Administration of Bortezomib: 1.3 mg/m2 as intravenous bolus or subcutaneously (SC, at the discretion of the treating physician) on days 1 and 4 of weeks 1 and 3.
Australian & New Zealand Childhood Hematology & Oncology Group
Clayton, Victoria, Australia
RECRUITINGSt. Anna Kinderkrebsforschung, CCRI
Vienna, Austria
Rate of Complete Remission
Rate of complete second remission (CR2) quantified by cytology after induction with standard chemotherapy + bortezomib (arm B) compared with standard chemotherapy (arm A).
Time frame: Week 4
Event-free Survival
Improvement of three years event-free survival (EFS)
Time frame: Year 3
Overall Survival
Improvement of three years overall survival (OS)
Time frame: Year 3
Minimal Residual Disease Reduction (MRD)
Improvement of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) reduction after induction with versus without bortezomib
Time frame: Week 4
Minimal Residual Disease Load
Improvement of MRD load prior to stem cell transplantation (SCT).
Time frame: Week 15
Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)
Prognostic relevance of MRD pre stem cell transplantation (SCT). MRD will be quantified before stem cell transplantation with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and will be related to EFS after SCT. Multicolour flow cytometry will be used in parallel with PCR. Flow cytometry is used instead of PCR if PCR based MRD-quantification cannot be performed, because criteria for a reliable and reproducible sensitive quantification are not fulfilled.
Time frame: Week 15
Complete Remission/Minimal Residual Disease Rates During Consolidation
Improvement of CR2 and/or MRD rates during consolidation
Time frame: Week 5, 8, 11, 15
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Hòpital Universitaire des Enfants Reine Fabiola
Brussels, Belgium
RECRUITINGUniversity Hospital Motol
Prague, Czechia
RECRUITINGCopenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet)
Copenhagen, Denmark
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGTurku University Central Hospital
Turku, Finland
RECRUITINGCHU Nice
Nice, France
RECRUITINGTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Centre
Tel Aviv, Israel
RECRUITINGOspedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù
Roma, Italy
RECRUITINGPrinses Máxima Centrum, Lundlaan
Utrecht, Netherlands
RECRUITING...and 5 more locations
Toxicity of induction classified with the COMMON TOXICITY CRITERIA (CTC)
Toxicity of induction with versus without bortezomib. Toxicity of the central nervous system and peripheral neuropathy will be classified with the COMMON TOXICITY CRITERIA (CTC).
Time frame: At induction up to week 5