This pilot trial studies how well active surveillance and chemotherapy before surgery work in treating participants with stage II-III rectal cancer. Active surveillance involves monitoring participants for additional tumor growth after receiving cancer treatment. Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. It is not yet known whether deferring surgery after active surveillance and chemotherapy will work better in treating participants with stage II-III rectal cancer.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To quantify the rates of organ preservation and tumor regrowth with non-operative management of locally advanced rectal cancer in patients achieving a clinical complete response (cCR). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To correlate clinical, radiographic, and pathologic findings after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer. II. To determine the impact of active surveillance with deferral of surgery on oncologic outcomes. III. To assess decision quality for patients with rectal cancer facing multiple treatment options. IV. To explore the impact of patient-provider communication on patient decisions for surgical versus nonsurgical treatment decision for rectal cancer. V. To assess safety of deferral of surgery in distal rectal cancer patients with possibility of cohort expansion to more proximal locally advanced rectal cancer patients. CORRELATIVE OBJECTIVES: I. Obtain tissue to monitor treatment response and any future biomarker analyses OUTLINE: Participants are assigned to 1 of 2 groups. GROUP I: Participants who have achieved clinical complete response undergo standard surgical resection. GROUP II: Participants who have achieved clinical complete response receive active surveillance and consolidated chemotherapy for up to 4 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Participants with incomplete response or regrowth of tumor, undergo surgical resection as in Group I. After the completion of study treatment, participants in Group I are followed up at 6 and 12 months, and then once a year for up to 3 years. Participants in Group II are followed up every 3 months for 18 months, every 6 months for 2 years, and then every year for up to 3 years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
120
Receive chemotherapy
Receive active surveillance
Ancillary studies
Undergo surgical resection
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
RECRUITINGOverall organ preservation rate
The study will estimate overall organ preservation rate at 12 months and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The exact confidence interval will be computed when observed number of events is limited. The 12-month organ preservation rate corresponds to the proportion of patients alive and not having surgery within 12 months. The study will use Kaplan-Meier methods to estimate probability of overall organ preservation at 12 months at 12 months for all patients and for deferral patients respectively.
Time frame: At 12 months
Local tumor regrowth rate
The study will estimate local tumor regrowth rate at 12 months and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The exact confidence interval will be computed when observed number of events is limited. The 12-month organ preservation rate corresponds to the proportion of patients alive and not having surgery within 12 months. The study will use Kaplan-Meier methods to estimate probability of local tumor regrowth at 12 months for all patients and for deferral patients respectively.
Time frame: At 12 months
Time to surgery or death
The study will use Kaplan-Meier methods to estimate probability for deferral patients respectively.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Decision quality assessment determined by European Organization for Treatment and Research of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ30+CR29)
The aspects of the patient's decision making process will be documented and studied to assess what criteria, including the impact of patient-provider communication, seem to be driving the patients' decision to delay surgery or not. The decision evaluation questions such as decision quality survey, satisfaction with decision and anticipated regret questionnaire will be documented and summarized. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize continuous variables and frequency and percentage will be used to tabulate categorical variables. The study will summarize quality of life measures, toxicity, surgical success rates, clinical, radiographic and pathologic findings, and exploratory comparisons among patient cohorts will be done.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Overall survival (OS)
Overall survival will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Regression-free survival (RFS)
Regression-free survival will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Incidence of adverse events graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Surgical success rates
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Radiographic Findings
MRI performed.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Pathologic Findings
Blood and tissue collected at various time points.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.