In this trial, the investigators would like to understand why a small percentage of patients will be refractory to ESA (independently of International prognostic scoring system (IPSS) and % of blasts). In a retrospective study of the "Groupe Francophone des Myélodysplasies (GFM)" , the investigators showed that about 43% of patients are refractory or will relapse after initial response to ESA and it has been shown that these patients have a poorer survival. The investigators plan to give a 12-week treatment of Epoetin alfa or zeta in low risk MDS patients and measure different biological factors to predict response to ESA: * evaluation by flow cytometry before and after treatment of the degree of dyserythropoiesis and dysgranulopoiesis which could explain the primary resistance or loss of response of a subset of patients, * screening by molecular biology of predictive factors of response to ESA, * Iron homeostasis will be measured via hepcidin, GDF-15 and ferritin levels.
Lower risk MDS patients, with LOW and INT-1 IPSS score, with anemia Hb\<10g/dl, requiring or not Red blood cel (RBC) transfusions, treated by erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) according to national French recommendations ( epoetin zeta 40000 UI/week in lower risk MDS, \<10% blasts, with Hb\<10g/dl and sEPO\<500UI/l, for 12 weeks). BM aspirates are collected prospectively at T0 and at W12 of ESA treatment. BM aspirates will be collected prospectively at inclusion in all 70 patients, after 12 weeks, in 70 patients. Fresh bone marrow samples will be centralized at Cochin hospital for flow cytometry analysis of dyserythropoiesis and gene sequencing (Hematology laboratory, Cochin, Paris). "Ogata flow cytometry score" will be assessed locally in Mulhouse, Creteil, Tours, Grenoble or Cochin. Patients have been reevaluated at week 12 by flow cytometry "Ogata score". Blood plasma will be been collected for analysis of GDF-15 and hepcidin, and sent to Cochin (Institut Cochin, Paris). Hepcidin level was measured by LC-MS/MS method in Louis Mourier Hospital. Red score analysis was done in a centralized manner in Cochin, according to the methods described previously. Basically, it was evaluated on CD36, CD71 CV and Hb level according to the gender. Genomic studies and Bioinformatic analysis Mutations in a selected panel of 39 genes will be screened in the 70 samples by a Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) assay. Sample size justification and Statistical analysis Sample size computation was based on the secondary endpoint which was the response rate. The investigators expected a response rate of 50-60%, therefore about 30 patients will be responders and 30 patients non responders. With 10%-15% of non evaluable biological data, n=70 patients should be included.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
70
Patients received epoetin zeta (Retacrit®) 40000UI/week subcutaneously during 12 weeks. Response has been evaluated at 12 weeks according to IWG 2006 criteria. Patients with response continued on epoetin zeta. In non-responders, the patients have been excluded from the protocol.
Determination of the Red score on the prediction of response to ESA
The flow cytometry (FCM) "Red score" described by Mathis et al, Leukemia 2013, ranges from 0 to 7 and includes CD36 and CD71 CV and Hb levels.
Time frame: 5 years
Determination of Ogata FCM score on the prediction of response to ESA
The "Ogata FCM score" described by Ogata et al, Haematologica 2009, ranges from 0 to 4 and includes parameters of dysgranulopoiesis and excess of CD34+ blasts
Time frame: 5 years
Determination of the number of molecular gene mutations on the prediction of response to ESA
Gene mutations numbers, assessed by next generation sequencing on a 39 gene panel
Time frame: 5 years
Determination of GDF-15 levels on the prediction of response to ESA
Mean and median values of GDF15 (pg/ml) levels
Time frame: 5 years
Determination of hepcidin levels on the prediction of response to ESA
Mean and median values of hepcidin (ng/ml)
Time frame: 5 years
Response rate to ESA
Response rate will be evaluated by IWG 2006 criteria of erythroid response.
Time frame: 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.