Objective: To examine the effects of a structured advance care planning (ACP) guide among patients with advanced illness in hospital care setting. Methods: This is a 24-month stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial to be conducted in the Department of Medicine in an acute hospital. Patients are eligible to the study if they are aged 18 or over, are communicable, and meet the indicators of health deterioration or advanced condition in the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT). Ward nurses will be trained to be interventionists to conduct ACP by means of a structured ACP guide. The guide is adapted from a culturally sensitive ACP programme developed in the local context with reference to the format of the Serious Illness Communication Guide, which is an evidence-based best practice in end-of-life care communication to support the ACP process. Main outcome measures: Data will be collected at baseline (T0), one week (T1), three months (T2) and six months (T3) after intervention. The primary study outcome is the documentation of ACP discussion in medical records and completion of advance directives. Secondary outcomes are communicating end-of-life care preferences with family carers, quality of life and concordance of care preferences and treatment provided.
Advance care planning (ACP) is defined as a communication process among patients, their family members and healthcare providers about end-of-life care, before the patients lose their capacity to decide for themselves. The main purpose of this study is to embed ACP into the usual care process in acute hospital setting through building staff capacity to conduct ACP. This will be a 24-month stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial, with randomization built into the phasing of intervention implementation. This crossover design enables all study venues sequentially switched from control to experimental. This study will be conducted in all eight wards of the medical department of an 800-bed acute hospital. The ACP in this study is a facilitator-based intervention with a structured communication guide as a tool to aid the interventionists in broaching end-of-life care issues and eliciting patients' values and preferences in a consistent manner. The primary study outcome is the documentation of ACP discussion in medical records. Secondary outcomes are communicating end-of-life care preferences with family carers, quality of life and concordance of care preferences and treatment provided. Data collection will be conducted at baseline, one week, three months and six months after intervention.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
350
The ACP guide is adapted from the Serious Illness Communication Guide and a culturally-sensitive ACP programme developed in the local context. The trained ACP facilitators will initiate the conversation by introducing the concepts of ACP with the support of the guide and assessing the patient's illness understanding and readiness to think about end-of-life care issues.
In the current practice, patients will have to take the initiative themselves if they would like to discuss their end-of-life care or make an advance directive.
Yan Chai Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Documentation
Documentation of ACP discussion in medical record
Time frame: 3 months
Family communication
Communication of end-of-life care preferences with family members
Time frame: 3 months
Self perceived quality-of-life of patients
Quality-of-life concerns at the end of life (QOLC-E)
Time frame: 3 months
Concordance of care
Concordance of care preferences and actual
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.