The authors hypothesize that a pelvic kinematic disorder, demonstrated by a significant decrease in sacral slope, is associated with the risk of instability of total hip prosthesis, the sacral slope being measured by an EOS imaging system during the transition to sitting in unstable patients versus patients with no history of instability.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
80
Whole body EOS imaging in seated and standing position
CHU Lapeyronie de Montpellier
Montpellier, France
CHU Nimes
Nîmes, France
Sacral slope between standing to sitting difference between groups
Sacral slope between standing to sitting difference between groups
Time frame: Day 0
Rate of type 1 pelvic kinematic disorder between groups
Measured by sacral slope difference from standing to seated position \< 12°.
Time frame: Day 0
Lumbar lordosis between standing and seating between groups
degree
Time frame: Day 0
Femoroacetabular flexion between standing and seating between groups
degree
Time frame: Day 0
Lewinnek plane (Anterior pelvic plane) between standing and seating between groups
degree
Time frame: Day 0
Pelvic version between standing and seating between groups
degree
Time frame: Day 0
Classification of patients' pelvic kinematic disorder (Type 1 or 2)
Type 1 = Difference in sacral slope between standing and seated position \< 12° Type 2 = pelvic version \< 20° standing
Time frame: Day 0
Classification of patients according to pelvic incidence
Presence/absence
Time frame: Day 0
Classification of patients according to sacral slope
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Presence/absence
Time frame: Day 0
Classification of patients according to sagittal imbalance
Presence/absence of: Sagittal Vertical Axis \> 50 mm; Spino-Sacral Angle \< 127°
Time frame: Day 0
Evolution of acetabular positioning (anteversion and inclination in degree) from standing to sitting
Degree
Time frame: Day 0