This is a feasibility and acceptability study of a 16-month single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to test the initial effectiveness of a well-being and small lifestyle changes intervention aimed at promoting weight loss and stress reduction in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Primary goals of this study are to 1) evaluate study feasibility and patient acceptability, 2) develop a tailored protocol of a behavioral intervention for overweight or obese patients with type 2 diabetes that takes stress and well-being into consideration, 3) evaluate appropriateness of research procedures and measures, 4) examine effect size estimates of key outcomes to provide essential data to inform a larger efficacy trial, 5) determine whether clinically significant improvements occurred in any key outcomes.
Overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes will be recruited at 2 different diabetes clinics. Physicians will screen every patient attending to each clinic during the enrollment period for the presence of main eligibility criteria. Those patients who appear to be eligible will be introduced to the study and referred to a researcher for a more in-depth screening evaluation. Eligible patients who are interested in participating in the study will be asked to sign the informed consent. Consecutive patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to an experimental group or a control group. During the first month, participants in the experimental group will receive a well-being promoting intervention in adjunction to the treatment as usual (TAU), while those in the control group will be asked to follow the TAU. In the following 3 months participants in both groups will receive the small change intervention in adjunction to the the TAU. All in person sessions of the intervention will take place in an office of both the 2 diabetes clinics involved. Data about psychological and clinical variables will be collected for each participant through questionnaires and interviews at baseline, at post-intervention, and at 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Participants' weight will be measured at each assessment point using a scale. Medical charts will be accessed to collect further data about physiological parameters, treatment received and medical history.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
58
The small change intervention is a behavioral intervention to help people gradually lose weight by making small changes in their lifestyle. At the beginning of the intervention participants will be met in person to be guided in setting an eating and a physical activity goal. Participants will be then contacted through the phone or met in person weekly for 3 months to check on their adherence to the selected goals and to discuss about facilitators and barriers to goal completion, in order to increase their motivation and problem solving skills. Every weekly contact will last about an hour and will be administered in an individual setting. At each contact selected goals can be revised, changed or another goal can be added based on levels of adherence.
The well-being intervention is a coaching intervention aimed at motivating people in making lifestyle changes by reducing levels of stress through the promotion of psychological well-being. It will consists in 4 weekly sessions to be held before starting the small change intervention. Each session will last about an hour and will be administered in an individual setting.
The treatment as usual includes any recommendation given to the participants by their physicians, including diet, physical activity, medication and glycemic control instructions.
Struttura Semplice di Endocrinologia e Metabolismo, Ospedale Oglio Po
Casalmaggiore, Cremona, Italy
Servizio Endocrinologia e Diabetologia, Ospedale Bufalini
Cesena, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
Feasibility (Recruitment)
Measured as the acceptance rate (total number of participants enrolled out of the total number of eligible candidates approached).
Time frame: Baseline
Feasibility (Retention)
Measured as drop-out rates (total number of participants who withdraw out of the total number enrolled).
Time frame: Through study completion, intended to be 16 months
Feasibility (Acceptability of Intervention)
Measured as total number of sessions attended and number of weeks needed to complete the intervention. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted to estimate patients' satisfaction and provide data on optimal timing, dosing, and delivery.
Time frame: Post-intervention, intended to be 4 months
Change in Psychological Distress
Measured by the Symptoms Questionnaire (SQ), a 92-item self-rating scale with yes/no responses (or true/false for some questions to avoid double-negative statements) divided into four domains: anxiety, depression, somatic, and anger-hostility. Each domain is further divided into two sub-scales: one sub-scale with 17 symptom questions and one sub-scale with 6 questions that are antonyms of some of the symptom questions in order to measure well-being. A response of yes/true for a symptom question gives 1 point, and a response of no/false for a well-being question gives 1 point for a score ranging from 0-17 for each symptom sub-scale and 0-6 for each well-being sub-scale, where a higher score indicates greater distress. If the well-being score is calculated separately the raw score can be subtracted from 6 for a score ranging from 0-6, where a higher score indicates greater well-being.
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention (intended to be 4 months), 6 months post-intervention, 12 months post-intervention
Change in Psychological Distress and Well-Being
Measured by the Psychosocial Index (PSI), a 55-item self-rating scale divided into five domains: Sociodemographic and clinical data: 12 questions including routine medical and demographic information. Stress: 17 yes/no questions with a score from 0-17. A higher score indicates greater stress. Well-being: 6 yes/no questions with a score from 0-6. A higher score indicates greater psychological well-being. Psychological distress: 15 four-point questions from 0-3, with a total score from 0-45. A higher score indicates greater psychological distress. 4 questions referring to sleep may be scored separately. Abnormal illness behavior: 3 four-point questions from 0-3, with a total score from 0-9. A higher score indicates more severe abnormal illness behavior. Quality of life: 1 four-point question, with a score from 0 to 4. A higher score indicates a higher quality of life. Psychological well-being and quality of life scores can be summed for a global well-being score from 0-10.
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention (intended to be 4 months), 6 months post-intervention, 12 months post-intervention
Change in Psychological Well-Being
Measured by the Psychological Well-Being scale (PWB), a 42-question self-rating scale for the assessment of 6 dimensions: self-acceptance, positive relations with others, autonomy, environmental mastery, purpose in life and personal growth. Each of the 42 six-point response questions are given a score from 1-6, with questions phrased in the negative reversed (e.g. 1 to 6, 6 to 1). The total score in each dimension ranges from 7-42, and all the dimensions scores are summed to give a final total ranging from 42-252, with higher scores indicating greater psychological well-being.
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention (intended to be 4 months), 6 months post-intervention, 12 months post-intervention
% Weight Change
Measured in kg.
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention (intended to be 4 months), 6 months post-intervention, 12 months post-intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.