The goal of this pilot is to evaluate a novel restraint device in 8 older mechanically ventilated patients to demonstrate that 1) the revised novel restraint prototype is safe and 2) a future randomized controlled trial (RCT) is feasible.
The goal of this Fast-Track Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) project is to optimize and test a novel arm restraint in older critically ill mechanically ventilated patients that may increase mobility; reduce agitation, use of sedative medications, and delirium; and exhibit high satisfaction and acceptability among hospital staff, family members, and patients. Older mechanically ventilated patients are often immobilized with wrist restraints to prevent self-extubation and are sedated to reduce agitation caused by their restraints and endotracheal (breathing) tube. This sedation and immobility lead to complications, including delirium and muscle weakness, that are independently associated with long term cognitive impairment, reduced physical functioning, and mortality. Specifically, the incidence and duration of delirium in the ICU are strongly and independently associated with long-term cognitive impairment that is similar to Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias. Healthy Design has developed a novel restraint device that allows arm mobility but prohibits hands from reaching oral/nasal endotracheal and feeding tubes or intravenous lines. Because it permits mobility, the novel restraint may reduce agitation and the need for sedatives. The objectives of this pilot study are to evaluate the novel restraint in 8 older mechanically ventilated patients to demonstrate that 1) the revised novel restraint prototype is safe and 2) a future RCT is feasible.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
8
Use of a novel arm restraint
University of Vermont College of Medicine
Burlington, Vermont, United States
Number of Treatment-Emergent Severe Adverse Events [Safety]
Safety will be measured by the number (i.e. \< 1 in 5 participants had a treatment emergent safety event per their on study time) across all of the following measures listed below. Incidence does not have to be per person-year; in this case it is incidence of safety adverse event during the study period.
Time frame: Through study day 2
Number of Clinician or Patient Lacerations
Grade 2b or higher skin laceration (per Skin Tear Audit Research \[STAR\] Skin Tear Classification System) in patient or clinician from any sharp edges of device. The STAR grading system ranges from grade 1a at best to 3 at worst. Each laceration is given an individual score based on appearance.
Time frame: Through study day 2
Number of Pressure Ulcers From Device
Development of pressure ulcer from device of Stage 3 or greater per 2016 National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure Injury Stages. This staging system provides an individual score to each pressure ulcer based on appearance from stage 1 (best) to stage 4 (worst)
Time frame: Through study day 2
Number of Self-removals of Novel Restraint
Self-removal of novel restraint
Time frame: Through study day 2
Number of Damaging Events to Hospital Bed Rendering it Non-functional
Any damage to hospital bed from restraint device rendering it non-functional
Time frame: Through study day 2
Number of Damaging Events to ICU Equipment
Any damage to ICU equipment (e.g. ventilator) rendering it non-functional
Time frame: Through study day 2
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Number of Self-extubations
Will record instances where participants remove own endotracheal tube
Time frame: Through study day 2
Number of Movements of Upper Extremities
Actigraphy counts of upper extremities as measured by Philliips actigraph, a device that records individual movements
Time frame: Continuously through study day 2
Richmond Agitation Sedation Score [RASS]
Agitation measured by the median of Richmond agitation sedation score \[RASS\] collected longitudinally every hour while wearing restraints. This score measures sedation and agitation from a scale of -5 (most sedated) to +4 (most agitated)
Time frame: Median of multiple RASS scores collected over first 2 days of study period
Satisfaction With Novel Device as Assessed by the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction With Assistive Technology (QUEST) Satisfaction Score
Satisfaction with the novel restraint device will be measured with the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST) satisfaction tool. This 12-item questionnaire is scored from 1 (lowest satisfaction) to 5 (highest satisfaction).
Time frame: Study day 2
Delerium Score
We intended to measure delirium score as accessed by the CAM-ICU. However, during the study we were unable to measure it because it was too often incorrectly charted by nursing. We therefore have nothing to report for this planned outcome.
Time frame: 6-day study period