This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of concurrent mirror therapy (MT) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in augmenting the efficacy of the lower limb task-oriented training in people with stroke. It is hypothesize that MT combined with TENS would be superior to sham-mirror therapy with TENS, or MT with placebo-TENS, or control training only in improving lower limb motor functions and walking ability in people with stroke when combined with the lower limb task-oriented training.
The application of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) over a paretic lower limb could augment the effects of task-oriented exercise therapy on lower limb motor function in people with stroke, possibly through increased excitability of sensorimotor cortex. In mirror therapy (MT), the intact limb performs motor tasks while its mirror reflection is superimposed over the covered paretic limb, creating a visual illusion of enhanced function over the paretic limb. The visual input during MT could substitute for reduced proprioceptive inputs and increase spatial attention of the paretic limb, which could improve motor function of the paretic limb, possibly through increased cortical activity in the lesioned hemisphere and mirror neurone system. The next question concerns whether MT could be combined with TENS and whether their synergetic effects could maximise the motor output of paretic limbs in people with stroke.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
100
A customised angle-adjustable frame with a mirror board (60 × 90 cm) will be used. All subjects are instructed to perform hip flexion/abduction, knee flexion/extension and ankle dorsiflexion/plantarflexion on the intact-limb during a 15 minutes period.
TENS will be delivered to the common peroneal nerve of the paretic leg. The stimulation frequency will be 100Hz and with an intensity just below the motor threshold.
The lower-limb task-oriented training comprises 6 exercises, namely stepping up and down, heel lift a dorsiflexed position, partial squatting, kicking a ball with alternate legs, gait re-education and transition training. Each exercise last for 10 minutes
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
RECRUITINGThe Change of Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity (FMA-LE)
FMA-LE is used to evaluate the lower extremity motor control, including reflexes, voluntary control of isolated movement and coordination. The scale score ranging from 0 to 34, with 17 items and ordinal scoring from 0 to 2. A higher score indicates a better lower extremity motor control. The assessment will be conducted at baseline, mid-intervention (4 weeks), post-intervention (8 weeks) and 3-month follow-up (20 weeks).
Time frame: Baseline (0 week), Mid-intervention (4 weeks), Post-intervention (8 weeks), 3-month follow-up (20 weeks)
The Change of Paretic ankle dorsiflexor strength
The subject's paretic ankle dorsiflexor strength (in kilograms) is measured with a Nicholas hand-held dynamometer (model 01,160, Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette, IN) in supine lying position. The muscle strength will be measured twice. The average strength of the 2 trials will be recorded. A higher value indicated a better paretic ankle dorsiflexor strength. The assessment will be conducted at baseline, mid-intervention (4 weeks), post-intervention (8 weeks) and 3-month follow-up (20 weeks).
Time frame: Baseline (0 week), Mid-intervention (4 weeks), Post-intervention (8 weeks), 3-month follow-up (20 weeks)
The Change of Paretic ankle plantarflexor strength
The subject's paretic ankle plantarflexor strength (in kilograms) is measured with a Nicholas hand-held dynamometer (model 01,160, Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette, IN) in supine lying position. The average strength of the 2 trials will be recorded. A higher value indicated a better paretic ankle plantarflexor strength. The assessment will be conducted at baseline, mid-intervention (4 weeks), post-intervention (8 weeks) and 3-month follow-up (20 weeks).
Time frame: Baseline (0 week), Mid-intervention (4 weeks), Post-intervention (8 weeks), 3-month follow-up (20 weeks)
The Change of 10-m walk test
10-m walk test is used to measure the walking speed in a short distance. The subject will be asked to walk 10 meter in a normal comfortable speed and maximum speed condition, respectively. The completion time will be records by stopwatch. Each condition will be repeated for 2 times. The completion time will be averaged. The shorter the completion time indicated the better performance in 10-m walk test. The assessment will be conducted at baseline, mid-intervention (4 weeks), post-intervention (8 weeks) and 3-month follow-up (20 weeks).
Time frame: Baseline (0 week), Mid-intervention (4 weeks), Post-intervention (8 weeks), 3-month follow-up (20 weeks)
The Change of Timed 'Up and Go' test
The Time 'Up and Go' test is used to measure the Functional mobility. Each subject will be required to rise from a chair with armrests, walk 3 m forward, turn around, return to the chair and sit down. The time taken to complete this task will be measured in seconds with a stopwatch. The assessment will be conducted at baseline, mid-intervention (4 weeks), post-intervention (8 weeks) and 3-month follow-up (20 weeks).
Time frame: Baseline (0 week), Mid-intervention (4 weeks), Post-intervention (8 weeks), 3-month follow-up (20 weeks)
The Change of Lower-extremity motor co-ordination test
The lower-extremity motor coordination test is used to measure the coordination of both the paretic and intact legs. Two red flat targets will be secured on the floor 30 cm apart. In sitting position with the feet resting flat on the floor and the heels on one of the targets, the participant will be instructed to touch 2 targets alternately with the big toe, as quickly and as accurately as possible, for 20 seconds. The number of times each target is touched will be counted. The more touch times indicated a better performance. The assessment will be conducted at baseline, mid-intervention (4 weeks), post-intervention (8 weeks) and 3-month follow-up (20 weeks).
Time frame: Baseline (0 week), Mid-intervention (4 weeks), Post-intervention (8 weeks), 3-month follow-up (20 weeks)
The Change of Cantonese version of Community Integration Measures (CIM-C)
The level of community integration will be assessed by the Cantonese version of Community Integration Measures (CIM-C). The CIM is a client-centred questionnaire with 10 items; each item rating from 1 to 5 with a total score from 10 to 50. A higher CIM-C score indicates a higher level of community integration. The assessment will be conducted at baseline, mid-intervention (4 weeks), post-intervention (8 weeks) and 3-month follow-up (20 weeks).
Time frame: Baseline (0 week), Mid-intervention (4 weeks), Post-intervention (8 weeks), 3-month follow-up (20 weeks)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.