The purpose of the study is to examine the effects of cognitive training on emotion regulation, impulse control, and aggression in people with schizophrenia. The study compares a combination of computerized cognitive remediation and social cognition training (CRT+SCT) to cognitive remediation alone (CRT). Study outcomes include multiple measures of aggression, emotion regulation, impulse control, cognition, and symptoms.
Neurocognitive and social cognitive impairments are contributors to negative emotionality and impulsive aggression in people with schizophrenia. Impulsive aggression poses several challenges to the care of people with schizophrenia. These include a greater risk of rehospitalization and longer hospital stays, involvement with the criminal justice system, and increased risk of recidivism. The investigators recently found that schizophrenia patients with aggression history experienced improvements in neurocognition as well as decreased hostility/agitation and incidents of verbal and physical aggression after participating in cognitive remediation training (CRT). Based on these findings, it is hypothesized that improving neurocognition through CRT may have enhanced the capacity of schizophrenia patients to inhibit aggression through improved emotion regulation capacity and impulse control. It is also postulated that the addition of Social Cognition Training (SCT) to CRT would provide greater benefits on emotion regulation and impulse control over CRT alone. To test the hypotheses, the investigators will conduct a clinical trial that compares two configurations of cognitive training--CRT plus SCT versus CRT plus control computer games. The goal of the study is to examine the comparative benefits of the two configurations of cognitive training on outcomes that include neurocognition, social cognition, emotion regulation, impulse control, and reactive aggression. Participants assigned to the CRT plus SCT group will complete 24 hours of CRT and 12 hours of SCT. Participants assigned to the CRT only group will complete 24 hours of CRT and 12 hours of control computer activities. Emotion regulation, impulse control, and reactive aggression will be indexed using laboratory-based challenges. The investigators will recruit and characterize 90 study participants on demographic and clinical variables including age, gender, education, aggression history, and medications. Study outcome measures will be administered at baseline and posttreatment to participants randomized to the study groups. In a subsample of 32 patients, the study investigators will further examine changes in the neural network of emotion regulation and impulsivity before and after cognitive training.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
90
Study compares two configurations of cognitive training--computerized cognitive remediation versus a combination of computerized cognitive remediation and social cognition training. The cognitive remediation therapy group will complete computerized training activities in attention, memory, processing speed, problem solving, and executive functions.
Study compares two configurations of cognitive training--computerized cognitive remediation versus a combination of computerized cognitive remediation and social cognition training. The combined cognitive remediation and social cognition training group will complete computerized training that target neurocognitive functions, facial affect emotion recognition and mentalizing tasks.
Manhattan Psychiatric Center
New York, New York, United States
NewYork Presbyterian Hospital
White Plains, New York, United States
Change in Aggression
Overt Aggression Scale-Modified (OAS-M); Taylor Aggression Paradigm (TAP); Point Subtraction Aggression Paradigm (PSAP).
Time frame: Change from baseline in aggression measures up to the end of intervention at 4 months
Change in cognitive outcomes
MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB); Emotion Recognition-40 (ER-40); Reading the Mind in the Eyes (Eyes Task)
Time frame: Change from baseline in cognition measures up to the end of intervention at 4 months
Change in Emotionality
Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS); Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS); Observer Alexithymia Scale (OAS)
Time frame: Change from baseline in emotionality measures up to the end of intervention at 4 months
Change in Emotion Regulation Capacity
Picture viewing task completed while peripheral psychophysiological response is obtained
Time frame: Change from baseline in measures up to the end of intervention at 4 months
Change in Impulse Control
Behavioral Impulse control tasks including Go-NoGo Task and Emotional Stop Task
Time frame: Change from baseline in impulse control measures up to the end of intervention at 4 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.