Trial of Aggressive Hydration Versus Rectal Indomethacin for Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

Overview

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a commonly performed endoscopic procedure used to treat pancreato-biliary pathology. Acute pancreatitis or post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), is the most common major complication of ERCP, which is reported to occur in 2-10% of patients overall (ranging from 2-4% in low risk patients up to 8-40% in high-risk patients). Hydration is a mainstay of treatment for acute pancreatitis, independent of etiology. Aggressive hydration has also been shown to decrease incidence of PEP. Rectal NSAIDs, including Indomethacin, has a proven role in prevention of PEP. Though both aggressive hydration and rectal indomethacin are efficacious in preventing PEP, there is no head to head trial comparing the efficacy of these two therapeutic modalities. Thus, the aim is to determine whether aggressive intravenous peri-procedural hydration or high dose rectal indomethacin immediately after ERCP decrease the incidence of PEP. The investigator's hypothesis is that prophylactic treatment with aggressive intravenous hydration is not inferior to rectal indomethacin in preventing PEP.

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a commonly performed endoscopic procedure used to treat pancreato-biliary pathology. Acute pancreatitis is the most common major complication of (ERCP)\[1\] which is reported to occur in 2-10% of patients overall (ranging from 2-4% in low risk patients up to 8-40% in high-risk patients) \[1, 2\]. The wide range of reported incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis over risk groups in observational studies prompted a 2014 systematic review including 108 RCTs that covered 13 296 patients\[3\]. The overall incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 9.7%, of which 8.6% of cases were mildly severe, 3.9% were moderate,and 0.8% were severe. The incidence of all-severity post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients was 14.7%. This study also found, however, that the incidence of severe post-ERCP pancreatitis (0.5% of all ERCPs performed) did not differ between patients in a high-risk subgroup and non-risk-stratified RCTs (0.8% vs. 0.4%, respectively), perhaps due to heterogeneity between the RCTs regarding the risk assessment of patients The generally accepted criteria for the diagnosis of post-ERCP pancreatitis were proposed in 1991 during a consensus workshop. These criteria include new onset of pancreatic-type abdominal pain associated with at least a threefold increase in serum amylase or lipase occurring within 24 h after ERCP, and the pain symptoms need to be sufficiently severe to require admission to the hospital or to extend the length of stay of patients who are already hospitalized \[3\]. Hydration is a mainstay of treatment for acute pancreatitis, independent of etiology\[4\]. Experiments in animal models demonstrate that pancreatic microvascular hypoperfusion leads to necrosis\[5\]. Clinical studies of fluid resuscitation in patients with acute pancreatitis suggest that hemoconcentration and decreased systemic perfusion are associated with increased risk of pancreas necrosis and unfavorable outcome \[6\]. Hydration has also been shown to decrease incidence of PEP. Besides Hydration, rectal NSAIDS, including Indomethacin, has role in prevention of post ERCP Acute pancreatitis. Though both aggressive hydration and rectal indomethacin are efficacious in preventing Post ERCP pancreatitis there is no head to head trial comparing the efficacy of these two therapeutic modality. To determine whether aggressive intravenous peri-procedural hydration or high dose rectal indomethacin immediately after ERCP decrease the incidence of post ERCP pancreatitis. The investigator's hypothesis is that prophylactic treatment with aggressive intravenous hydration is not inferior to rectal indomethacin in protecting against Post ERCP pancreatitis .