This was a Phase III study of pembrolizumab plus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy with or without canakinumab in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous and squamous NSCLC participants.
The study primarily assessed the safety and tolerability (safety run-in Part A) of pembrolizumab plus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy with canakinumab, and then, the efficacy (double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Part B) of pembrolizumab plus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy with or without canakinumab.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
673
canakinumab 200 mg subcutaneous (s.c.) injection every 3 weeks (squamous and non-squamous)
canakinumab placebo every 3 weeks (squamous and non-squamous)
200 mg every 3 weeks (squamous and non-squamous)
Part 1 (Safety Run-in): Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
A DLT was defined as an adverse event or abnormal laboratory value assessed as unrelated to disease progression, inter-current illness, or concomitant medications that met certain criteria as defined in the protocol.
Time frame: During the first 42 days of dosing
Part 2 (Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled): Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Investigator Assessment Using RECIST v1.1
Progression free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documented radiological progression using RECIST 1.1 (Response evaluation criteria in solid tumor) or death due to any cause.
Time frame: 18 months
Part 2 (Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled): Overall Survival (OS) Per Investigator Assessment Using RECIST v1.1
Overall survival is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause.
Time frame: Up to approximately 32 months
Part 1 (Safety Run-in): Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Investigator Assessment Using RECIST v1.1
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with confirmed best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), as per investigator's assessment by RECIST 1.1. CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Time frame: Up to approximately 14 months
Part 2 (Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled): Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Investigator Assessment Using RECIST v1.1
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with confirmed best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), as per investigator's assessment by RECIST 1.1. CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Area Under the Curve (AUC) 5 mg/mL\*min every 3 weeks (non-squamous) or AUC 6 mg/mL\*min (squamous)
75 mg/m\^2 every 3 weeks (non-squamous)
200 mg/m\^2 every 3 weeks (squamous)
100 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 8, and 15 of every cycle (squamous)
500 mg/m\^2 every 3 weeks (non-squamous)
Pacific Shores Medical Group
Long Beach, California, United States
USC Kenneth Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
AdventHealth
Orlando, Florida, United States
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Caba, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Caba, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
Novartis Investigative Site
Wooloongabba, Queensland, Australia
Novartis Investigative Site
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Novartis Investigative Site
Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
...and 142 more locations
Time frame: Up to approximately 26 months
Part 1 (Safety run-in): Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per Investigator Assessment Using RECIST v1.1
Disease control rate was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) or participants with stable disease (SD) as per investigator assessment according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; SD=Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease.
Time frame: Up to approximately 14 months
Part 2 (Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled): Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per Investigator Assessment Using RECIST v1.1
Disease control rate was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) or participants with stable disease (SD) as per investigator assessment according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; SD=Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease.
Time frame: Up to approximately 26 months
Part 1 (Safety run-in): Duration of Response (DOR) Per Investigator Assessment Using RECIST v1.1
Duration of response was defined as the time from first documented response of CR or PR to date of first documented progression or death due to any cause, according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. DOR only applied to participants whose best overall response was CR or PR based on tumor response data per local review. If a participant did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Time frame: Up to approximately 25 months
Part 2 (Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled): Duration of Response (DOR) Per Investigator Assessment Using RECIST v1.1
Duration of response was defined as the time from first documented response of CR or PR to date of first documented progression or death due to any cause, according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. DOR only applied to participants whose best overall response was CR or PR based on tumor response data per local review. If a participant did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Time frame: Up to approximately 26 months
Part 2 (Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled): Time to Response (TTR) Per Investigator Assessment Using RECIST v1.1
Time to response (TTR) was defined as duration of time between the date of randomization and the date of first documented response of either CR or PR, according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Duration of response was defined as the time from first documented response of CR or PR to date of first documented progression or death due to any cause, according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Time frame: Up to approximately 26 months
Part 1 (Safety Run-in): Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) of Canakinumab
Participants with at least one ADA-positive sample.
Time frame: Predose (0 hours (h)) on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 4, 8, 12, 16 (Cycle length =21 days), at end of treatment & then at 26, 78 and 130 days after last dose
Part 2 (Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled): Number of Participants With Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) of Canakinumab
Participants with at least one ADA-positive sample.
Time frame: Up to approximately 26 months
Part 1 (Safety run-in): Antidrug Antibodies (ADAs) of Pembrolizumab
Participants with at least one ADA-positive sample.
Time frame: Predose (0 h) on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 (Cycle length =21 days), at end of treatment & then at 26 days after last dose
Part 2 (Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled): Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) of Pembrolizumab
Participants with at least one ADA-positive sample.
Time frame: Up to approximately 26 months
Part 1 (Safety Run-in): Serum Canakinumab Concentration
Time frame: Predose (0 h) on Day 1 of Cycles 1-6, 8, 12, 16, Postdose on day 2, 8, 15 of Cycle 1, Post dose on Cycle 5 day 8, at end of treatment & then at 26, 78 and 130 days after last dose (Cycle length =21 days)
Part 2 (Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled): Serum Canakinumab Concentration
Time frame: Predose (0 h) on Day 1 of Cycles 1-6, 8, 12, 16, Postdose on day 2, 8, 15 of Cycle 1, Post dose on Cycle 5 day 8, at end of treatment & then at 26, 78 and 130 days after last dose (Cycle length =21 days)
Part 1 (Safety Run-in): Serum Pembrolizumab Concentration
Time frame: Predose (0 h) on Day 1 of Cycles 1-6, 8, 12, 16, Postdose on day 2, 8, 15 of Cycle 1, at end of treatment & then at 26 days after last dose (Cycle length =21 days)
Part 2 (Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled): Serum Pembrolizumab Concentration
Time frame: Predose (0 h) on Day 1 of Cycles 1-6, 8, 12, 16, Postdose on day 2, 8, 15 of Cycle 1, at end of treatment & then at 26 days after last dose (Cycle length =21 days)
Part 1 (Safety Run-in): Plasma Pemetrexed Concentration
Time frame: Predose (0 h) and end of infusion on Cycle 1 and 2; 1, 4, 8 h post infusion on Cycle 1; 1, 2, 4, 8h post infusion on Cycle 2 (Cycle length =21 days)
Part 2 (Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled): Plasma Pemetrexed Concentration
Time frame: Predose (0 h) and end of infusion on Cycle 1 and 2; 1, 4, 8 h post infusion on Cycle 1; 1, 2, 4, 8h post infusion on Cycle 2 (Cycle length =21 days)
Part 1 (Safety Run-in): Plasma Cisplatin Concentration
Time frame: Predose (0 h) and end of infusion on Cycle 1 and 2; 2, 4, 8 h post infusion on Cycle 1; 1.5, 2, 4, 8 h post infusion on Cycle 2 (Cycle length =21 days)
Part 2 (Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled): Plasma Cisplatin Concentration
Time frame: Predose (0 h) and end of infusion on Cycle 1 and 2; 2, 4, 8 h post infusion on Cycle 1; 1.5, 2, 4, 8 h post infusion on Cycle 2 (Cycle length = 21 days)
Part 1 (Safety Run-in): Plasma Carboplatin Concentration
Time frame: Predose (0 h), end of infusion, 1, 2, 4, 8 h post infusion on Cycles 1 and 2 (Cycle length =21 days)
Part 2 (Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled): Plasma Carboplatin Concentration
Time frame: Predose (0 h), end of infusion, 1, 2, 4, 8 h post infusion on Cycles 1 and 2 (Cycle length =21 days)
Part 1 (Safety Run-in): Plasma Paclitaxel Concentration
Time frame: Predose (0 h) and end of infusion on Cycle 1 and 2; 4, 8, 12 h post infusion on Cycle 1; 4, 6, 8, 12 h post infusion on Cycle 2 (Cycle length =21 days)
Part 2 (Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled): Plasma Paclitaxel Concentration
Time frame: Predose (0 h) and end of infusion on Cycle 1 and 2; 4, 8, 12 h post infusion on Cycle 1; 4, 6, 8, 12 h post infusion on Cycle 2 (Cycle length =21 days)
Part 2 (Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled): Plasma Nab-paclitaxel Concentration
Time frame: Predose (0 h) and end of infusion on Cy 1 and 2, 4, 8, 12 h post infusion on Cy 1, 4, 6, 8, 12 h post infusion on Cy 2 (Cy length =21 days)
Part 2 (Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled): Time to Definitive 10-point Deterioration (TTDD) Symptom Scores of Pain, Cough and Dyspnea Per EORTC QLQ-LC13 Questionnaire
The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer 13 (EORTC QLQ-LC13) comprises both multi-item and single-item measures of lung cancer-associated symptoms (ie, coughing, dyspnea, and chest pain). Scores for each scale and single-item range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher level of symptoms. TTDD for chest pain, cough and dyspnea was defined as the time from randomization to the date of event, which was defined as at least 10 points absolute worsening from baseline of the corresponding scale score, with no later change below this threshold ie.\<10 points was observed, or if this worsening was observed at the last assessment for the subject, or death due to any cause (whichever occurred earlier). If a subject did not have an event, TTDD was censored at the last adequate assessment.
Time frame: Up to approximately 25 months
Part 2 (Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled): Time to Definitive Deterioration in Global Health Status/Quality of Life, Shortness of Breath and Pain Per EORTC QLQ-C30 Questionnaire
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a questionnaire developed to assess the health-related quality of life of cancer participants. It assesses 15 domains consisting of 5 functional domains (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social) and 9 symptom domains (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties) and a global health status/QoL scale. All domain scores range from 0 to 100. A high score for the functional or global health status scales indicates a high level of functioning or QoL; a high score for a symptom scale indicates a high level of symptoms.
Time frame: Up to approximately 25 months
Part 2 (Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled): Change From Baseline in Score as Per the EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire
The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a standardized measure of health status developed by the EuroQol Group in order to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. The EQ-5D-5L measures 5 items on mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression, measured on 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. A utility index can be computed from the EQ 5D-5L descriptive system with utility scores ranging from -0.281 (worst imaginable health state) to 1 (best imaginable health state), with -0.281 representing an "unconscious" health state. A single index value is analyzed for the EQ-5D-5L score. An increase from baseline in the EQ-ED-5L utility index is indicative of an improvement.). CFB = change from baseline
Time frame: Assessed every 3 weeks from Week 3 through Week 108, at follow-up visits 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 (follow-up visits occurred every 26 days from week 108), and at 7 and 28 days post-disease progression, all up to a maximum of 3.5 years
Part 2 (Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled): Change From Baseline in Score as Per the EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire - Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized questionnaire used to assess health-related quality of life, and it includes a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS score is obtained by asking the individual to rate their current health status on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst possible health state and 100 represents the best possible health state. The change from baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS score was calculated. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement in the health status. CFB = change from baseline
Time frame: Assessed every 3 weeks from Week 3 through Week 108, at follow-up visits 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 (follow-up visits occurred every 26 days from week 108), and at 7 and 28 days post-disease progression, all up to a maximum of 3.5 years