The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of switching from a regimen of 2 nucleos(t)Ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and a third agent to a fixed dose combination (FDC) of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) versus continuing their baseline regimen in HIV-1 infected, virologically suppressed African American participants.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
496
50/200/25 mg FDC tablets administered orally once daily without regard to food
The following NRTIs will be administered as prescribed until Week 24 without regard to food: abacavir (ABC), emtricitabine (FTC), lamivudine (3TC), tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), zidovudine (ZDV or AZT)
Any one of the following third agents will be administered as prescribed. Protease inhibitors and EVG will be administered with the appropriate pharmacologic booster cobicistat or ritonavir. : * Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) * delavirdine (DLV) * efavirenz (EFV) * nevirapine (NVP) * rilpivirine (RPV) * doravirine (DOR) * Integrase inhibitors * dolutegravir (DTG) * elvitegravir (EVG) * raltegravir (RAL) * Protease inhibitors (PIs) * atazanavir (ATV) * darunavir (DRV) * lopinavir (LPV) * nelfinavir NFV) * saquinavir (SQV) * tipranavir (TPV) * Chemokine co-recptor 5 (CCR5) antagonist --maraviroc (MVC)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Alabama Medical Group, PC
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Ruane Clinical Research Group Inc.
Los Angeles, California, United States
Mills Clinical Research
Los Angeles, California, United States
Percentage of Participants Who Had HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 Copies/mL at Week 24 as Defined by the US FDA-Defined Snapshot Algorithm: Full Analysis Set
The percentage of participants who had HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL at Week 24 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defined a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status.
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Had HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 as Defined by the US FDA-Defined Snapshot Algorithm: Full Analysis Set
The percentage of participants who had HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defined a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. By Week 48, participants in B/F/TAF had received 48 weeks of treatment with B/F/TAF, while those in the Delayed B/F/TAF group had received only 24 weeks of treatment with B/F/TAF.
Time frame: Week 48
Percentage of Participants Who Had HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 24 as Defined by the US FDA-Defined Snapshot Algorithm: Full Analysis Set
The percentage of participants who had HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL at Week 24 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defined a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status.
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Had HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 24 as Defined by the US FDA-Defined Snapshot Algorithm: Week 24 Per Protocol Analysis Set
The percentage of participants who had HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL at Week 24 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defined a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status.
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Had HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 as Defined by the US FDA-Defined Snapshot Algorithm: Full Analysis Set
The percentage of participants who had HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defined a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. By Week 48, participants in B/F/TAF had received 48 weeks of treatment with B/F/TAF, while those in the Delayed B/F/TAF group had received only 24 weeks of treatment with B/F/TAF.
Time frame: Week 48
Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 24: Full Analysis Set
The analysis includes values up to 1 day after permanent discontinuation of study treatment.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 24: Week 24 Per Protocol Analysis Set
The analysis includes values up to 1 day after permanent discontinuation of study treatment.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 48: Full Analysis Set
The analysis includes values up to 1 day after permanent discontinuation of study treatment. By Week 48, participants in B/F/TAF had received 48 weeks of treatment with B/F/TAF, while those in the Delayed B/F/TAF group had received only 24 weeks of treatment with B/F/TAF.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 48
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product, which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and/or unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A treatment-emergent adverse event was defined as any adverse event with onset date on or after the study treatment start date and no later than 30 days after the study drug stop date; or any adverse event leading to study drug discontinuation.
Time frame: First B/F/TAF dose date up to Week 72 plus 30 days
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Graded Laboratory Abnormalities
Treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were defined as values that increase at least one toxicity grade from baseline. The most severe graded abnormality from all tests was counted for each participant. Severity grades were defined by 'Gilead Grading Scale for Severity of AEs and Laboratory Abnormalities'.
Time frame: First B/F/TAF dose date up to Week 72 plus 30 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Highland Hospital- Alameda Health System
Oakland, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente
Oakland, California, United States
One Community Health
Sacramento, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente
Sacramento, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente, Department of Infectious Diseases
San Leandro, California, United States
...and 72 more locations