This double-blinded randomized control study will use kinematic and kinetic measures to compare an anatomical congruent prosthetic knee design to a standard prosthetic knee design. The patients will be measured pre- and post-operative and compared to a healthy non-osteoarthritis control group.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
75
Zimmer Biomet's Personalized Knee system for knee osteoarthritis treatment. The standard insert.
Zimmer Biomet's Personalized Knee system for knee osteoarthritis treatment. The new anatomical congruent shaped insert.
University Clinic of Hand, Hip and Knee Surgery, Regional Hospital Holstebro
Holstebro, Denmark
Kinematics - knee joint movement
Relative movement (position in millimetres and orientation in degrees) of the knee joint.
Time frame: 1 year follow-up
Articular joint contact
Contact between femur and tibia
Time frame: 1 year follow-up
Kinetic - knee joint contact force
Internal knee forces (normal and share) of the femur and tibia
Time frame: 1 year follow-up
Implant inducible micromotion
Quantifying dynamic inducible micromotion during daily activities.
Time frame: 1 year follow-up
Static implant migration
baseline, three month after surgery and one year after surgery.
Time frame: 3, 12 and 24 month post operation using first operative day as baseline.
Patient Reported Output Measure
Measured pre- and post operation
Time frame: 1 year follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.