This multicenter, double-blind, 2-arm, randomized study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus paclitaxel and caboplatin compared with placebo plus paclitaxel and caboplatin in Chinese participants with newly diagnosed, previously untreated Stage III or Stage IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. Participants whose disease has not progressed after six cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin with either bevacizumab or placebo will continue treatment with either bevacizumab or placebo until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a maximum of 22 cycles, whichever occurs first.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
100
175 mg/m\^2 IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.
15 mg/kg IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 6 mg/ml/min on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.
Placebo matched to bevacizumab IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.
Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, China
the First Hospital of Jilin University
Changchun, China
Jilin Cancer Hospital
Changchun, China
Xiangya Hospital Central South University
Changsha, China
West China Second University Hospital
Chengdu, China
Fujian Cancer Hospital
Fuzhou, China
Sun Yet-sen University Cancer Center
Guangzhou, China
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital; Zhejiang Cancer Hospital cancer department
Hangzhou, China
Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital
Harbin, China
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
Nanjing, China
...and 6 more locations
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression, as assessed by the Investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: Randomization up to disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 24 months)
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause.
Time frame: Randomization up to to death from any cause (up to approximately 54.1 months)
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR was defined as the proportion of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by investigator according to RECIST v.1.1.
Time frame: Randomization up to disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 24 months)
Duration of Response (DOR)
DOR was defined as the time from when response (CR or PR) was first documented to first documented disease progression,as assessed by the Investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was evaluated for participants who had a objective response of CR or PR.
Time frame: From the date of first occurrence of a complete or partial response until disease progression or death from any cause (up to approximately 24 months)
Percentage of Participants Who Report a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Patient-Reported Abdominal Pain
A clinically meaningful improvement in patient-reported abdominal pain or bloating was defined as a ≥10-point decrease from the linearly transformed 0-100 point baseline symptom scale score on each of two items from the Abdominal/Gastrointestinal Symptom Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Ovarian Cancer Module (QLQ-OV28).
Time frame: From randomization to the end of treatment/discontinuation (up to approximately 70 weeks), and during follow-up period (up to approximately 24 months)
Percentage of Participants Who Report a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Patient-Reported Bloating
A clinically meaningful improvement in patient-reported abdominal pain or bloating was defined as a ≥10-point decrease from the linearly transformed 0-100 point baseline symptom scale score on each of two items from the Abdominal/Gastrointestinal Symptom Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Ovarian Cancer Module (QLQ-OV28).
Time frame: From randomization to the end of treatment/discontinuation (up to approximately 70 weeks), and during follow-up period (up to approximately 24 months)
Percentage of Participants Who Report a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Patient-Reported Function (Physical)
A clinically meaningful improvement in patient-reported function and HRQoL was defined as a \>10-point increase from the linearly transformed 0-100 point baseline scale score on each of the four functional (physical, role, emotional, social) scales and global health status/HRQoL scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30).
Time frame: From randomization to the end of treatment/discontinuation (up to approximately 70 weeks), and during follow-up period (up to approximately 24 months)
Percentage of Participants Who Report a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Patient-Reported Function (Role)
A clinically meaningful improvement in patient-reported function and HRQoL was defined as a \>10-point increase from the linearly transformed 0-100 point baseline scale score on each of the four functional (physical, role, emotional, social) scales and global health status/HRQoL scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30).
Time frame: From randomization to the end of treatment/discontinuation (up to approximately 70 weeks), and during follow-up period (up to approximately 24 months)
Percentage of Participants Who Report a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Patient-Reported Function (Social)
A clinically meaningful improvement in patient-reported function and HRQoL was defined as a \>10-point increase from the linearly transformed 0-100 point baseline scale score on each of the four functional (physical, role, emotional, social) scales and global health status/HRQoL scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30).
Time frame: From randomization to the end of treatment/discontinuation (up to approximately 70 weeks), and during follow-up period (up to approximately 24 months)
Percentage of Participants Who Report a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Patient-Reported Function (Emotional)
A clinically meaningful improvement in patient-reported function and HRQoL was defined as a \>10-point increase from the linearly transformed 0-100 point baseline scale score on each of the four functional (physical, role, emotional, social) scales and global health status/HRQoL scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30).
Time frame: From randomization to the end of treatment/discontinuation (up to approximately 70 weeks), and during follow-up period (up to approximately 24 months)
Pecentage of Participants Who Report a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Patient-Reported Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
A clinically meaningful improvement in patient-reported function and HRQoL was defined as a \>10-point increase from the linearly transformed 0-100 point baseline scale score on each of the four functional (physical, role, emotional, social) scales and global health status/HRQoL scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30).
Time frame: From randomization to the end of treatment/discontinuation (up to approximately 70 weeks), and during follow-up period (up to approximately 24 months)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: From randomization up to 90 days after last dose of study treatment or until initiation of new anti-cancer therapy (up to approximately 76 weeks)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.