During the past decade, especially with the advancement of technology, major innovations and developments have been observed in the field of surgery. Cardiac surgery is one of the important area of the surgery who renews itself day by day and adds innovations to the nature in terms of patients' comfort. One of the greatest developments in cardiac surgery in this sense is the tendency to reduce the size of the incisions with less interventional procedures. Robotic surgery is getting more and more meaningful in this area. Despite the downsizing of the surgical incisions, postoperative pulmonary complications have not completely disappeared in the robotic cardiac surgery. Major respiratory problems following traditional cardiac surgery are gas exchange problems, atelectasis, decreased coughing force and sputum retention. The effectiveness of respiratory physiotherapy applied after traditional cardiac surgery for the resolution of these complications has been proved by various investigations. Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) has been found to improve autonomic modulation in heart failure patients as well as to increase inspiratory muscle strength in applied patient populations, reduce blood pressure in hypertensive patients, and increase functional capacity in elderly individuals. Considering these benefits, when inspiratory muscle training is given to people with traditional cardiac surgery, respiratory muscle strengths, respiratory functions and functional capacities are increased compared to those not given to these patients. However, although there are complications after robotic cardiac surgery, there are no studies in the literature about respiratory physiotherapy or inspiratory muscle training. Thus, the subject of this study is the comparison of the effects of standard respiratory physiotherapy and standard respiratory physiotherapy plus inspiratory muscle training on the respiratory functions, respiratory muscle strength and functional capacity of the patients with the robotic heart surgery.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
20
Standard respiratory physiotherapy content; diaphragmatic breathing, pursed lip breathing, segmental breathing, incentive spirometer exercises (Triflo) and coughing techniques.
Standard respiratory physiotherapy content; diaphragmatic breathing, pursed lip breathing, segmental breathing, incentive spirometer exercises (Triflo) and coughing techniques. Addition to that, threshold IMT device will be used for the training. Training intensity will set at 40% of the maximum inspiratory pressure.
Acıbadem MAA University Maslak Hospital
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Change from baseline Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 4 weeks
Time frame: Four weeks
Change from baseline Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 4 weeks
Time frame: Four weeks
Change from baseline Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at 4 weeks
Time frame: Four weeks
Change from baseline maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) at 4 weeks
Time frame: Four weeks
Change from baseline maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) at 4 weeks
Time frame: Four weeks
Change from baseline distance covered in six-minute walk test (6MWT) at 4 weeks
Time frame: Four weeks
Change from baseline carbon monoxide diffusion capacity of the lungs (DLCO) at 4 weeks
Time frame: Four weeks
Fatigue Severity Scale
The 9 item scale which measures the severity of fatigue and its effect on a person's activities and lifestyle in patients with a variety of disorders. Assessment type: Patient reported outcomes.The items are scored on a 7 point scale with 1 = strongly disagree and 7= strongly agree.The minimum score = 9 and maximum score possible = 63. Higher the score = greater fatigue severity.
Time frame: Four weeks
Fatigue Impact Scale
The fatigue impact scale was developed to assess the symptom of fatigue as part of an underlying chronic disease or condition. Consisting of 40 items, the instrument evaluates the effect of fatigue on three domains of daily life: cognitive functioning, physical functioning, and psychosocial functioning. Respondents are asked to rate the extent to which fatigue has interfered with certain aspects of their day-to-day functioning using a scale that ranges from 0 ("no problem") to 4 ("extreme problem"). Scores are then tallied to produce an overall score with a potential maximum of 160. Subscale scores can also be calculated to give a more nuanced impression of fatigue.
Time frame: Four weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.