This is a phase 4, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial to evaluate the efficacy of a single injected dose of Benzathine Penicillin G (BPG) 2.4 MU (Arm 1) compared to three successive weekly injected doses of BPG 2.4 MU (Arm 2) for treatment of early syphilis in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected and HIV-uninfected subjects. The study will enroll 560 adults (to achieve 420 evaluable subjects) aged 18 years or older with untreated early syphilis (primary, secondary, or early latent). It will be conducted at 9 sites in the US and last for 48 months with patient participation duration of 12 months. The primary objective is to compare the serological response to therapy in subjects with early (primary, secondary, or early latent) syphilis treated with Benzathine Penicillin G (BPG) 2.4 million units (MU) once or weekly for three successive weeks.
This is a phase 4, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial to evaluate the efficacy of a single injected dose of Benzathine Penicillin G (BPG) 2.4 MU (Arm 1) compared to three successive weekly injected doses of BPG 2.4 MU (Arm 2) for treatment of early syphilis in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected and HIV-uninfected subjects. The study will enroll 560 adults (to achieve 420 evaluable subjects) aged 18 years or older with untreated early syphilis (primary, secondary, or early latent). It will be conducted at 9 sites in the US and last for 48 months with patient participation duration of 12 months. The primary objective is to compare the serological response to therapy in subjects with early (primary, secondary, or early latent) syphilis treated with Benzathine Penicillin G (BPG) 2.4 million units (MU) once or weekly for three successive weeks. The secondary objectives are: 1) to determine if the difference in response to therapy between treatment arms by Month 6 differs among subjects with or without HIV infection; 2) to determine the impact of multiple BPG injected doses on subject compliance with study product and adherence to the corresponding scheduled visits; 3) to determine the incidence and manifestations of the Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction among subjects treated for early syphilis with BPG; 4) to collect prospective data up to Month 12 on the serological response to therapy in subjects treated for early syphilis with either BPG regimen; 5) to compare epidemiological characteristics of early syphilis among subjects with or without HIV infection.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
249
BPG will be administered as a deep intramuscular injection in the upper, outer quadrant of the buttock.
University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine - Infectious Disease
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Emory University Hospital Midtown - Emory Clinic Infectious Diseases
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Indiana University School of Medicine - Infectious Diseases
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center - Infectious Diseases
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Fenway Health - The Fenway Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of North Carolina School of Medicine - Center for Infectious Diseases
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Wake Forest Baptist Health - Infectious Diseases
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Magee Women's Hospital of UPMC - Reproductive Infectious Disease Research
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Washington - Harborview Medical Center - Center for AIDS and STD
Seattle, Washington, United States
The Number of Participants With a Serological Response by Month 6.
Serological response to therapy by Month 6 was defined as follows, where available rapid plasma reagin (RPR) results from all visits prior to the end of the Month 6 visit window (i.e., scheduled visits up to and including the Month 6 visit, early termination visit, or any unscheduled visit that occurred prior to the end of month 6 visit window) were evaluated: * 4-fold or greater decline in RPR titer at any visit prior to the end of the Month 6 visit window compared to baseline, OR * RPR-negative at any visit prior to the end of the Month 6 visit window (i.e., seroreversion).
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 180
Categorical Descriptive Statistics of Sexual History at Baseline Collected Via a Study-specific Questionnaire
Gender identity, sexual orientation, sexual partner, sex history in last 60 days
Time frame: Day 1
Continuous Descriptive Statistics of Sexual History at Baseline Collected Via a Study-specific Questionnaire
Sex history in last 60 days
Time frame: Day 1
Categorical Descriptive Statistics of Socio-epidemiologic Characteristics at Baseline Collected Via a Study-specific Questionnaire
Highest level of education completed, stage of syphilis, prior syphilis history
Time frame: Day 1
Continuous Descriptive Statistics of Socio-epidemiologic Characterictics at Baseline Collected Via a Study-specific Questionnaire
Years of formal education
Time frame: Day 1
Categorical Descriptive Statistics of Participant Baseline Demographics Collected Via a Study-specific Questionnaire
Sex, Ethnicity, Race
Time frame: Day 1
Continuous Descriptive Statistics of Participant Baseline Demographics Collected Via a Study-specific Questionnaire
Age
Time frame: Day 1
The Number of Participants Who Receive All Assigned Doses Within the Assigned Visit Windows
Compliance with study product will be defined as the participant received all assigned doses within the assigned visit windows. A participant is not adherent to study product if they miss at least one dose or receive at least one dose out of the visit window.
Time frame: Through Month 12
The Number of Participants Who Report Jarisch-Herxheimer Reaction Manifestations
Approximately 24 hours after Visit 1, participants were contacted and evaluated for symptoms of a JHR, which included fever, chills, myalgia, weakness, flushing, worsening of skin rash, tachycardia, heart palpitations, arthralgia, nausea, headache, and dizziness, including time of onset and time of resolution of each symptom reported.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 2
Number of Participants With Serological Response by Month 6 Among Participants With or Without HIV Infection
Serological response to therapy by Month 6 was defined as follows, where available rapid plasma reagin (RPR) results from all visits prior to the end of the Month 6 visit window (i.e., scheduled visits up to and including the Month 6 visit, early termination visit, or any unscheduled visit that occurred prior to the end of month 6 visit window) were evaluated: * 4-fold or greater decline in RPR titer at any visit prior to the end of the Month 6 visit window compared to baseline, OR * RPR-negative at any visit prior to the end of the Month 6 visit window (i.e., seroreversion). Serological response to therapy by Month 6 was examined among participants with and without HIV infection,
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 180
Number of Participants With Serological Response (Defined as Either a 4-fold or Greater Decline in Rapid Plasma Regain (RPR) Titer Compared to Baseline or Being Rapid Plasma Regain -Negative [Seroreversion]) by Month 12.
Serological response to therapy by Month 12 was defined as follows, where available rapid plasma reagin (RPR) results from all visits prior to the end of the Month 12 visit window (i.e., scheduled visits up to and including the Month 12 visit, early termination visit, or any unscheduled visit that occurred prior to the end of month 12 visit window) were evaluated: * 4-fold or greater decline in RPR titer at any visit prior to the end of the Month 12 visit window compared to baseline, OR * RPR-negative at any visit prior to the end of the Month 12 visit window (i.e., seroreversion).
Time frame: Through month 12
Number of Participants With Serological Response by Month 12 Among Subjects With or Without HIV Infection
Serological response to therapy by Month 12 was defined as follows, where available rapid plasma reagin (RPR) results from all visits prior to the end of the Month 12 visit window (i.e., scheduled visits up to and including the Month 12 visit, early termination visit, or any unscheduled visit that occurred prior to the end of month 6 visit window) were evaluated: * 4-fold or greater decline in RPR titer at any visit prior to the end of the Month 12 visit window compared to baseline, OR * RPR-negative at any visit prior to the end of the Month 12visit window (i.e., seroreversion). Serological response to therapy by Month 12 was examined among participants with and without HIV infection,
Time frame: Through month 12
Categorical Descriptive Statistics of Sexual History at Week 1 Collected Via a Study-specific Questionnaire
Sex history since last visit.
Time frame: Through week 1
Categorical Descriptive Statistics of Sexual History at Week 2 Collected Via a Study-specific Questionnaire
Sex history since last visit.
Time frame: Through week 2
Categorical Descriptive Statistics of Sexual History at Month 1 Collected Via a Study-specific Questionnaire
Sex history since last visit.
Time frame: Through month 1
Categorical Descriptive Statistics of Sexual History at Month 3 Collected Via a Study-specific Questionnaire
Sex history since last visit.
Time frame: Through month 3
Categorical Descriptive Statistics of Sexual History at Month 6 Collected Via a Study-specific Questionnaire
Sex history since last visit.
Time frame: Through month 6
Categorical Descriptive Statistics of Sexual History at Month 9 Collected Via a Study-specific Questionnaire
Sex history since last visit.
Time frame: Through month 9
Categorical Descriptive Statistics of Sexual History at Month 12 Collected Via a Study-specific Questionnaire
Sex history since last visit.
Time frame: Through month 12
Continuous Descriptive Statistics of Sexual History at Week 1 Collected Via a Study-specific Questionnaire
Sex history since last visit
Time frame: Through week 1
Continuous Descriptive Statistics of Sexual History at Week 2 Collected Via a Study-specific Questionnaire
Sex history since last visit
Time frame: Through week 2
Continuous Descriptive Statistics of Sexual History at Month 1 Collected Via a Study-specific Questionnaire
Sex history since last visit
Time frame: Through month 1
Continuous Descriptive Statistics of Sexual History at Month 3 Collected Via a Study-specific Questionnaire
Sex history since last visit
Time frame: Through month 3
Continuous Descriptive Statistics of Sexual History at Month 6 Collected Via a Study-specific Questionnaire
Sex history since last visit
Time frame: Through month 6
Continuous Descriptive Statistics of Sexual History at Month 9 Collected Via a Study-specific Questionnaire
Sex history since last visit
Time frame: Through month 9
Continuous Descriptive Statistics of Sexual History at Month 12 Collected Via a Study-specific Questionnaire
Sex history since last visit
Time frame: Through month 12
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.