This trial will study two treatment combinations for classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). This trial will find out if these two treatment combinations work to treat cHL. It will also find out what side effects occur. A side effect is anything the drug does besides treating cancer. This study will have three parts (Parts A, B, and C). The drugs used in Part A are a combination of targeted anticancer drug (brentuximab vedotin) and three chemotherapy drugs (doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine). These four drugs are called "A+AVD." Participants will be treated with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) following every dose of A+AVD for 6 cycles of treatment (12 doses). Part A will look at whether the A+AVD drug combination reduces the number of participants who experience the side effect of febrile neutropenia. Febrile neutropenia is a very low white blood cell count and a fever, which can be life threatening. Parts B and C will use drug combination of brentuximab vedotin, plus nivolumab, doxorubicin, and dacarbazine. These four drugs are called "AN+AD." Parts B and C will study how well the drugs work to treat cHL and what side effects they cause.
This study will have three parts. Part A of the study is designed to evaluate the incidence of febrile neutropenia, efficacy, and dose intensity in participants with advanced stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) receiving granulocyte colony stimulating factor primary prophylaxis (G-PP) administration during treatment with frontline A+AVD. In Part A, participants will be treated with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) following every dose of A+AVD for 6 cycles of treatment. Participants will be treated using institutional standard of care practices for the majority of treatment decisions. Part B is designed to evaluate the combination of brentuximab vedotin, nivolumab, doxorubicin, and dacarbazine (AN+AD) as frontline treatment in participants with advanced cHL. In Part B, participants will be given AN+AD combination for 6 cycles of treatment. This part of the trial will look at whether this combination of drugs is effective and tolerable in participants with Stage II with bulky mediastinal disease and Stage III or IV cHL. Part C is designed to evaluate AN+AD as frontline treatment in participants with early stage cHL. In Part C, participants will be given AN+AD combination for 4 cycles of treatment. This part of the trial will look at whether this combination of drugs is effective and tolerable in participants with Stage I or II cHL with non-bulky mediastinal disease.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
255
1.2 mg/kg by IV infusion
25 mg/m\^2 by IV infusion
6 mg/m\^2 by IV infusion
375 mg/m\^2 by IV infusion
Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) primary prophylaxis administered 24-36 hours after each dose of A+AVD
240 mg by IV infusion
Los Angeles Cancer Network / Compassionate Care Research Group
Fountain Valley, California, United States
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers - Aurora
Aurora, Colorado, United States
University of Colorado Health Memorial Hospital
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Cancer Centers of Colorado - Denver
Denver, Colorado, United States
Poudre Valley Health System (PVHS)
Fort Collins, Colorado, United States
Febrile Neutropenia (FN) Rate (Part A)
The FN rate is defined as the number of participants who experience treatment-emergent FN.
Time frame: 7.5 months
Complete Response (CR) Rate at EOT (Parts B and C)
CR rate at EOT is defined as the percentage of participants with CR at EOT, according to the Lugano Classification Revised Staging System for malignant lymphoma (Cheson 2014) with the incorporation of Lymphoma Response to Immunomodulatory Therapy Criteria (LYRIC) (Cheson 2016), in participants with previously untreated cHL.
Time frame: 7.8 months
Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Clinical Interest (AECI) (Part A)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigational participant administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Participants with peripheral neuropathy (PN) adverse events were summarized under AECI.
Time frame: Approximately up to 7.5 months
Primary Refractory Disease Rate (Part A)
The primary refractory disease rate is defined as the percentage of participants with less than complete response or relapse within 3 months of EOT, according to the Lugano Classification Revised Staging System for nodal non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphomas
Time frame: 10.2 months
Complete Response Rate (Part A)
The complete response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with CR at EOT according to the Lugano Classification Revised Staging System for nodal non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphomas (Cheson 2014).
Time frame: 7.2 months
Physician-reported Progression Free Survival (PFS) (Part A)
The physician-reported PFS rate at 2 years is estimated based on Kaplan-Meier methodology. The determination of antitumor activity will be based on response assessments made according to the Lugano Classification Revised Staging System for nodal non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphomas (Cheson 2014).
Time frame: 24 months
Number of Participants With Subsequent Anticancer Therapy Utilization (Part A)
Number of participants with subsequent anticancer therapy have been reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: 33.8 months
Actual Dose Intensity: Brentuximab Vedotin (Part A)
Time frame: 6.5 months
Actual Dose Intensity: Doxorubicin, Vinblastine, Dacarbazine (Part A)
Time frame: 6.5 months
Relative Dose Intensity (Part A)
Time frame: 6.5 months
Rate of Dose Reduction and Delays: Brentuximab Vedotin (Part A)
Time frame: 6.5 months
Rate of Dose Reduction and Delays: Doxorubicin (Part A)
Time frame: 6.5 months
Rate of Dose Reduction and Delays: Vinblastine (Part A)
Time frame: 6.5 months
Rate of Dose Reduction and Delays: Dacarbazine (Part A)
Time frame: 6.5 months
Incidence of Adverse Events (Parts B and C)
Time frame: 8.9 months
Incidence of Laboratory Abnormalities (Parts B and C)
Laboratory values were graded according to the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 4.03). As per NCI CTCAE version 4.03 grading, Grade 1 indicated mild or asymptomatic laboratory abnormalities, Grade 2 indicated moderate laboratory abnormalities, and Grade 3 indicated severe and 4 indicated life-threatening laboratory abnormalities.
Time frame: 8.9 months
Overall Response Rate (ORR) at EOT (Parts B and C)
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with CR or partial response (PR) at EOT according to the Lugano Classification Revised Staging System for malignant lymphoma (Cheson 2014) with the incorporation of LYRIC (Cheson 2016) in participants with previously untreated cHL.
Time frame: Up to 7.8 months
Duration of Response (DOR) at End of Study (Parts B and C)
DOR was defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of tumor progression per the Lugano Classification Revised Staging System for malignant lymphoma (Cheson 2014) with the incorporation of LYRIC (Cheson 2016) or death, whichever came first. Duration of response was only calculated for the subgroup of participants achieving a CR or PR. Participants without progression or death were censored on the date of the last radiological assessment of measured lesions. Kaplan-Meier method was used.
Time frame: Up to 51.1 months
Duration of Complete Response (DOCR) (Parts B and C)
DOCR was defined as the time from start of the first documentation of CR to the first documentation of tumor progression (per the Lugano Classification Revised Staging System for malignant lymphoma (Cheson 2014) with the incorporation of LYRIC (Cheson 2016) or death, whichever came first. DOCR was calculated for the subgroup of participants achieving CR. Participants without progression or death were censored on the date of the last radiological assessment of measured lesions. Kaplan-Meier method was used.
Time frame: Up to 51.1 months
Event Free Survival (EFS) Rate (Parts B and C)
EFS was defined as the time from the start of study treatment to the first documentation of objective tumor progression, death due to any cause, or receipt of subsequent anticancer therapy to treat residual or progressive disease, whichever occurred first. The determination of antitumor activity will be based on objective response assessments made according to Lugano Classification Revised Staging System for malignant lymphoma (Cheson 2014) with the incorporation of LYRIC (Cheson 2016). Participants without progression or death were censored on the date of the last radiological assessment of measured lesions. EFS rate was percentage of participants with EFS.
Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
PFS Rate (Parts B and C)
PFS was defined as the time from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death. The determination of antitumor activity will be based on objective response assessments made according to Lugano Classification Revised Staging System for malignant lymphoma (Cheson 2014) with the incorporation of LYRIC (Cheson 2016). Participants without progression or death were censored on the date of the last radiological assessment of measured lesions. Kaplan-Meier method was used.
Time frame: At months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42 from the start of study treatment
Overall Survival (OS) Rate (Parts B and C)
OS was defined as the time from start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive. Kaplan-Meier method was used.
Time frame: At months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42 from the start of study treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
SCL Health - St. Mary's Hospital & Medical Center
Grand Junction, Colorado, United States
Miami Cancer Institute at Baptist Health, Inc.
Miami, Florida, United States
Florida Cancer Specialists - North Region
St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center / Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, United States
Illinois Cancer Specialists
Niles, Illinois, United States
...and 66 more locations